I also dont think that the perpetrators create fake-pandemics for nothing, there is alawys a reason, and I think they rationalize if they can bring it now or if its too soon and what the consequences were if they would "bring it" now.
I also dont think that the perpetrators create fake-pandemics for nothing, there is alawys a reason, and I think they rationalize if they can bring it now or if its too soon and what the consequences were if they would "bring it" now.
This the reason that for almost 5 years banners at rallies around the globe called for Nuremberg 2. Hanging in other words. This what was done to humans is a dystopian horror.
Don't you think it would be easier to do this if the US and Canada were merged? One Nation, One People, One Leader!
Bulwark, how do you think Canada will be annexed into "Greater America"?
And do you agree with Joe Rogan that Mexico should be annexed too?
If so, what is to be done with the Mexicans?
Can they be driven out, to the south?
From the river to the sea (or "American Canal"), Greater America will be free?
But back to Canada.
Obviously, economic force alone will not be sufficient to achieve annexation.
Trying to merge, or swallow, a constitutional monarchy into a Republic would be a long and drawn out process.
Thus, I expect it will be done by military force.
What do you think will be the casus belli?
Obviously, the US can't fabricate a pretext exacly like the Gulf of Tonkin and WMDs pretexts used to launch the wars of aggression in Vietnam and Iraq.
Been there, done that.
I think it will be a border dispute.
Perhaps Poilievre will be accused of not doing enough to stem the flow of illegals and/or drugs across the border, leading to the placement of US troops along the border to provide greater security.
Next could be a border skirmish, followed by a limited or full scale invasion.
What would happen next?
Would the US push straight through to Ottawa?
The US created a plan ("War Plan Red") in the mid-1920s to invade Canada in the event of war with the UK and has invaded Canada multiple times previously, although has always been defeated, including during the War of 1812, the American Revolutionary War, and the Patriot War.
In the War of 1812 the US launched three unsuccessful invasions of Canada:
Detroit: The US army surrendered at Detroit; Queenston Heights: The US army surrendered at Queenston Heights; New York: The U.S. army withdrew after a minor skirmish north of New York.
The history of US military adventurism around the world is a long legacy of defeat, usually by third world peasants, despite superior US manpower and equipment.
Will next time be different?
Can the US with its IQ deficit, ranked only 31st in the world for mean IQ, threaten and defeat a neighbor with a smaller population but with a mean IQ in the top 10 group of countries?
Yes, it's a rather bland mixture, too much 'black n white' ... needs spicing up...
thankfully the PLAN is too bring the brown breed on board as well... \CANAMEX/... NOT your ordinary 'messy taco'...
but a 'well integrated' mega-state with delicate overtones of Chinese influence(fentanyl), basking in a bed of 'locally grown' Canuckistani (gmo)cannabis with hints of \\\middle eastern///organic organ transplant gangs in genuine 'blue corn' wrapping for those worried about their 'wheat allergies.'
Don't forgot about those 'mata gringo' cubano hot peppers that will doubtless be illicitly placed in harmonious counterpoise to the haitian wild 'long dog' slices.
I can understand that not everybody supports the idea yet but Canada is rich in natural resources. There is a lot of wealth in Canada that could be redistributed to US elites in line with thinking that dates back to the origins of the zzzRepublican Party and Lincoln's friendship with Karl Marx.
Yep, that's what it's all about. It's about natural resources, and the almighty money and power. And yes, Trump is pushing for this. Time to wake up, Dr. Paul.
I also dont think that the perpetrators create fake-pandemics for nothing, there is alawys a reason, and I think they rationalize if they can bring it now or if its too soon and what the consequences were if they would "bring it" now.
always a reason
This the reason that for almost 5 years banners at rallies around the globe called for Nuremberg 2. Hanging in other words. This what was done to humans is a dystopian horror.
Don't you think it would be easier to do this if the US and Canada were merged? One Nation, One People, One Leader!
Bulwark, how do you think Canada will be annexed into "Greater America"?
And do you agree with Joe Rogan that Mexico should be annexed too?
If so, what is to be done with the Mexicans?
Can they be driven out, to the south?
From the river to the sea (or "American Canal"), Greater America will be free?
But back to Canada.
Obviously, economic force alone will not be sufficient to achieve annexation.
Trying to merge, or swallow, a constitutional monarchy into a Republic would be a long and drawn out process.
Thus, I expect it will be done by military force.
What do you think will be the casus belli?
Obviously, the US can't fabricate a pretext exacly like the Gulf of Tonkin and WMDs pretexts used to launch the wars of aggression in Vietnam and Iraq.
Been there, done that.
I think it will be a border dispute.
Perhaps Poilievre will be accused of not doing enough to stem the flow of illegals and/or drugs across the border, leading to the placement of US troops along the border to provide greater security.
Next could be a border skirmish, followed by a limited or full scale invasion.
What would happen next?
Would the US push straight through to Ottawa?
The US created a plan ("War Plan Red") in the mid-1920s to invade Canada in the event of war with the UK and has invaded Canada multiple times previously, although has always been defeated, including during the War of 1812, the American Revolutionary War, and the Patriot War.
In the War of 1812 the US launched three unsuccessful invasions of Canada:
Detroit: The US army surrendered at Detroit; Queenston Heights: The US army surrendered at Queenston Heights; New York: The U.S. army withdrew after a minor skirmish north of New York.
The history of US military adventurism around the world is a long legacy of defeat, usually by third world peasants, despite superior US manpower and equipment.
Will next time be different?
Can the US with its IQ deficit, ranked only 31st in the world for mean IQ, threaten and defeat a neighbor with a smaller population but with a mean IQ in the top 10 group of countries?
What do you think Bulwark?
fascinating but cant happen...Canadians will not allow that. Americans dont want that. I would say this makes for good debate
Rogan said that? link?
Joe Rogan suggests US 'go right into Mexico' after taking Canada
https://katv.com/news/nation-world/joe-rogan-suggests-us-go-right-into-mexico-after-taking-canada-trump-greenland-panama-canal-trudeau-the-joe-rogan-experience
If US invade Greenland, they invade NATO, article 5 would need to be invoked...
but set that aside, the talk etc. sounds more like Xi and Taiwan or Russia Putin talking and Ukraine.
no
America and Canada should not be combined.
never be never will
Yes, it's a rather bland mixture, too much 'black n white' ... needs spicing up...
thankfully the PLAN is too bring the brown breed on board as well... \CANAMEX/... NOT your ordinary 'messy taco'...
but a 'well integrated' mega-state with delicate overtones of Chinese influence(fentanyl), basking in a bed of 'locally grown' Canuckistani (gmo)cannabis with hints of \\\middle eastern///organic organ transplant gangs in genuine 'blue corn' wrapping for those worried about their 'wheat allergies.'
Don't forgot about those 'mata gringo' cubano hot peppers that will doubtless be illicitly placed in harmonious counterpoise to the haitian wild 'long dog' slices.
hhhmmm....
I can understand that not everybody supports the idea yet but Canada is rich in natural resources. There is a lot of wealth in Canada that could be redistributed to US elites in line with thinking that dates back to the origins of the zzzRepublican Party and Lincoln's friendship with Karl Marx.
How Karl Marx Helped Shape the Republican Party
https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/12/25/how-karl-marx-helped-shape-the-republican-party/
so this is it...who has the bigger gin win? we can take whatever we want? if it benefits us? we dont care about others?
Yep, that's what it's all about. It's about natural resources, and the almighty money and power. And yes, Trump is pushing for this. Time to wake up, Dr. Paul.