same for Molnupiravir that failed in its study yet also got FDA approval, researchers and doctors knowing it causes mutations; so 2 drugs that failed clinical trials yet FDA granted approval? Makary?
These people need to be prosecuted AND exposed…there’s millions of people taking medications that have been approved and shouldn’t have been, and people still don’t know. We’ve been conditioned to ignore the small print endless list of side effects. This is not ok.
And there are people who can't get medications that are life saving, or can't get claims approved by health insurers that should be approved. That's the other side of the coin to people taking medications that are wrongly approved.
Exactly, well said. Many would benefit from HBOT, but no way can they get it. Of course we all know about hydroxychloroquine, fenbendazole, and ivermectin too.
A bigger question is, "why aren't people turning to alternative care rather then constantly relying on toxic drugs from the rockefeller medical cartel?"
Drugs are not the answer except in an emergency situation - life or death, which most "illnesses"/diseases are not. Most people have been programed (yes, brainwashed and programed) to believe that the "food" they eat is fine, they can be lazy so others will take care of whatever for them, and the drugs are the answer to all their ailments. None of that is true unless you're big tech, big "food", pHARMa. We are apart of nature and thus, nature is the answer for healing ailments NOT drugs.
"We’ve been conditioned to ignore the small print endless list of side effects. This is not ok."
IMO I would say we've been also conditioned to not act and live naturally, which means lots of movement, hard work (but not too hard), sufficient sun exposure, agility, speed, food gathering, fasting, proper rests, caring for your family, social networks, rituals, religions etc.
We have basically the same instincts and genes but the environment is much more toxic, including all kinds of chemicals, drugs, dirty air, ground, smartphones, electromagnetic radiation etc. Surely Kennedy is into these things. The problem alsis that big pharma and top-down "public health" buaucrats try to say "mRNA no mandats, but stop at our traditional vaccines" as if this is some TABOO topic. The more resistence there is, the more you know that they try to hide something.
Only after people are sick you come to the question of how you can heal them. First you would need to stop making them sick, therefore its totally warranted that Kennedy wants to go after the garbage put into US citizens. Imo he should NOT stop with food and water, but also go against traditional vaccines, mRNA shots, medical drugs, putting proper SCIENCE (as far as its even possible in these non-hard science fields) and FREEDOM as the basis of everything. You would need an open market where the best treatments, drugs (even natural or otherwise proven) wins in the evidence based scheme, and you wont try to force-apply some experimental military-grade LNP mRNA injection into every human. Who is so insane advocating for such top-down approach? Its insanity. 100% madness. Nothing can justify it except if you have Chinese motives, which means controlling and excerting control over every body that lives in your land. This is a problem, they admire China for its control, big data, AI usage, social credit system, pandemic control etc. The see it as better for biodefense, because people just do what they are told and force is just applied.
The land of the free becomes the land of the enslaved, just like every other nation. The US should be last land to fall. Good Trump is here now, but the dangers arent away (he could even supercharge the expansion). TECH is always here and expands. China is portrait as the role model. 100% distributed TECH + sensors + total surveillance + big data + AI + competitive edge, better for biodefense no? You just push ONE BUTTON and the whole society is SHUT DOWN / LOCKED DOWN, this is the aspiration. The moment everything is 100% digital and gov controlled, the control will be TOTAL. So you have to fight against tech (somehwhat), so people remain in control and free, while you still have the advantages of tech.
IMO I would say we've been also conditioned to not act and live naturally, which means lots of movement, hard work (but not too hard), sufficient sun exposure, agility, speed, food gathering, fasting, proper rests, caring for your family, social networks, rituals, religions etc.
When those pushing these treatments / enhancement of viral mechanisms as I call them, those pushing them rely on half the population to simply go along with their solution.
Two friends of mine were prescribed Paxlovid. Yes they both have now been tested three times positive for COVID! WOW, who would have thunk?
Good God! I sent them article after article about the failures of this drug. Obviously, to no avail! If society is unwilling to do their own research for whatever reason, then IMO, society gets what it’s deserved!
This may sound cruel. In one sense it’s very cruel. But nothing is more cruel than a doctor who is willing to subject their patients to a treatment which they should know has failed!
RSV is another example. Back in 1967 children died! Yet Moderna decides, we’re going to get it right. Once again, failure. I’m not sure any vaccine has benefits which outweigh the risk? Then again I’m not an expert.
But I do know when it’s raining and when I’m being pissed on! So should everybody. Research then decide. Maybe more doctors should schedule less patients for more research.
This is what’s become of our medical profession. Political BS, govt. overreach, etc!. Not for the betterment of society, no, no, no, for the betterment of, you guessed it, money! And more money! It’s not about anything but money! And power of course.
This may sound cruel. In one sense it’s very cruel. But nothing is more cruel than a doctor who is willing to subject their patients to a treatment which they should know has failed!
'This is what’s become of our medical profession. Political BS, govt. overreach, etc!. Not for the betterment of society, no, no, no, for the betterment of, you guessed it, money! And more money! It’s not about anything but money! And power of course.'
the DOI is DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm.2020.04.264 for the original paper....go to it and open the pdf in full, go to page 522, that is the original chart algorithm...there is no paxlovid or Molnupiravir and the evidence emerged that paxlovid and molnupiravir is ineffective and causes rebound and mutations etc. a person can with their doctor make their decisions what they wish to take but I am not in support of paxlovid and molnupiravir as two failed dangerous drugs. I WONT take it nor suggest anyone take it. the DOI I cited sbove is the key DOI to go off of and also, no doubt it is updated today to reflect nasal oral washes such as povidone and h peroxide, saline rinse, xylitol etc. and again, we know much more today how to manage this clinically...
