It is unfortunately not surprising to me that Benn notes the wider effect on improved childhood mortality from live-attenuated virus vaccines, but does not acknowledge the evidence that in well nourished unvaccinated infants and children given treatment with therapeutic doses of certain nutrients during illness, the actual infections do …
It is unfortunately not surprising to me that Benn notes the wider effect on improved childhood mortality from live-attenuated virus vaccines, but does not acknowledge the evidence that in well nourished unvaccinated infants and children given treatment with therapeutic doses of certain nutrients during illness, the actual infections do the same thing, only better, because the female children who recover from them reach reproductive maturity with the capacity to protect their newborns and toddlers from those same illnesses, while the vaccinated children never will.
It is unfortunately not surprising to me that Benn notes the wider effect on improved childhood mortality from live-attenuated virus vaccines, but does not acknowledge the evidence that in well nourished unvaccinated infants and children given treatment with therapeutic doses of certain nutrients during illness, the actual infections do the same thing, only better, because the female children who recover from them reach reproductive maturity with the capacity to protect their newborns and toddlers from those same illnesses, while the vaccinated children never will.
Right on!