dolts, technically inept, academically sloppy, for you knew, you 6 especially Malone & Bourla that the COVID mRNA vaccine induces ANTIBODIES 'systemically' (SYSTEMIC COMPARTMENT aka blood stream)
Perhaps the MRNA VACCINE was needed to achieves different goal and not made to help fight COVID 19. Was there something the powers that be wanted circulating in our blood? The white clots that have killed so many? The self—assembling graphene nano structures for future downloading info to our bodies? Does anyone know?
No, we don’t need any “vaccine” ever! They knew this was a bio weapon against humanity. They knew. Well in advance. Maloney baloney knows he worked with the US government to help create a bio weapon. He knows who he works for. He is a sociopath hiding in plain sight behind the medical freedom movement. We see who he truly is. He’s not fooling the majority of us. Enjoy your horse farm Maloney. Your ill gotten gains. What a pathetic POS!
And where have you been? You are talking about something well-known for many years. All specific antibodies made by the adaptive immune system are humoral antibodies. They are not exported from the body for EVA work.
NO vaccine-induced specific antibodies are capable of preventing anyone from getting infected. They only work AFTER you’ve been infected. The goal is that they will help prevent a clinical case of infection from developing. They have been very effective at that.
The viral RNA products, though, actually infect indiscriminately with viral genes any cells anywhere they bump into. Viral protein vaccine do not do this. The viral RNA products cause each of those product-compromised cells to signal the innate immune system to launch innate immune inflammatory attacks to kill those cells. Viral protein vaccines do not do this.
It appears that if you’re not looking in the wrong direction then you’re drawing incomplete and/or irrelevant conclusions that only muddy the issue.
Malone and others used a standard technique of cell transfection common to all molecular biology labs in one way.
Pfizer and the others used that standard technique in another way.
What Pfizer and the others did was known from the beginning to be an unprecedented, dangerous way that infected healthy cells in multiple organ systems indiscriminately with pathogenic viral genes. The completely expected immunological outcome of this was to trigger the innate immune system to launch innate immune inflammatory attacks everywhere those cells were located to kill the cells.
This was not the intent of the en vivo therapeutic use of mRNA used by Malone, et al.
To claim that they should be punished for the other things that others did with the cell transfection techniques that existed before Malone ever got the idea of a therapeutic en vivo use of mRNA is as absurd as trying to prosecute Ford Motor Company for some get away driver’s use of a Pinto in a bank robbery. Well, actually, it’s as absurd as trying to bust a famous stock car driver for driving a model of Ford van that was later used by some jihadist Muslim asshole to run down a bunch of civilians on a city park walking path.
thanks much. then your boy should be able to answer our questions. not hide the Freedom movement and not sue everyone. I am being basic here, you know Malone did wrong...
Please remember that many months ago I pointed out to you the weirdness of Malone and other scientists criticizing Covid Inc sharing with Covid Inc an almost complete silence about the primary mechanism of action of the viral RNA products, all of which were off-label uses of cell transfection reagents long used in molecular biology research.
I said it was weird because Malone (and others in the group meeting with Sen. Ron Johnson) had to have been intimately familiar with those reagents from their own work (including my own doctoral and post doc work), both standard mol bio lab work with in vitro stable cell lines and Malone’s work in the therapeutic use of mRNA, either to suppress defective gene products that caused disease or to supply missing gene products, the relative lack of which caused disease.
The Covid Inc use of these reagents, however, was to invade healthy cells indiscriminately in multiple organ systems and to infect them with pathogenic viral genes. The inevitable outcome of this is triggering those product-compromised cells to signal the innate immune system to launch innate immune inflammatory attacks to kill those cells because they appear, due to the presence of C19 viral mRNA and C19 viral protein, to have been infected by a virus.
But there was no clear discussion by Covid Inc or its critics about the primary mechanism of action and its role in inflammatory conditions.
I pointed out that it was no mystery why Covid Inc was so mum about this because they were trying to push the notion of their products as being nothing more than “vaccines” rather than artificial equivalents of an indiscriminate viral infection in multiple organ systems.
I said that perhaps the reason Malone and others were silent about the primary mechanism of action of the viral RNA products was that they were a misuse of cell transfection reagents that were the backbone of modern molecular biology and didn’t want criticism for their misuse to be indiscriminately applied to molecular biological research.
But you said Malone was an honorable man. And now you’ve gone 180 degrees from your earlier characterization, but you still appear to have not picked up on the cell transfection reagents’ infection with viral genes as the primary cause of most of the adverse outcomes seen in those shot up with it.
Perhaps the MRNA VACCINE was needed to achieves different goal and not made to help fight COVID 19. Was there something the powers that be wanted circulating in our blood? The white clots that have killed so many? The self—assembling graphene nano structures for future downloading info to our bodies? Does anyone know?