The aim then of the early treatment was to pivot from single drug to SMDT regimens that should be employed as a critical strategy
to deal with any acute COVID-19 patients with the aim of reducing the intensity and duration of symptoms and avoiding hospitalization and death. key was to prevent you from entering hospital where the risk of death escalates dramatically especially for elderly high risk persons. but remember, doctors chose to do nothing, deny antibiotics (which was a key aspect of the regimen and anti-coagulants as it was more a blood clotting illness) and leave patients to die...send them home. so the approach was we try using repurposed therapeutics, that were safe, effective, regulatory approved, available, to save lives. multi pronged attack.
John, Here’s the McCullough protocol for spike detoxification.
I found it reading the current post from Dr Alexander.
1) Base Spike Detoxification (combined bromelain, natto kinase, curcumin) 2) Colchicine 3) 3 months of steroids, 4) rapamycin. McCullough’s own personal patient experience is that the spike detoxification plus colchicine shows tangible improvement in similar with no heart failure or cardiac arrest developing.
As what they do is push “fraudulent” treatments without proper proof of effectiveness, proper anything for that matter.
As long as it properly addresses the
“bank-accounts” heck what’s the big deal, right? Life doesn’t matter! Life, those useless eaters, have more than they need! “NEXT!”
This is how, this is why, this is where America and the American People find themselves today!
Trust in our
“Brilliantly Designed God Given Immunity!”
Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ knew how evil man would become which is exactly why He developed our natural immunity so well. Of course there’s always the question about “GOF” or a manmade virus, deliberately sending our God Given Immunity into overdrive!
Trust not “Man!” Trust only our Lord Jesus!
I am so sick of being lied to over and over and over again! This is how low man has descended! Shamefully low!
I love this post AJR...strikes all the right chords...
Trust in our
“Brilliantly Designed God Given Immunity!”
Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ knew how evil man would become which is exactly why He developed our natural immunity so well. Of course there’s always the question about “GOF” or a manmade virus, deliberately sending our God Given Immunity into overdrive!
The FDA must be completely gutted and started over. Start with a mission of what they do and how they do it and what associated behaviors are needed (eg honesty, integrity, open mindedness) etc.). Any deviation from these behaviors will result in immediate dismissal.
We have got to end this corruption and fraud in the pharmacy industry. It's ridiculous how much dangerous meds are approved just for profit and kickbacks and under table deals.
Seems no one in pharma or govt ever truly gets prison for this crap. Pelosi has been insider trading, steering money to her husband, etc for decades as has many others. We all know how the Clinton foundation was used for illegal donations like selling uranium to Russia.
Long prison sentences and new strong laws on vaccine and med testing and approval are needed.
Whatever amount those kickbacks were, they must have been exhorbitant. I heard of lame-assed doctor somewhere who was offered $1 million up front and $50 thousand a month just to keep his big mouth shut on all things Covid-19... I gotta go take care of some animals. At least they don't kill their own kind.
"How much kickback $$$ did Bourla give?" Answer: as much as they had to!
The criminal entities of Big Pharma rake in hundreds of billions every year. A few million here, and a few million there, are a drop in the bucket to keep the gravy train rolling.
Which once again I remind you of why there is NO ALTERNATIVE --- we either take THEM out, or they will take US out. They will NEVER repent ... they will NEVER stop. Why would they? They have too much to gain $$$, and almost nothing to lose (no legal consequences).
excellent post: 'Which once again I remind you of why there is NO ALTERNATIVE --- we either take THEM out, or they will take US out. They will NEVER repent ... they will NEVER stop. Why would they? They have too much to gain $$$, and almost nothing to lose (no legal consequences).'
Any doctor prescribing Paxlovid should be prosecuted. To make things more criminal, small pharmacy's pay 1600 for a 30 pc prescription yet are only reimbursed $800 on a good day. I think we are on the rollerball agenda.
1. using tiny needles to inject single cells with viral mRNA, INEFFECTIVE
2. using electric shock to make cells leaky enough so the viral plasmids could get in to be used to run off mRNA, SCARY AND UNPLEASANT,
3. using ultrasound to drive the vehicles containing the viral mRNA into cells where it could do its thing--hey, hospitals were having a hard enough time getting ventilators they were being told they HAD to have to handle the millions that would shortly be struck down by C19, so how in the world could they come up with that many ultrasound machines AND technicians AND training, so WAY TOO EXPENSIVE,
4. using powerful magnetic fields to do what 3 did would be even more expensive than 3 to the degree that an MRI machine is more expensive than an ultrasound machine and since you couldn’t coerce a lot of people to get naked and crawl inside a claustrophobic tube with a lot of scary banging, you’d have to develop more portable versions for just an arm and how much frigging money was THAT going to cost--and you can BET there were equipment manufacturers creaming their accounts receivable jeans over the prospects.
But Pfizer and the others were already familiar with the the nanoparticle, lipid moiety, and replication-disabled adenovirus cell transfection reagents from decades-long use with immortal cell lines in molecular biology labs to get proteins expressed in living cells for study.
They were totally familiar with PCR from decades of use that they could use to whip up huge amounts of spike protein genes to introduce in a variety of ways via the transfection reagents.
