Wow, there's something about that artwork that reminds me of Rushdie's "The Satanic Verses." I can imagine the outrage. The censorship lobby would not like it all.
Wow, there's something about that artwork that reminds me of Rushdie's "The Satanic Verses." I can imagine the outrage. The censorship lobby would not like it all.
I don't think it would be accepted anywhere in the West.
You know what makes me laugh now; cry actually.
Art - whether it's somehting like the Netanyahu raghead-baby-rare-prime-rib gluttony feast artwork; or a feature film like Napoleon; or a Brazilian TV series called "The mechanism", which all get slated by "critics", who say the art - that's art my brother - is not factually correct.
How can you argue with art?
How can you argue with fiction stories or feature films or even poetry?
Is this what the world is now?
Anything that's even a smidgen of left of field, or artistic creation, or licence cannot be controversial - for the sake of art - because all the nitwits need to analyse it, and run it through the mill of their dullard better than AI brains.
Don't worry about so-called "transhumanism" - it's here already.
Or should we just call it what it is - stupid, dull fucks, who have zero creativity and lemmings actually have more independent thought and individual wilfulness.
Don't worry about any of the crap the "alt media" bangs on about - it's done and dusted.
We are living in the black hole of laziness, sloth, envy and wrath.
And it's all de-facto, which is a legal term for: "it is as it is".
Well said Barry. I can picture a caricature right now of Netanyahu after pumping 4 rounds through a bathroom door while his girlfriend or a small child is inside saying "But I thought the girlfriend/child was an Hamas terrorist and therefore I used proportionate force. The killing of the child, the collateral damage, is fully justified. Anyone who says otherwise is a raghead loving Jew hater."
Wow, there's something about that artwork that reminds me of Rushdie's "The Satanic Verses." I can imagine the outrage. The censorship lobby would not like it all.
I don't think it would be accepted anywhere in the West.
You know what makes me laugh now; cry actually.
Art - whether it's somehting like the Netanyahu raghead-baby-rare-prime-rib gluttony feast artwork; or a feature film like Napoleon; or a Brazilian TV series called "The mechanism", which all get slated by "critics", who say the art - that's art my brother - is not factually correct.
How can you argue with art?
How can you argue with fiction stories or feature films or even poetry?
Is this what the world is now?
Anything that's even a smidgen of left of field, or artistic creation, or licence cannot be controversial - for the sake of art - because all the nitwits need to analyse it, and run it through the mill of their dullard better than AI brains.
Don't worry about so-called "transhumanism" - it's here already.
Or should we just call it what it is - stupid, dull fucks, who have zero creativity and lemmings actually have more independent thought and individual wilfulness.
Don't worry about any of the crap the "alt media" bangs on about - it's done and dusted.
We are living in the black hole of laziness, sloth, envy and wrath.
And it's all de-facto, which is a legal term for: "it is as it is".
CUNTS.
ALL OF THEM.
Not what I was looking for by way of riposte, but it will do: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HevM-35hJUE&pp=ygUnbW9udHkgcHl0aG9uIGhpc3Rvcnkgb2YgdGhlIG51ZGUgaW4gYXJ0
Well said Barry. I can picture a caricature right now of Netanyahu after pumping 4 rounds through a bathroom door while his girlfriend or a small child is inside saying "But I thought the girlfriend/child was an Hamas terrorist and therefore I used proportionate force. The killing of the child, the collateral damage, is fully justified. Anyone who says otherwise is a raghead loving Jew hater."