Sycophant, traitor, perjurer, ex-con, disbarred attorney, and so much worse.
Yes, all those. How does a prosecutor actually think Cohen's testimony can be believed? There was no "case" here in the first place, we all know this is pure malicious prosecution and election interference.
undefined subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)
Skip for now
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.
Sycophant, traitor, perjurer, ex-con, disbarred attorney, and so much worse.
Yes, all those. How does a prosecutor actually think Cohen's testimony can be believed? There was no "case" here in the first place, we all know this is pure malicious prosecution and election interference.