They were totally familiar with the work of Robert Malone introducing exogenous gene constructs into cells in vivo for therapeutic purposes either to supply what was lacking due to a mutant gene (the lack of which protein caused a disease state) or to silence a defective gene from being expressed (the presence of which defective protein caused a disease state). So they knew it could be appropriated for their NON-THERAPEUTIC approach of artificially infecting cells with viral genes, ostensibly to produce the same outcomes as traditional protein vaccines, but actually to make absolutely gigantic shitloads of money for them from the whole world clamoring to be saved from a virus they already knew posed no threat at all, well, except to a very small percentage of the population an even smaller percentage of which was always getting knocked off year in, year out by one or another of the almost 200 common cold viruses of flu. So big deal.
BUT, and here is the BIG but--their products acted exactly like one-gene artificial viruses infecting healthy cells indiscriminately (except for AstraZeneca) and provoking widespread, multi-system innate immune inflammatory attacks with the same serious immunological consequences as broadly-disseminated viral infections.
These companies knew THAT, but they concealed it.
Their experimental trials had two sets of books.
The first set showed what would be looked for in terms of outcomes for a viral protein vaccine: it showed the presence of viral antigens and antibodies and T cells. Okay, it also showed no reductions in death between product-plus and product-minus groups, just like Pfizer’s previous testing with their traditional viral protein vaccine. And it showed that people could still get C19 but, they claimed, it was a kinder and gentler form, meaning they would be less likely to die from it and, hey, wasn’t that the whole point of it anyway (except for the ka-CHING factor)?
The second set of books showed the effects of their products primary mechanism of action (that of viral infection). It showed adverse outcomes in numbers and types unlike anything seen for traditional viral protein vaccines, which, of course, they used to claim it could be from THEIR product because, you know, everybody knows that vaccines don’t behave that way and their product was simply a vaccine, simply giving the body the instructions IT needed to “build immunity.”
Except that the extreme increase in adverse events including death from many different causes were only among the product-plus people, not the product-minus negative controls that had been injected with buffered saline.
Except that, when the tests populations were unblinded and those of either could choose to remain in their group or switch to the other, those of the negative control group who chose to switch to the product-plus group started experiencing all the adverse outcomes including falling dead in number far greater than anything seen among people who actually suffered an infection with the C19 virus.
It was this second book of effects that Pfizer tried to have sealed for the next 75 years.
The outcome?
Go totally fucking nuts getting as many people injected as many times as possible?
Why?
1. Because if something’s happening everywhere that normally never happens with vaccines, then it couldn’t be them because they were only producing vaccines.
2. The too big to fail concept combined with their immunological version of planned obsolescence combined with immunity would save their asses.
3. Stalin’s concept (paraphrased): you kill a few people, it’s murder; you kill ten million, it’s a statistic.
And THAT’S why things happened as they did and how we’ve come to the point that over 5.61 billion people, more than two thirds of the entire human race, have been shot up between 1 and 6 times with C19 genes, in a shorter time, in more organ systems of their bodies, with more serious consequences than the virus itself could ever have done.
And after you’ve comprehended the monstrosity of that, then consider that not only are they still doing it, they are expanding the use of EXACTLY the same primary mechanism of action to replace existing vaccines and create even more for diseases for which no successful protein vaccine has ever been created.
Now, THAT last paragraph does not describe the advancement of medicine but the attempted hegemony of an international death cult using the instrumentalities of law and government to impose itself on the entire human population--well, except for its own members it’s deemed worthy to inherit the earth and everything the soon to be departed have created.
Remember that Pfizer had earlier made a traditional viral protein vaccine against the Coronavirus now called Covid-19. It “failed.”
But here’s why it failed.
If there is a virus that is a member of a very closely-related family of Coronaviruses
1. against which almost 60% of the population is already resistant,
2. from the effects of which almost no one from the vast majority of the population dies or even notices much of anything,
3. the effects of which are found principally among a very small percentage of the population consisting of very old, very sick people with these characteristics:
a. they had on average almost 3 comorbid conditions,
b. they usually were deficient in serum vitamin D,
c. they tended to have age-related anergy of the adaptive immune system, meaning they were impaired in their ability to make much of a response to viral antigens in a traditional viral protein vaccine to create specific antibodies and killer T cells,
then there would be serious problems showing any efficacy of any traditional viral protein vaccine, especially if the test population chosen was created to be representative of the entire population.
Why?
A number of reasons:
1. The majority of folks in the broad population were already resistant to the virus
2. It didn’t have much of an effect on those it did infect,
3. If your test population is representative of the general population, then the relatively tiny portion of the population more significantly affected by the virus would be an extremely small percentage of your test population,
4. if your test population is representative of the general population, then the portion of the population that could actually die from it, being themselves a relatively small portion of the already small portion in three above, is going to be an even tinier number of your test population.
So you’d be starting out with a test population pretty much guaranteed to show little, if any, effects of the virus. Because of this, you’d see little, if any, of the effects of a viral protein vaccine.
And of the microscopic number of your test population the ones that could be badly affected by it were mostly those who were unable to benefit from any kind of traditional viral protein vaccine. Because of this, you’d see little, if any, difference, in terms of death from the virus, between the product-plus and product-minus parts of your test population.
Pfizer’s conclusion: the viral protein vaccine failed. But it didn’t fail so much as its effects weren’t needed among the majority of the population because they were already resistant because of exposure to other closely-related Coronaviruses and there couldn’t be much of an effect on those who really needed protection against the virus because they were constitutively incapable of generating a large enough adaptive immune response to make any difference.
So that was a product DOA as far as FDA testing protocols to demonstrate efficacy are concerned.
Question 1: So what was different about the 2020 version of Covid-19?
