The best hope is to remove the EUA for the Covid based Spike protein mRNA jabs.
I can see Trump going along with that, only because the Plandemic is over. It would not make him look bad.
However, didn't Biden extend the EUA for another 5 yrs? Hope that isn't a problem.
Of course even removing the EUA shouldn't mean that Pfizer/Moderna can't still offer the jab and even continue advertising the jab, as I'm sure they have lawyers to make their case.
What would be involved in stopped all advertising for the mRNA drug? Would Congress have to vote? How did it work with ending Tobacco advertising?
Of course if RFK Jr can't end advertising right away, he should be able to require Pfizer/Moderna stating the side effects, whether minor or not. Can you imagine the list of possible side effects? It would be longer than the add and would scare the public. I think Pfizer/Moderna would rather not advertise than to list the possible side effects.
Well can't anything be reversed? Certainly the EUA without the liability protection repeal for now.
Of course if it is found that Pfizer and/or Moderna misrepresented the data, wouldn't that invalidate the liability protection?
The DOJ could begin a liability suit, claiming false representation. That would force Pfizer and Moderna to release all records unredacted. Failure to do so could result in a temporary court ruling to suspend mRNA usage until resolved.
Could be tied up in court for a couple of years, while the repeal of the EUA is in effect.
During that time, more data of the harms of mRNA could be presented if the correct people at HHS grow some balls, besides RFK Jr.
And regarding RFK Jr's stance on advertising, can you imagine if all the major side effects have to listed. Would anyone take the semi-toxin in that case?
The best hope is to remove the EUA for the Covid based Spike protein mRNA jabs.
I can see Trump going along with that, only because the Plandemic is over. It would not make him look bad.
However, didn't Biden extend the EUA for another 5 yrs? Hope that isn't a problem.
Of course even removing the EUA shouldn't mean that Pfizer/Moderna can't still offer the jab and even continue advertising the jab, as I'm sure they have lawyers to make their case.
What would be involved in stopped all advertising for the mRNA drug? Would Congress have to vote? How did it work with ending Tobacco advertising?
Of course if RFK Jr can't end advertising right away, he should be able to require Pfizer/Moderna stating the side effects, whether minor or not. Can you imagine the list of possible side effects? It would be longer than the add and would scare the public. I think Pfizer/Moderna would rather not advertise than to list the possible side effects.
he extended PREP liability protection to 2029 that allows EUA...all connected
Well can't anything be reversed? Certainly the EUA without the liability protection repeal for now.
Of course if it is found that Pfizer and/or Moderna misrepresented the data, wouldn't that invalidate the liability protection?
The DOJ could begin a liability suit, claiming false representation. That would force Pfizer and Moderna to release all records unredacted. Failure to do so could result in a temporary court ruling to suspend mRNA usage until resolved.
Could be tied up in court for a couple of years, while the repeal of the EUA is in effect.
During that time, more data of the harms of mRNA could be presented if the correct people at HHS grow some balls, besides RFK Jr.
And regarding RFK Jr's stance on advertising, can you imagine if all the major side effects have to listed. Would anyone take the semi-toxin in that case?