“...Cardiac changes that are associated with pulmonary involvement of COVID-19 during the acute phase of infection are rapidly reversed after recovery from disease.” When people are hospitalized with the disease, the likelihood of heart-related diseases resulting from C-19 is low. So any heart damage IS due to the Jab and not the virus! Class action lawsuit against pharma anyone? 💉
“...Cardiac changes that are associated with pulmonary involvement of COVID-19 during the acute phase of infection are rapidly reversed after recovery from disease.” When people are hospitalized with the disease, the likelihood of heart-related diseases resulting from C-19 is low. So any heart damage IS due to the Jab and not the virus! Class action lawsuit against pharma anyone? 💉
Well of course, but are there any lawyers willing to lose their licenses courts have been pretty much paid off by big-pharma to block these cases
I recall that recently the courts ruled that "any chemical could be a vaccine, so long as the physician had good intentions", in other words the mRNA could have been rat-poison but so long as they thought it was a 'vaccine' there heart was in the right place,
Then another argument is that the Vax wasn't tested, or that mRNA isn't legal definition of a Vaccine, to which the courts have said, if WHO say's its a 'vax' then its a 'vax', again if WHO says a rat-turd is a vax, then its a vax.
Like our recent black-moron SCOTUS when asked "Can you tell a man from a woman", to which she responded "I don't have a PHD in biology", where the highest just-us in the land can't tell a boy from girl ( most 2 yr olds can ), then you can see why a 'vax' can be what alice in wonderland says it is
...
Our legal system is a fraud, almost all decisions are quid-pro-quo back room deals; Most lawyers never want to piss off a judge and force him to hear a case that he doesn't want to hear; The word is out nobody takes mRNA cases against BIG-PHARMA, we are in a WAR this is CIA-DOD operation and discovery of mRNA history is all classified
My understand is JFK jr is shopping for states where the judges & courts are NOT captured by big-pharma and there are a few, but when it goes to DC, then they'll just refuse to hear the case.
“...Cardiac changes that are associated with pulmonary involvement of COVID-19 during the acute phase of infection are rapidly reversed after recovery from disease.” When people are hospitalized with the disease, the likelihood of heart-related diseases resulting from C-19 is low. So any heart damage IS due to the Jab and not the virus! Class action lawsuit against pharma anyone? 💉
Well of course, but are there any lawyers willing to lose their licenses courts have been pretty much paid off by big-pharma to block these cases
I recall that recently the courts ruled that "any chemical could be a vaccine, so long as the physician had good intentions", in other words the mRNA could have been rat-poison but so long as they thought it was a 'vaccine' there heart was in the right place,
Then another argument is that the Vax wasn't tested, or that mRNA isn't legal definition of a Vaccine, to which the courts have said, if WHO say's its a 'vax' then its a 'vax', again if WHO says a rat-turd is a vax, then its a vax.
Like our recent black-moron SCOTUS when asked "Can you tell a man from a woman", to which she responded "I don't have a PHD in biology", where the highest just-us in the land can't tell a boy from girl ( most 2 yr olds can ), then you can see why a 'vax' can be what alice in wonderland says it is
...
Our legal system is a fraud, almost all decisions are quid-pro-quo back room deals; Most lawyers never want to piss off a judge and force him to hear a case that he doesn't want to hear; The word is out nobody takes mRNA cases against BIG-PHARMA, we are in a WAR this is CIA-DOD operation and discovery of mRNA history is all classified
My understand is JFK jr is shopping for states where the judges & courts are NOT captured by big-pharma and there are a few, but when it goes to DC, then they'll just refuse to hear the case.