Answer 1:
A. As far as the virus and who and how it affected, nothing at all.
B. As far as the brouhaha in the news was concerned, an effing huge deal.
Question 2: So what were the chances that Pfizer could dust off its previous trials with the traditional viral protein vaccine against that virus and get an approval?
Answer 2: None at all. The results looked definitive, so why bother? Besides, if they repeated it, craploads of money, time, and opportunity to make it big because of 1B above would be lost.
Question 3: So what could Pfizer do to make things look different?
Answer 3:
a. They would come up with a different method to get a lot of viral protein antigen into people
b. This way would avoid scrutiny of their “failed” earlier attempts with a traditional viral protein vaccine (see David Martin),
c. This way would at least give them an advantage over any other manufacturers because they already knew how that approach would turn out and they would look like they were doing something bold, new, and different,
d. This one would be able to bypass the traditional viral protein vaccine testing requirement because it was fundamentally different,
e. This one could take advantage of the media whipping public opinion into a frenzy of fear over literally nothing out of the ordinary and get classified to be used under EUA guidelines and probably would be granted that because they could show that it did, indeed, result in the presence of viral antigen against which specific antibodies and killer T cells could be made, so that meant that outcome was like a vaccine,
f. Because their earlier tests had shown little difference from other viral proteins in terms of adverse events, they assumed or they just spun it that this would have little to none, either, because, hey, it resulted in viral antigens and antibodies and T cells like a “real” vaccine is supposed to, so it must pose no significant risks, either.
Sure, it was a stupid and illogical assumption, especially considering that its primary mechanism of action was wholly different from a traditional viral protein vaccine. Actually, exactly like that of viral infection, but, hey, all that could be dealt with because A. of the supposed existential threat the dread Covid-19 virus posed to humanity and B. EUAs didn’t require complete testing, only enough to show the product in question probably could do the job and the presence of viral antigen, just like a vaccine, and specific antibodies and T cells, just like a vaccine, were sufficient to meet the test of B and the crisis of A seemed to fully warrant B.
And there you have it. The other companies, who knew what Pfizer already knew, adopted similar approaches. Hey, with at least 7 different cell transfection reagents and techniques, there were plenty to go around.
Of them, those companies chose the ones that would be cheapest, most easy to administer in an outpatient in vivo approach, and most similar to traditional viral protein vaccines to play off existing acceptance and familiarity of most of the public.
Here we go Dr Alexander. I cut and pasted part of the article poster today by
“MedicalKidnap.com. As you had posted last week about an unconfirmed meeting, well that meeting did in fact happen. Below is part of the article. I’ll post the full article on my Substack homepage.
December 17, 2024
Print This Post Print This Post
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Betrays Entire “Health Freedom” Movement for Personal Gain
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. was invited to a dinner party with President-elect Donald Trump last week, where he met with executives from Big Pharma, including Robert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, who made $billions under Trump's first term, by securing from Trump an FDA emergency-use authorization for the first COVID-19 injections for the U.S., along with exclusive distributor rights in Israel for Pfizer's deadly COVID-19 "vaccine." Also attending the dinner at Trump's residence in Florida was his Chief of Staff, Susie Wiles, who is also a lobbyist for Pfizer. Did anyone really expect that Trump could nominate RFK, Jr. without Bourla's approval? The day Trump announced he was appointing RFK, Jr. as head of HHS, Pfizer's stock dropped 10% in value. However, after meeting with Trump and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, along with Trump's chief of staff who also works for Pfizer, Susie Wiles, all of a sudden now RFK, Jr. and Bourla are great friends. This was just published today by Reuters: PFIZER DOES NOT EXPECT MAJOR VACCINE POLICY CHANGES UNDER TRUMP IN 2025 - Pfizer on Tuesday said it does not expect the Trump administration to make major changes to vaccine policy next year even as the president-elect has put forward vaccine skeptic Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as his nominee to run the Department of Health and Human Services. Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla told analysts at an investor conference that he had met RFK Jr. and Trump for dinner, confirming earlier media reports, and had developed a good relationship with Kennedy. "If he's confirmed, we will work with him to make sure that we advance the right policies," Bourla said.
It's lucky for him Mangione, if it was him who shot the CEO in NYC, was apprehended or he could have been next. Anything that happens to Boutla should happen lawfully, but what probably will happen is that he'll be given another medal.
These people need to be prosecuted AND exposed…there’s millions of people taking medications that have been approved and shouldn’t have been, and people still don’t know. We’ve been conditioned to ignore the small print endless list of side effects. This is not ok.
exactly
one can argue that maybe just maybe most of the drugs and vaccines approved by FDA cannot pass a proper unbiased regulatory approval
will be actually shown ineffective and unsafe
And there are people who can't get medications that are life saving, or can't get claims approved by health insurers that should be approved. That's the other side of the coin to people taking medications that are wrongly approved.
Heinz Dilemma
https://youtu.be/ALE5H9Byms0?si=fofTV1jc59yhyWoG
Exactly, well said. Many would benefit from HBOT, but no way can they get it. Of course we all know about hydroxychloroquine, fenbendazole, and ivermectin too.
boom, HBOT is incredible and is remarkable out of reach
A bigger question is, "why aren't people turning to alternative care rather then constantly relying on toxic drugs from the rockefeller medical cartel?"
Drugs are not the answer except in an emergency situation - life or death, which most "illnesses"/diseases are not. Most people have been programed (yes, brainwashed and programed) to believe that the "food" they eat is fine, they can be lazy so others will take care of whatever for them, and the drugs are the answer to all their ailments. None of that is true unless you're big tech, big "food", pHARMa. We are apart of nature and thus, nature is the answer for healing ailments NOT drugs.
