Trump: "how could a plane (a 767/747) possibility go through the steel"...SAGE HANA's recent stack mirrors what I said prior that Trump said on 911, that a plane could NOT bring down the buildings
Trump: "how could a plane (a 767/747) possibility go through the steel"...SAGE HANA's recent stack mirrors what I said prior that Trump said on 911, that a plane could NOT bring down the buildings
the building were built to withstand the planes...see SAGE's stack: https://sagehana.substack.com/p/donald-trump-september-11-2001-i...substack will not allow to past the stack
That is correct. Actual eye witnesses who were in maintenance before the event complained there were strange new wires placed in the walls not by workers but by unknown persons with no specific uniforms weeks before the event.
The fact that Building 7 imploded exactly like the Twin Towers fell and in such a short amount of time shows that it was already rigged to implode upon impact. But no plane touched it. The owner was on live tv and said there were “fires” so he decided to “pull it!” How much did he know?
Now they are dissing Trump for not fully supporting the vax.
Trump’s vaccine rhetoric sends chills through public health circles
Public health advocates are watching in growing alarm as former President Trump increasingly embraces the anti-vaccine movement.
“I will not give one penny to any school that has a vaccine mandate or a mask mandate,” Trump said in a recent campaign rally in Richmond, Va.
It’s a line Trump has repeated, and his campaign said he is only referring to school COVID-19 vaccine mandates — but that hasn’t eased fears that the GOP leader could accelerate already worrying trends of declining child vaccination.
Trump “is an important voice. He has a big platform. And he uses that platform, in this case, to do harm. Because he’s implying by saying that we shouldn’t mandate vaccines, vaccines are in some ways ineffective or unsafe,” said Paul Offit, a pediatrician and vaccine expert at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.
These are facts and nobody can deny it. Trump in his own words still praises jabs, even now. What's wrong with him? Too many of zionist advisers and infuencers? If it is his tactical game to enter and win presidential elections without harm I could understand the motive. But TRUTH is better than lie and he could win even more support than he enjoys at the moment. I like Dr Shiva Ayyadurai as Independent candidate, as he tells the things and people as they are - Truth, Freedom and Health.
Praising the clot shots is where the votes are at. If denouncing them was smart Trump would already have done it. The American people love lies. Telling the truth loses votes.
Thank you. Although you have great ideas, I know many eye witnesses. Technology was not that good to cause such chaos involving so many thousands of people who were injured and died.
There were No Planes. They planted media people in the on street interviews
claiming they saw a plane. They played the clips of 'CGI' planes over and over
to convince everyone. A real airliner would have mostly crumpled up on the side of
the building, and the wings and tail section would have sheared off and fallen to the street below. It is an impossibility for a plane to completely disappear into the side of steel framed building like it was flying into a cloud.
TRUMP UNDERSTOOD CONSTRUCTION FLAWLESSLY, HE KNEW WHEN HE WAS ON STAGE WITH JEB BUSH, AS AN COMPETITOR, THAT BUSH’S BROTHER WAS COMPLICIT IN THE 9-11 ATTACK-
THE NEO-CONS COULD NOT HANDLE THAT-THEY WANTED 9-11 COVERED UP AND BURIED- WE WANT BUSH AND CHENY ON THE FUCKING GALLOWS FOR 9-11-
Maybe there has been but I have not seen it!? An open and honest debate on the buildings tumbling down and that is a big problem as people shell never get the facts and truth!?
The truth IS out there. But too many people are sheep. If the truth is uncovered, people at the top would be prosecuted. Never discount false flag events.
I was working for US Customs at the time and for months those clips played on those big screen TVs up on the wall. The media went round and round with that stuff continually . One thing that in all that tv time I didn’t see was a complete clip of #7. The only one I saw was about 10 seconds , just a glance . They claimed the building was engulphed with unchecked fuel fire all day and becoming unstable . Also that it had been severely weakened by debris from the other two. In that short clip there wasn’t much to see but it surely wasn’t burned out . The chief damage was fires on one end on a couple of floors. It seemed odd at the time but the clip wasn’t shown again when I was looking. That alone seemed odd given the others had gone around hundreds of times.
