You recently wrote of the American College of Physicians ignoring vaccine injury and failing the physicians and patients they serve. The most recent weekly update from them, their Annals of Internal Medicine has a very interesting focus. Several cases highlighted that are of the nature of vaccine injury, but not attributed to the vaccine
You recently wrote of the American College of Physicians ignoring vaccine injury and failing the physicians and patients they serve. The most recent weekly update from them, their Annals of Internal Medicine has a very interesting focus. Several cases highlighted that are of the nature of vaccine injury, but not attributed to the vaccine
- Looks a lot like the thrombus' being pulled from cadevars by ME's and at mortuaries today, in increasing numbers. Why is ACP pushing this case information now? But not vaccine related? Hmm.
Or this:
Primary Cardiac Angiosarcoma: Pericardial Erosion and Disseminated Metastasis in a Young Active Duty Man
Peri-infarction Pericarditis: A Fading Complication of Myocardial Infarction
- Another "rarely seen" case due to new medical testing technology, can be resolved quickly when diagnosed early enough. But again, why is ACP pushing this "rare" case information now? But not vaccine related?
Look Paul, others, I know the subjects that this ACP Journal updates each week, I've followed it a long time. But this is the first time they've published so many pieces on cases that are becoming more and more frequent since the mass vaccinations and the non-censored medical community has been highlighting as signals in the post-CV jab world. ACP is calling these types of cases rare. Yet now devoting prized highlighted information status to them in their weekly update read by millions. There is some kind of "there" there. For the awakened and uncensored medical community to pick up on and share their insights about.
You recently wrote of the American College of Physicians ignoring vaccine injury and failing the physicians and patients they serve. The most recent weekly update from them, their Annals of Internal Medicine has a very interesting focus. Several cases highlighted that are of the nature of vaccine injury, but not attributed to the vaccine
https://secure.campaigner.com/csb/Public/show/ghfx-4s62w--3c7j5y-6prjx75
Like this August 16, 2022 study released:
Large Free-Floating Right Atrial Thrombus
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/aimcc.2022.0141
- Looks a lot like the thrombus' being pulled from cadevars by ME's and at mortuaries today, in increasing numbers. Why is ACP pushing this case information now? But not vaccine related? Hmm.
Or this:
Primary Cardiac Angiosarcoma: Pericardial Erosion and Disseminated Metastasis in a Young Active Duty Man
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/aimcc.2022.0430
- A "rare" case of a death in a young, healthy, fit military man. Why is ACP pushing this "rare" case information now? But not vaccine related? Hmm.
Or this:
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/aimcc.2022.0146
Peri-infarction Pericarditis: A Fading Complication of Myocardial Infarction
- Another "rarely seen" case due to new medical testing technology, can be resolved quickly when diagnosed early enough. But again, why is ACP pushing this "rare" case information now? But not vaccine related?
Look Paul, others, I know the subjects that this ACP Journal updates each week, I've followed it a long time. But this is the first time they've published so many pieces on cases that are becoming more and more frequent since the mass vaccinations and the non-censored medical community has been highlighting as signals in the post-CV jab world. ACP is calling these types of cases rare. Yet now devoting prized highlighted information status to them in their weekly update read by millions. There is some kind of "there" there. For the awakened and uncensored medical community to pick up on and share their insights about.