"We’ve been conditioned to ignore the small print endless list of side effects. This is not ok."
IMO I would say we've been also conditioned to not act and live naturally, which means lots of movement, hard work (but not too hard), sufficient sun exposure, agility, speed, food gathering, fasting, proper rests, caring for your family, social networks, rituals, religions etc.
We have basically the same instincts and genes but the environment is much more toxic, including all kinds of chemicals, drugs, dirty air, ground, smartphones, electromagnetic radiation etc. Surely Kennedy is into these things. The problem alsis that big pharma and top-down "public health" buaucrats try to say "mRNA no mandats, but stop at our traditional vaccines" as if this is some TABOO topic. The more resistence there is, the more you know that they try to hide something.
Only after people are sick you come to the question of how you can heal them. First you would need to stop making them sick, therefore its totally warranted that Kennedy wants to go after the garbage put into US citizens. Imo he should NOT stop with food and water, but also go against traditional vaccines, mRNA shots, medical drugs, putting proper SCIENCE (as far as its even possible in these non-hard science fields) and FREEDOM as the basis of everything. You would need an open market where the best treatments, drugs (even natural or otherwise proven) wins in the evidence based scheme, and you wont try to force-apply some experimental military-grade LNP mRNA injection into every human. Who is so insane advocating for such top-down approach? Its insanity. 100% madness. Nothing can justify it except if you have Chinese motives, which means controlling and excerting control over every body that lives in your land. This is a problem, they admire China for its control, big data, AI usage, social credit system, pandemic control etc. The see it as better for biodefense, because people just do what they are told and force is just applied.
The land of the free becomes the land of the enslaved, just like every other nation. The US should be last land to fall. Good Trump is here now, but the dangers arent away (he could even supercharge the expansion). TECH is always here and expands. China is portrait as the role model. 100% distributed TECH + sensors + total surveillance + big data + AI + competitive edge, better for biodefense no? You just push ONE BUTTON and the whole society is SHUT DOWN / LOCKED DOWN, this is the aspiration. The moment everything is 100% digital and gov controlled, the control will be TOTAL. So you have to fight against tech (somehwhat), so people remain in control and free, while you still have the advantages of tech.
very informative
IMO I would say we've been also conditioned to not act and live naturally, which means lots of movement, hard work (but not too hard), sufficient sun exposure, agility, speed, food gathering, fasting, proper rests, caring for your family, social networks, rituals, religions etc.
When those pushing these treatments / enhancement of viral mechanisms as I call them, those pushing them rely on half the population to simply go along with their solution.
Two friends of mine were prescribed Paxlovid. Yes they both have now been tested three times positive for COVID! WOW, who would have thunk?
Good God! I sent them article after article about the failures of this drug. Obviously, to no avail! If society is unwilling to do their own research for whatever reason, then IMO, society gets what it’s deserved!
This may sound cruel. In one sense it’s very cruel. But nothing is more cruel than a doctor who is willing to subject their patients to a treatment which they should know has failed!
RSV is another example. Back in 1967 children died! Yet Moderna decides, we’re going to get it right. Once again, failure. I’m not sure any vaccine has benefits which outweigh the risk? Then again I’m not an expert.
But I do know when it’s raining and when I’m being pissed on! So should everybody. Research then decide. Maybe more doctors should schedule less patients for more research.
This is what’s become of our medical profession. Political BS, govt. overreach, etc!. Not for the betterment of society, no, no, no, for the betterment of, you guessed it, money! And more money! It’s not about anything but money! And power of course.
May God Bless America and The Entire World!
AJR
This may sound cruel. In one sense it’s very cruel. But nothing is more cruel than a doctor who is willing to subject their patients to a treatment which they should know has failed!
boom excellent post, doctors are the real drug pushers
drug pharma industry is like cancer research, the entity is a fraud...it is a business.
'This is what’s become of our medical profession. Political BS, govt. overreach, etc!. Not for the betterment of society, no, no, no, for the betterment of, you guessed it, money! And more money! It’s not about anything but money! And power of course.'
$$$$$
Doesnt Peter McCullough recommend paxlovid in his protocols?
Not that I’m aware of. Nattekanose, Bromliead and one other. My spelling is way off
https://www.villagepharmacytn.com/copy-of-covid-19-resources
This what I have seen before
the DOI is DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm.2020.04.264 for the original paper....go to it and open the pdf in full, go to page 522, that is the original chart algorithm...there is no paxlovid or Molnupiravir and the evidence emerged that paxlovid and molnupiravir is ineffective and causes rebound and mutations etc. a person can with their doctor make their decisions what they wish to take but I am not in support of paxlovid and molnupiravir as two failed dangerous drugs. I WONT take it nor suggest anyone take it. the DOI I cited sbove is the key DOI to go off of and also, no doubt it is updated today to reflect nasal oral washes such as povidone and h peroxide, saline rinse, xylitol etc. and again, we know much more today how to manage this clinically...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33387997/
is paxlovid or Molnupiravir in the chart on page 522? No.
The aim then of the early treatment was to pivot from single drug to SMDT regimens that should be employed as a critical strategy
to deal with any acute COVID-19 patients with the aim of reducing the intensity and duration of symptoms and avoiding hospitalization and death. key was to prevent you from entering hospital where the risk of death escalates dramatically especially for elderly high risk persons. but remember, doctors chose to do nothing, deny antibiotics (which was a key aspect of the regimen and anti-coagulants as it was more a blood clotting illness) and leave patients to die...send them home. so the approach was we try using repurposed therapeutics, that were safe, effective, regulatory approved, available, to save lives. multi pronged attack.
