It is laughable that you say that your bias is not prejudice. Your prejudice is obvious. One example is your inaccurate description of the Israeli defense force response to the Hamas massacre of 1200 Israelis, which was unprovoked. It was also part of a pattern of terrorism on the part of Hamas.
It is laughable that you say that your bias is not prejudice. Your prejudice is obvious. One example is your inaccurate description of the Israeli defense force response to the Hamas massacre of 1200 Israelis, which was unprovoked. It was also part of a pattern of terrorism on the part of Hamas.
As far as genocidal motives, Hamas Explicitly states their goal of eradicating the state of Israel, I.e., what does “ from the river to the sea” mean but genocide for the Israelis. It is only the corruption and incompetence , and internecine Conflict that they have not been able to accomplish that goal. I strongly suspect that you would be OK with Hamas achieving their desired ends.
It is laughable that you say that your bias is not prejudice. Your prejudice is obvious. One example is your inaccurate description of the Israeli defense force response to the Hamas massacre of 1200 Israelis, which was unprovoked. It was also part of a pattern of terrorism on the part of Hamas.
As far as genocidal motives, Hamas Explicitly states their goal of eradicating the state of Israel, I.e., what does “ from the river to the sea” mean but genocide for the Israelis. It is only the corruption and incompetence , and internecine Conflict that they have not been able to accomplish that goal. I strongly suspect that you would be OK with Hamas achieving their desired ends.