Risch asked a good question today and I am extending it here; the FDA played a misdirection fraud game on the public with Pfizer and Comirnaty and now same with spikevax and moderna...why??
Risch asked a good question today and I am extending it here; the FDA played a misdirection fraud game on the public with Pfizer and Comirnaty and now same with spikevax and moderna...why??
The FDA is a corrupted agency working for PHARMA and there is a reason for this bait and switch; there is no reason for the EUA to remain in place unless the Moderna Vaccine and Spikevax are different
I'm hoping that the case brought by the navy seals, which I believe addresses the EUA / full approval bait-and-switch, will see this addressed by a judge. The FDA is not allowed to create new legal categories like this 'approved to go in your body but not approved for liability purposes' nonsense. It is more than a blemish on them. It is a mortal blow to their credibility.
One reason has got to be for the military mandate, which they have pushed as hard and fast as they can, including boosters. DOD can only mandate FDA approved vaccines, or an EUA can be used with a Presidential waiver, like they did with anthrax but has not been done in the case of Covid. With Comirnaty not available, DOD claimed that the EUAs were “interchangeable” so they could continue to force vaccinate, but, federal court struck down that claim citing differences in licensing, formulations and ingredients. Yet they have unlawfully continued. DOD’s “official” policy on boosters is that they are not mandatory but “encouraged”. And by encouraged they mean getting an entire carrier out to sea and then bringing on boosters, telling all aboard they must get the booster if they want to leave the ship, including those that have flight ops that same day.
For those of you on that stake that do not know there is court case that was already filed about the bait and switch regarding another EUA approved drug.
I don't know for certain where to look in which law to find out how the full approval vaccine liability protection requires being on the childhood schedule as RFK, Jr. has stated; however, it is certain that the EUA special claims court is much less favorable to claimants than the normal full approval court.
Although the author of that article believes that the reason for the low claims in the EUA court is that people don't know it exists, I am inclined to believe the other differences are more significant: 1) no lawyer fees covered, 2) no pain and suffering compensation only work loss.
So why does Pfizer, Moderna or the FDA care about making sure that less claims are filed and none are paid by some government court? Reputation. The amounts paid out by the court will be a matter of public record. If many, many millions in compensation are getting paid out, even though it costs pharma nothing directly, it impairs the future market for covid vaccines on the childhood schedule and as an adult booster. Obviously, the public would have reason to be skeptical of a vaccine that is seeing such compensation amounts approved by notoriously stingy government claims courts.
They'd rather all their victims suffer with no compensation than sacrifice future profits. That is my take on this so far. That the FDA colludes in it is a crime of staggering proportions.
I'm hoping that the case brought by the navy seals, which I believe addresses the EUA / full approval bait-and-switch, will see this addressed by a judge. The FDA is not allowed to create new legal categories like this 'approved to go in your body but not approved for liability purposes' nonsense. It is more than a blemish on them. It is a mortal blow to their credibility.
One reason has got to be for the military mandate, which they have pushed as hard and fast as they can, including boosters. DOD can only mandate FDA approved vaccines, or an EUA can be used with a Presidential waiver, like they did with anthrax but has not been done in the case of Covid. With Comirnaty not available, DOD claimed that the EUAs were “interchangeable” so they could continue to force vaccinate, but, federal court struck down that claim citing differences in licensing, formulations and ingredients. Yet they have unlawfully continued. DOD’s “official” policy on boosters is that they are not mandatory but “encouraged”. And by encouraged they mean getting an entire carrier out to sea and then bringing on boosters, telling all aboard they must get the booster if they want to leave the ship, including those that have flight ops that same day.
Legal immunity. That’s why they are pushing for the babies
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60329126/childrens-health-defense-v-food-drug-administration/
For those of you on that stake that do not know there is court case that was already filed about the bait and switch regarding another EUA approved drug.
I don't know for certain where to look in which law to find out how the full approval vaccine liability protection requires being on the childhood schedule as RFK, Jr. has stated; however, it is certain that the EUA special claims court is much less favorable to claimants than the normal full approval court.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/people-dont-know-special-fund-exists-feds-pay-zero-claims-covid-19-vaccine-injuriesdeaths
Although the author of that article believes that the reason for the low claims in the EUA court is that people don't know it exists, I am inclined to believe the other differences are more significant: 1) no lawyer fees covered, 2) no pain and suffering compensation only work loss.
So why does Pfizer, Moderna or the FDA care about making sure that less claims are filed and none are paid by some government court? Reputation. The amounts paid out by the court will be a matter of public record. If many, many millions in compensation are getting paid out, even though it costs pharma nothing directly, it impairs the future market for covid vaccines on the childhood schedule and as an adult booster. Obviously, the public would have reason to be skeptical of a vaccine that is seeing such compensation amounts approved by notoriously stingy government claims courts.
They'd rather all their victims suffer with no compensation than sacrifice future profits. That is my take on this so far. That the FDA colludes in it is a crime of staggering proportions.
All the funny business with the various vaccines is quite stunning. Right out in plain sight.
Worldwide corruption
Canadian Immunization Research Network, Which Evaluates Vaccines, Is Funded By Big Pharma
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/canadian-immunization-research-network
The reason is to avoid liability for the companies. As long as they have the EUA, they can't be sued.