Yes that chart shows Paxlovid, would be interesting to hear an explanation.
Peter does not ascribe to paxlovid or molnu
John, Here’s the McCullough protocol for spike detoxification.
I found it reading the current post from Dr Alexander.
1) Base Spike Detoxification (combined bromelain, natto kinase, curcumin) 2) Colchicine 3) 3 months of steroids, 4) rapamycin. McCullough’s own personal patient experience is that the spike detoxification plus colchicine shows tangible improvement in similar with no heart failure or cardiac arrest developing.
yes this is it
Might have to do with Paxlovid costing over $500 a treatment course while Ivermectin is cheaper than the packaging that it's shipped in.
The medical system is corrupt to the core and has been for over 40 years.
boom
Actually, longer than that. Go back to the beginning of the AMA
love this you are right
I believe it’s because FDA stands for
“Fraudulent Data Analysis!”
As what they do is push “fraudulent” treatments without proper proof of effectiveness, proper anything for that matter.
As long as it properly addresses the
“bank-accounts” heck what’s the big deal, right? Life doesn’t matter! Life, those useless eaters, have more than they need! “NEXT!”
This is how, this is why, this is where America and the American People find themselves today!
Trust in our
“Brilliantly Designed God Given Immunity!”
Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ knew how evil man would become which is exactly why He developed our natural immunity so well. Of course there’s always the question about “GOF” or a manmade virus, deliberately sending our God Given Immunity into overdrive!
Trust not “Man!” Trust only our Lord Jesus!
I am so sick of being lied to over and over and over again! This is how low man has descended! Shamefully low!
May God Bless America and The Entire World!
AJR
I love this post AJR...strikes all the right chords...
Trust in our
“Brilliantly Designed God Given Immunity!”
Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ knew how evil man would become which is exactly why He developed our natural immunity so well. Of course there’s always the question about “GOF” or a manmade virus, deliberately sending our God Given Immunity into overdrive!
Trust not “Man!” Trust only our Lord Jesus!
Thank you Dr. Alexander. I am very grateful.
AJR
Amen! Trust God! Our God-given Immune system is amazing, and a reflection of His love for us!
"Clouds" (by Barry Maguire) (spell?) Reminds me of that song--the Lord's coming back soon! Jesus is Lord!
The FDA must be completely gutted and started over. Start with a mission of what they do and how they do it and what associated behaviors are needed (eg honesty, integrity, open mindedness) etc.). Any deviation from these behaviors will result in immediate dismissal.
burn it to the floor...complete...send all home and start over
We have got to end this corruption and fraud in the pharmacy industry. It's ridiculous how much dangerous meds are approved just for profit and kickbacks and under table deals.
Seems no one in pharma or govt ever truly gets prison for this crap. Pelosi has been insider trading, steering money to her husband, etc for decades as has many others. We all know how the Clinton foundation was used for illegal donations like selling uranium to Russia.
Long prison sentences and new strong laws on vaccine and med testing and approval are needed.
we want them to be jailed, all of them...long prison sentences
Whatever amount those kickbacks were, they must have been exhorbitant. I heard of lame-assed doctor somewhere who was offered $1 million up front and $50 thousand a month just to keep his big mouth shut on all things Covid-19... I gotta go take care of some animals. At least they don't kill their own kind.
I wonder what that scientist did?
I'm sure he was up to no good.
"How much kickback $$$ did Bourla give?" Answer: as much as they had to!
The criminal entities of Big Pharma rake in hundreds of billions every year. A few million here, and a few million there, are a drop in the bucket to keep the gravy train rolling.
Which once again I remind you of why there is NO ALTERNATIVE --- we either take THEM out, or they will take US out. They will NEVER repent ... they will NEVER stop. Why would they? They have too much to gain $$$, and almost nothing to lose (no legal consequences).
excellent post: 'Which once again I remind you of why there is NO ALTERNATIVE --- we either take THEM out, or they will take US out. They will NEVER repent ... they will NEVER stop. Why would they? They have too much to gain $$$, and almost nothing to lose (no legal consequences).'
SATANIC DRIVEN PIGS NEED TO BE ANNIHILATED
Any doctor prescribing Paxlovid should be prosecuted. To make things more criminal, small pharmacy's pay 1600 for a 30 pc prescription yet are only reimbursed $800 on a good day. I think we are on the rollerball agenda.
boom, and do hard jail time
Maybe that was their plan right from the start.
Part II
So that left out:
1. using tiny needles to inject single cells with viral mRNA, INEFFECTIVE
2. using electric shock to make cells leaky enough so the viral plasmids could get in to be used to run off mRNA, SCARY AND UNPLEASANT,
3. using ultrasound to drive the vehicles containing the viral mRNA into cells where it could do its thing--hey, hospitals were having a hard enough time getting ventilators they were being told they HAD to have to handle the millions that would shortly be struck down by C19, so how in the world could they come up with that many ultrasound machines AND technicians AND training, so WAY TOO EXPENSIVE,
4. using powerful magnetic fields to do what 3 did would be even more expensive than 3 to the degree that an MRI machine is more expensive than an ultrasound machine and since you couldn’t coerce a lot of people to get naked and crawl inside a claustrophobic tube with a lot of scary banging, you’d have to develop more portable versions for just an arm and how much frigging money was THAT going to cost--and you can BET there were equipment manufacturers creaming their accounts receivable jeans over the prospects.