I think so too
No, we don’t need any “vaccine” ever! They knew this was a bio weapon against humanity. They knew. Well in advance. Maloney baloney knows he worked with the US government to help create a bio weapon. He knows who he works for. He is a sociopath hiding in plain sight behind the medical freedom movement. We see who he truly is. He’s not fooling the majority of us. Enjoy your horse farm Maloney. Your ill gotten gains. What a pathetic POS!
RETIRE?!?! They should be in prison.
☠️THESE ARE NOT VACCINES; THEY ARE TRANSFECTIONS!! 🛑 calling them vaccines and playing into their grubby, chubby-handed DEATHGRIP! ☠️
Agreed! That's the appropriate approach to take in cases of scientific fraud.
Retire to the gallows, perhaps.
And where have you been? You are talking about something well-known for many years. All specific antibodies made by the adaptive immune system are humoral antibodies. They are not exported from the body for EVA work.
NO vaccine-induced specific antibodies are capable of preventing anyone from getting infected. They only work AFTER you’ve been infected. The goal is that they will help prevent a clinical case of infection from developing. They have been very effective at that.
The viral RNA products, though, actually infect indiscriminately with viral genes any cells anywhere they bump into. Viral protein vaccine do not do this. The viral RNA products cause each of those product-compromised cells to signal the innate immune system to launch innate immune inflammatory attacks to kill those cells. Viral protein vaccines do not do this.
It appears that if you’re not looking in the wrong direction then you’re drawing incomplete and/or irrelevant conclusions that only muddy the issue.
NO poison vaccines! It is absolutely frightening that they are developing vaccine (DNA mod) aerosols and patches to kill us with.
Malone and others used a standard technique of cell transfection common to all molecular biology labs in one way.
Pfizer and the others used that standard technique in another way.
What Pfizer and the others did was known from the beginning to be an unprecedented, dangerous way that infected healthy cells in multiple organ systems indiscriminately with pathogenic viral genes. The completely expected immunological outcome of this was to trigger the innate immune system to launch innate immune inflammatory attacks everywhere those cells were located to kill the cells.
This was not the intent of the en vivo therapeutic use of mRNA used by Malone, et al.
To claim that they should be punished for the other things that others did with the cell transfection techniques that existed before Malone ever got the idea of a therapeutic en vivo use of mRNA is as absurd as trying to prosecute Ford Motor Company for some get away driver’s use of a Pinto in a bank robbery. Well, actually, it’s as absurd as trying to bust a famous stock car driver for driving a model of Ford van that was later used by some jihadist Muslim asshole to run down a bunch of civilians on a city park walking path.
thanks much. then your boy should be able to answer our questions. not hide the Freedom movement and not sue everyone. I am being basic here, you know Malone did wrong...
What about Dr Joe lee he's saying similar?they can't work and are causing clotting along with many other jabs.
Please remember that many months ago I pointed out to you the weirdness of Malone and other scientists criticizing Covid Inc sharing with Covid Inc an almost complete silence about the primary mechanism of action of the viral RNA products, all of which were off-label uses of cell transfection reagents long used in molecular biology research.
I said it was weird because Malone (and others in the group meeting with Sen. Ron Johnson) had to have been intimately familiar with those reagents from their own work (including my own doctoral and post doc work), both standard mol bio lab work with in vitro stable cell lines and Malone’s work in the therapeutic use of mRNA, either to suppress defective gene products that caused disease or to supply missing gene products, the relative lack of which caused disease.
The Covid Inc use of these reagents, however, was to invade healthy cells indiscriminately in multiple organ systems and to infect them with pathogenic viral genes. The inevitable outcome of this is triggering those product-compromised cells to signal the innate immune system to launch innate immune inflammatory attacks to kill those cells because they appear, due to the presence of C19 viral mRNA and C19 viral protein, to have been infected by a virus.
But there was no clear discussion by Covid Inc or its critics about the primary mechanism of action and its role in inflammatory conditions.
I pointed out that it was no mystery why Covid Inc was so mum about this because they were trying to push the notion of their products as being nothing more than “vaccines” rather than artificial equivalents of an indiscriminate viral infection in multiple organ systems.
I said that perhaps the reason Malone and others were silent about the primary mechanism of action of the viral RNA products was that they were a misuse of cell transfection reagents that were the backbone of modern molecular biology and didn’t want criticism for their misuse to be indiscriminately applied to molecular biological research.
But you said Malone was an honorable man. And now you’ve gone 180 degrees from your earlier characterization, but you still appear to have not picked up on the cell transfection reagents’ infection with viral genes as the primary cause of most of the adverse outcomes seen in those shot up with it.