Please remember that many months ago I pointed out to you the weirdness of Malone and other scientists criticizing Covid Inc sharing with Covid Inc an almost complete silence about the primary mechanism of action of the viral RNA products, all of which were off-label uses of cell transfection reagents long used in molecular biology resea…
Please remember that many months ago I pointed out to you the weirdness of Malone and other scientists criticizing Covid Inc sharing with Covid Inc an almost complete silence about the primary mechanism of action of the viral RNA products, all of which were off-label uses of cell transfection reagents long used in molecular biology research.
I said it was weird because Malone (and others in the group meeting with Sen. Ron Johnson) had to have been intimately familiar with those reagents from their own work (including my own doctoral and post doc work), both standard mol bio lab work with in vitro stable cell lines and Malone’s work in the therapeutic use of mRNA, either to suppress defective gene products that caused disease or to supply missing gene products, the relative lack of which caused disease.
The Covid Inc use of these reagents, however, was to invade healthy cells indiscriminately in multiple organ systems and to infect them with pathogenic viral genes. The inevitable outcome of this is triggering those product-compromised cells to signal the innate immune system to launch innate immune inflammatory attacks to kill those cells because they appear, due to the presence of C19 viral mRNA and C19 viral protein, to have been infected by a virus.
But there was no clear discussion by Covid Inc or its critics about the primary mechanism of action and its role in inflammatory conditions.
I pointed out that it was no mystery why Covid Inc was so mum about this because they were trying to push the notion of their products as being nothing more than “vaccines” rather than artificial equivalents of an indiscriminate viral infection in multiple organ systems.
I said that perhaps the reason Malone and others were silent about the primary mechanism of action of the viral RNA products was that they were a misuse of cell transfection reagents that were the backbone of modern molecular biology and didn’t want criticism for their misuse to be indiscriminately applied to molecular biological research.
But you said Malone was an honorable man. And now you’ve gone 180 degrees from your earlier characterization, but you still appear to have not picked up on the cell transfection reagents’ infection with viral genes as the primary cause of most of the adverse outcomes seen in those shot up with it.
Please remember that many months ago I pointed out to you the weirdness of Malone and other scientists criticizing Covid Inc sharing with Covid Inc an almost complete silence about the primary mechanism of action of the viral RNA products, all of which were off-label uses of cell transfection reagents long used in molecular biology research.
I said it was weird because Malone (and others in the group meeting with Sen. Ron Johnson) had to have been intimately familiar with those reagents from their own work (including my own doctoral and post doc work), both standard mol bio lab work with in vitro stable cell lines and Malone’s work in the therapeutic use of mRNA, either to suppress defective gene products that caused disease or to supply missing gene products, the relative lack of which caused disease.
The Covid Inc use of these reagents, however, was to invade healthy cells indiscriminately in multiple organ systems and to infect them with pathogenic viral genes. The inevitable outcome of this is triggering those product-compromised cells to signal the innate immune system to launch innate immune inflammatory attacks to kill those cells because they appear, due to the presence of C19 viral mRNA and C19 viral protein, to have been infected by a virus.
But there was no clear discussion by Covid Inc or its critics about the primary mechanism of action and its role in inflammatory conditions.
I pointed out that it was no mystery why Covid Inc was so mum about this because they were trying to push the notion of their products as being nothing more than “vaccines” rather than artificial equivalents of an indiscriminate viral infection in multiple organ systems.
I said that perhaps the reason Malone and others were silent about the primary mechanism of action of the viral RNA products was that they were a misuse of cell transfection reagents that were the backbone of modern molecular biology and didn’t want criticism for their misuse to be indiscriminately applied to molecular biological research.
But you said Malone was an honorable man. And now you’ve gone 180 degrees from your earlier characterization, but you still appear to have not picked up on the cell transfection reagents’ infection with viral genes as the primary cause of most of the adverse outcomes seen in those shot up with it.