But Pfizer and the others were already familiar with the the nanoparticle, lipid moiety, and replication-disabled adenovirus cell transfection reagents from decades-long use with immortal cell lines in molecular biology labs to get proteins expressed in living cells for study.
They were totally familiar with PCR from decades of use that they could use to whip up huge amounts of spike protein genes to introduce in a variety of ways via the transfection reagents.
They were totally familiar with the work of Robert Malone introducing exogenous gene constructs into cells in vivo for therapeutic purposes either to supply what was lacking due to a mutant gene (the lack of which protein caused a disease state) or to silence a defective gene from being expressed (the presence of which defective protein caused a disease state). So they knew it could be appropriated for their NON-THERAPEUTIC approach of artificially infecting cells with viral genes, ostensibly to produce the same outcomes as traditional protein vaccines, but actually to make absolutely gigantic shitloads of money for them from the whole world clamoring to be saved from a virus they already knew posed no threat at all, well, except to a very small percentage of the population an even smaller percentage of which was always getting knocked off year in, year out by one or another of the almost 200 common cold viruses of flu. So big deal.
BUT, and here is the BIG but--their products acted exactly like one-gene artificial viruses infecting healthy cells indiscriminately (except for AstraZeneca) and provoking widespread, multi-system innate immune inflammatory attacks with the same serious immunological consequences as broadly-disseminated viral infections.
These companies knew THAT, but they concealed it.
Their experimental trials had two sets of books.
The first set showed what would be looked for in terms of outcomes for a viral protein vaccine: it showed the presence of viral antigens and antibodies and T cells. Okay, it also showed no reductions in death between product-plus and product-minus groups, just like Pfizer’s previous testing with their traditional viral protein vaccine. And it showed that people could still get C19 but, they claimed, it was a kinder and gentler form, meaning they would be less likely to die from it and, hey, wasn’t that the whole point of it anyway (except for the ka-CHING factor)?
The second set of books showed the effects of their products primary mechanism of action (that of viral infection). It showed adverse outcomes in numbers and types unlike anything seen for traditional viral protein vaccines, which, of course, they used to claim it could be from THEIR product because, you know, everybody knows that vaccines don’t behave that way and their product was simply a vaccine, simply giving the body the instructions IT needed to “build immunity.”
Except that the extreme increase in adverse events including death from many different causes were only among the product-plus people, not the product-minus negative controls that had been injected with buffered saline.
Except that, when the tests populations were unblinded and those of either could choose to remain in their group or switch to the other, those of the negative control group who chose to switch to the product-plus group started experiencing all the adverse outcomes including falling dead in number far greater than anything seen among people who actually suffered an infection with the C19 virus.
It was this second book of effects that Pfizer tried to have sealed for the next 75 years.
The outcome?
Go totally fucking nuts getting as many people injected as many times as possible?
Why?
1. Because if something’s happening everywhere that normally never happens with vaccines, then it couldn’t be them because they were only producing vaccines.
2. The too big to fail concept combined with their immunological version of planned obsolescence combined with immunity would save their asses.
3. Stalin’s concept (paraphrased): you kill a few people, it’s murder; you kill ten million, it’s a statistic.
And THAT’S why things happened as they did and how we’ve come to the point that over 5.61 billion people, more than two thirds of the entire human race, have been shot up between 1 and 6 times with C19 genes, in a shorter time, in more organ systems of their bodies, with more serious consequences than the virus itself could ever have done.
And after you’ve comprehended the monstrosity of that, then consider that not only are they still doing it, they are expanding the use of EXACTLY the same primary mechanism of action to replace existing vaccines and create even more for diseases for which no successful protein vaccine has ever been created.
Now, THAT last paragraph does not describe the advancement of medicine but the attempted hegemony of an international death cult using the instrumentalities of law and government to impose itself on the entire human population--well, except for its own members it’s deemed worthy to inherit the earth and everything the soon to be departed have created.
Part I
Remember that Pfizer had earlier made a traditional viral protein vaccine against the Coronavirus now called Covid-19. It “failed.”
But here’s why it failed.
If there is a virus that is a member of a very closely-related family of Coronaviruses
1. against which almost 60% of the population is already resistant,
2. from the effects of which almost no one from the vast majority of the population dies or even notices much of anything,
3. the effects of which are found principally among a very small percentage of the population consisting of very old, very sick people with these characteristics:
a. they had on average almost 3 comorbid conditions,
b. they usually were deficient in serum vitamin D,
c. they tended to have age-related anergy of the adaptive immune system, meaning they were impaired in their ability to make much of a response to viral antigens in a traditional viral protein vaccine to create specific antibodies and killer T cells,
then there would be serious problems showing any efficacy of any traditional viral protein vaccine, especially if the test population chosen was created to be representative of the entire population.
Why?
A number of reasons:
1. The majority of folks in the broad population were already resistant to the virus
2. It didn’t have much of an effect on those it did infect,
3. If your test population is representative of the general population, then the relatively tiny portion of the population more significantly affected by the virus would be an extremely small percentage of your test population,
4. if your test population is representative of the general population, then the portion of the population that could actually die from it, being themselves a relatively small portion of the already small portion in three above, is going to be an even tinier number of your test population.
So you’d be starting out with a test population pretty much guaranteed to show little, if any, effects of the virus. Because of this, you’d see little, if any, of the effects of a viral protein vaccine.
And of the microscopic number of your test population the ones that could be badly affected by it were mostly those who were unable to benefit from any kind of traditional viral protein vaccine. Because of this, you’d see little, if any, difference, in terms of death from the virus, between the product-plus and product-minus parts of your test population.
