This is an utterly revisionist take. No President ever had more backbone, more 'stones.' And I won't bother going through the very long list of counter evidence, which, I notice here, you have conveniently ignored. But I will take one of your potentially valid points: It was precisely his "looking out for the American people" that l…
This is an utterly revisionist take. No President ever had more backbone, more 'stones.' And I won't bother going through the very long list of counter evidence, which, I notice here, you have conveniently ignored. But I will take one of your potentially valid points: It was precisely his "looking out for the American people" that led him into this decision. He was played by forces who are enemies of the American people an evil n government he couldn't imagine, so foreign is that degree of treason to his mind. And they knew his personal disposition in this regard and sold him the faux 'vaccine' as a means to serving those people. Evil knows how to redirect even our best intentions. You would do well to begin the serious reflection that might clear away your historical and analytical confusion.
This is an utterly revisionist take. No President ever had more backbone, more 'stones.' And I won't bother going through the very long list of counter evidence, which, I notice here, you have conveniently ignored. But I will take one of your potentially valid points: It was precisely his "looking out for the American people" that led him into this decision. He was played by forces who are enemies of the American people an evil n government he couldn't imagine, so foreign is that degree of treason to his mind. And they knew his personal disposition in this regard and sold him the faux 'vaccine' as a means to serving those people. Evil knows how to redirect even our best intentions. You would do well to begin the serious reflection that might clear away your historical and analytical confusion.