62 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

“40 had increased troponinemia, in 18 causes other than the vaccine were identified that could explain the elevated troponinemia, in the other 22 (2.8%), the vaccine was defined as the cause.

‘The incidence of myocardial lesions is 2.8% or 800 times higher than the usual incidence of myocarditis.”

So they were only expecting to find 1 case at most yet they throw out 18 cases? That’s incredibly suspicious. How many males were in that population?

Expand full comment