Pfizer’s conclusion: the viral protein vaccine failed. But it didn’t fail so much as its effects weren’t needed among the majority of the population because they were already resistant because of exposure to other closely-related Coronaviruses and there couldn’t be much of an effect on those who really needed protection against the virus because they were constitutively incapable of generating a large enough adaptive immune response to make any difference.
So that was a product DOA as far as FDA testing protocols to demonstrate efficacy are concerned.
Question 1: So what was different about the 2020 version of Covid-19?
Answer 1:
A. As far as the virus and who and how it affected, nothing at all.
B. As far as the brouhaha in the news was concerned, an effing huge deal.
Question 2: So what were the chances that Pfizer could dust off its previous trials with the traditional viral protein vaccine against that virus and get an approval?
Answer 2: None at all. The results looked definitive, so why bother? Besides, if they repeated it, craploads of money, time, and opportunity to make it big because of 1B above would be lost.
Question 3: So what could Pfizer do to make things look different?
Answer 3:
a. They would come up with a different method to get a lot of viral protein antigen into people
b. This way would avoid scrutiny of their “failed” earlier attempts with a traditional viral protein vaccine (see David Martin),
c. This way would at least give them an advantage over any other manufacturers because they already knew how that approach would turn out and they would look like they were doing something bold, new, and different,
d. This one would be able to bypass the traditional viral protein vaccine testing requirement because it was fundamentally different,
e. This one could take advantage of the media whipping public opinion into a frenzy of fear over literally nothing out of the ordinary and get classified to be used under EUA guidelines and probably would be granted that because they could show that it did, indeed, result in the presence of viral antigen against which specific antibodies and killer T cells could be made, so that meant that outcome was like a vaccine,
f. Because their earlier tests had shown little difference from other viral proteins in terms of adverse events, they assumed or they just spun it that this would have little to none, either, because, hey, it resulted in viral antigens and antibodies and T cells like a “real” vaccine is supposed to, so it must pose no significant risks, either.
Sure, it was a stupid and illogical assumption, especially considering that its primary mechanism of action was wholly different from a traditional viral protein vaccine. Actually, exactly like that of viral infection, but, hey, all that could be dealt with because A. of the supposed existential threat the dread Covid-19 virus posed to humanity and B. EUAs didn’t require complete testing, only enough to show the product in question probably could do the job and the presence of viral antigen, just like a vaccine, and specific antibodies and T cells, just like a vaccine, were sufficient to meet the test of B and the crisis of A seemed to fully warrant B.
And there you have it. The other companies, who knew what Pfizer already knew, adopted similar approaches. Hey, with at least 7 different cell transfection reagents and techniques, there were plenty to go around.
Of them, those companies chose the ones that would be cheapest, most easy to administer in an outpatient in vivo approach, and most similar to traditional viral protein vaccines to play off existing acceptance and familiarity of most of the public.
Here we go Dr Alexander. I cut and pasted part of the article poster today by
“MedicalKidnap.com. As you had posted last week about an unconfirmed meeting, well that meeting did in fact happen. Below is part of the article. I’ll post the full article on my Substack homepage.
December 17, 2024
Print This Post Print This Post
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Betrays Entire “Health Freedom” Movement for Personal Gain
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. was invited to a dinner party with President-elect Donald Trump last week, where he met with executives from Big Pharma, including Robert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, who made $billions under Trump's first term, by securing from Trump an FDA emergency-use authorization for the first COVID-19 injections for the U.S., along with exclusive distributor rights in Israel for Pfizer's deadly COVID-19 "vaccine." Also attending the dinner at Trump's residence in Florida was his Chief of Staff, Susie Wiles, who is also a lobbyist for Pfizer. Did anyone really expect that Trump could nominate RFK, Jr. without Bourla's approval? The day Trump announced he was appointing RFK, Jr. as head of HHS, Pfizer's stock dropped 10% in value. However, after meeting with Trump and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, along with Trump's chief of staff who also works for Pfizer, Susie Wiles, all of a sudden now RFK, Jr. and Bourla are great friends. This was just published today by Reuters: PFIZER DOES NOT EXPECT MAJOR VACCINE POLICY CHANGES UNDER TRUMP IN 2025 - Pfizer on Tuesday said it does not expect the Trump administration to make major changes to vaccine policy next year even as the president-elect has put forward vaccine skeptic Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as his nominee to run the Department of Health and Human Services. Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla told analysts at an investor conference that he had met RFK Jr. and Trump for dinner, confirming earlier media reports, and had developed a good relationship with Kennedy. "If he's confirmed, we will work with him to make sure that we advance the right policies," Bourla said.
Fuck Pfizer and Bourla. That prick deserves a visit to a Guillotine.Heads in Baskets...
It's lucky for him Mangione, if it was him who shot the CEO in NYC, was apprehended or he could have been next. Anything that happens to Boutla should happen lawfully, but what probably will happen is that he'll be given another medal.
Absolutely John! The article I posted this morning says it all. It confirms what Dr Alexander posted last week about the meeting at Mar-Largo.
I’m nearly certain Trump is part of this entire OWS / Bioweapon Injections!
I hope I’m wrong but too many dots are connecting
I hope you are wrong too.
I've heard many different versions of that meeting, don't know what to believe
Dr. Bay was suspended after he openly criticised the government's COVID policies and organised protests against the restrictions.
Despite being left in the dark and denied a fair trial, he stood his ground — and now the system has to pay for its abuse of power.
Make sure you share Dr. Bay's incredible story and why we must never let this happen again.
THIS WAS AUSTRALIA----MAKE IT HAPPEN WORLDWIDE!