I understand that she could consent to entry and I didn't hear whether she did or not but my point was that she reported concerns about someone possibly OUTSIDE THE HOUSE. So they had no business all but inviting themselves in. Had they not done that, none of this would have happened. I could be wrong San but I believe the case law you a…
I understand that she could consent to entry and I didn't hear whether she did or not but my point was that she reported concerns about someone possibly OUTSIDE THE HOUSE. So they had no business all but inviting themselves in. Had they not done that, none of this would have happened. I could be wrong San but I believe the case law you are referring to only gives law enforcement the authority to ask for ID if the subject is suspected of committing a crime. Unless you are talking about the State Constitution of which I confess almost total ignorance. Thanks for the comment San.
I understand that she could consent to entry and I didn't hear whether she did or not but my point was that she reported concerns about someone possibly OUTSIDE THE HOUSE. So they had no business all but inviting themselves in. Had they not done that, none of this would have happened. I could be wrong San but I believe the case law you are referring to only gives law enforcement the authority to ask for ID if the subject is suspected of committing a crime. Unless you are talking about the State Constitution of which I confess almost total ignorance. Thanks for the comment San.