The only explanation is that he's under NDA or something like a threat, and cannot say anything. But even then... no, I think it must be one of 2 things: a) knowing but sure it is not an issue of safety or b) knowing but being unable to say/do anything and thinking well, it will be OK even if I say nothing about it. Also, the third po…
The only explanation is that he's under NDA or something like a threat, and cannot say anything. But even then... no, I think it must be one of 2 things: a) knowing but sure it is not an issue of safety or b) knowing but being unable to say/do anything and thinking well, it will be OK even if I say nothing about it. Also, the third possibility is knowing exactly the danger and not speaking out because it was YOUR invention and YOU should have been flagging things much earlier along. And you didn't. And people died, and now you definitely don't want them coming after YOU.
Yes I recall Dr Malone mentioning an NDA binding legal restriction in his interviews and maybe even early on in his written work. At no time did I once get a hint of dissemblance confabulation or hiding anything.
The only explanation is that he's under NDA or something like a threat, and cannot say anything. But even then... no, I think it must be one of 2 things: a) knowing but sure it is not an issue of safety or b) knowing but being unable to say/do anything and thinking well, it will be OK even if I say nothing about it. Also, the third possibility is knowing exactly the danger and not speaking out because it was YOUR invention and YOU should have been flagging things much earlier along. And you didn't. And people died, and now you definitely don't want them coming after YOU.
B-I-N-G-O!
Yes I recall Dr Malone mentioning an NDA binding legal restriction in his interviews and maybe even early on in his written work. At no time did I once get a hint of dissemblance confabulation or hiding anything.