The p53 protein (GUARDIAN of the genome) is considered as a “genome guardian” by arresting (stopping) the cell cycle to repair DNA damage or causing cell death in the presence of unrepaired
The p53 protein (GUARDIAN of the genome) is considered as a “genome guardian” by arresting (stopping) the cell cycle to repair DNA damage or causing cell death in the presence of unrepaired
persistent damage and stress; p53 guardian is critical in cancer tumor suppression & research shows that the spike protein (from virus or mRNA vaccine) suppresses p53 (Zhang et al.) New research!
Isn’t it interesting that the spike is the problem but yet they create a so-called vaccine which makes your body produce this spike? Sounds like intentional actions to harm people rather than help them, of course
There is a world of difference between something you breathe in or skin contact to an injectable.
It seems more likely that those who receive multiple shots will build lots of misfolded proteins that the body cannot clear naturally.
The fact that both the virus and the jabs contain these P53 down players.. that’s too much of a coincidence because the jabs only contain the spike protein… no virus…
P 53 suppression, caused by the Covid vaccine was known at least three, maybe four years ago already, and cancers are skyrocketing exponentially, since the roll-out of the "vaccines". Why then is Bonnie Henry, of the British Columbia Health authority still insisting on vaccinations for nurses? Is she completely retarded? Or is she a cold-blooded murderer connected to the covid cartel for monetary gain? Is she one of the YGLs associated with the WEF? Is she a eugenicist? Something stinks in B.C. , and it is not salmon.
I don’t fully understand this. I get that the vaxed spike can cause cancer. But what happens to the unvaxed who have contracted Covid naturally? Are they also going to get cancer. The data doesn’t show that. So what’s the difference?
[Jamico, you may (I hope) have answered my question even before I began typing this---]
Dr. Paul, what are your thoughts on this: can spike received via shedding (as I have experienced three times a peculiar change to my health-- "novel" changes, one might say), also be implicated in this tumorigenesis? Or is spike not received via shedding?
Isn’t it interesting that the spike is the problem but yet they create a so-called vaccine which makes your body produce this spike? Sounds like intentional actions to harm people rather than help them, of course
There is a world of difference between something you breathe in or skin contact to an injectable.
It seems more likely that those who receive multiple shots will build lots of misfolded proteins that the body cannot clear naturally.
The fact that both the virus and the jabs contain these P53 down players.. that’s too much of a coincidence because the jabs only contain the spike protein… no virus…
P 53 suppression, caused by the Covid vaccine was known at least three, maybe four years ago already, and cancers are skyrocketing exponentially, since the roll-out of the "vaccines". Why then is Bonnie Henry, of the British Columbia Health authority still insisting on vaccinations for nurses? Is she completely retarded? Or is she a cold-blooded murderer connected to the covid cartel for monetary gain? Is she one of the YGLs associated with the WEF? Is she a eugenicist? Something stinks in B.C. , and it is not salmon.
I don’t fully understand this. I get that the vaxed spike can cause cancer. But what happens to the unvaxed who have contracted Covid naturally? Are they also going to get cancer. The data doesn’t show that. So what’s the difference?
Have you read anything about the jab causing cirrhosis of the liver
[Jamico, you may (I hope) have answered my question even before I began typing this---]
Dr. Paul, what are your thoughts on this: can spike received via shedding (as I have experienced three times a peculiar change to my health-- "novel" changes, one might say), also be implicated in this tumorigenesis? Or is spike not received via shedding?