Just recently I finally saw a clear detailed clip of the street side facing the other buildings and fires. That was odd enough because you could clearly see that the lower floors even the windows were untouched more or less. Whatever damage in the vicinity was minimal at worst beyond those fires. When you watch a clear shot of how #7 suddenly came straight down in its own footprint exactly like the others there’s no other conclusion to draw. The architects were right all along it was a setup rigged most likely over months . The way they cleaned that site up in following weeks was equally suspicious. They treated it like a deliberate building site more than a crime scene.
I am a journalist, and as a journalist I ask the questions that will, hopefully, allow others to be amused, aroused, and offered the chance to ask themselves questions about life. It seems that we are now vilified for even asking ourselves if it is even possible, that what we see and hear is true, to us. This is dangerous, but certainly not revolutionary or even new, it's been the norm for what seems like countless attempts at freedom in the face of control. So, without implication, could it be that the whole situation in the world, is and has been for a long time, scripted. Could the Don, just be controlled opposition in an attempt at a greater deception? I definitely do not know, but I ask because that is, what journalists do. Your answer, yours is yours, and it belongs to you. love, Dac.
Are you referring to Pres Trump? All you have to do is look back at when he did for our country in 4 years while those demonic Dems kept trying to stop helping the USA stay safe. He wanted a secure border and was consistently sued by stupid Dems. He wanted peace and put through the Abraham Accords. He moved the to the right city following the biblical plans. He had the lowest inflation. He made us energy independent! Know your history before you attempt a feeble reply
I believe our government took those towers down. Jeffery Epstein had a painting in his NY apartment of Bush sitting on the floor holding paper airplanes and two collapsed Jenga towers on the floor in front of him. Look it up. Also, Alex Jones was aware that this was coming. He was telling people back in June(?) of 2001! He was asking people to call the WH and tell them that if planes flew into the towers & they blamed Osama bin Laden they would know it was our government! He says he knew it because he reads all government papers and documents and listens to the meetings. He says they always tell us what they’re going to do. You just have to be vigilant and keep up with everything they’re putting out.
As to the twin towers, of course a plane of that size with that momentum could knock out steel beams. Absurd to say otherwise. Thing is it didnt have to. Breaching the facade with full fuel 20k plus gallons it sprayed fuel that burned sufficiently hot to weaken beams and connections. After an hour or so the intertwined support structure gave way pancaked surpassing each floors weight rating progressively.
They didn't pancake, they turned to dust. If they pancaked, think how high the rubble piles would have been with 110 floors of debris piled up. Also, it would have taken MUCH longer than 10 seconds, which is freefall speed. If someone dropped a bowling ball off the roof it would hit the ground in about 10 seconds. If it pancaked, each floor would have met resistance and had to overcome the next. It was dustified. See Dr. Judy Wood's book 'Where Did The Towers Go?"
There were only scattered fires on a few floors, FEMA and NIST determined that jet fuel was not a proximate cause of the collapse, only serving to ignite office furnishings. An open-air fire, even with jet fuel, would never reach a high enough temperature compromise a 2" thick structural steel column. Especially after only an hour of burn time. The 'pancaking' theory was abandoned by NIST, because it is impossible.
Did a brief check just now using smart phone while at work Not a deep dive. NIST did not say the fuel was not a proximate cause. By the wiki summary I read, in my words, NIST concluded the fuel and office furnishings fire weakened beams whose fire resistance was compromised by impact. The metal bent inward and floors collapsed downward . I presume the accumulating momentum exceeding design strengths. The NIST said bldg 7 collapse was caused by uncontrolled fire I presume started
and aggravated by the towers. If you have a citation from NIST saying fuel not a proximate cause and where they abandon pancake theory or species of it do set it forth.
Beams are insulated in order to provide fire resistance and protect their integrity. Lose the insulation at points of fire and that heat can breach the integrity provided at those points.
NIST is completely fraudulent. Their investigation is a complete whitewash.
It can be seen from photographs and videos from the day, that there were intact perimeter columns where an aircraft wing was supposed to have passed through.
They have no evidence that any core columns were compromised, or that fireproofing was removed. That is purely speculative. It is also a moot point. You could subject one of the massive 47 core columns to intense heat for hours without significantly weakening them.
Only a handful of the core columns on a few floors would have been exposed to any fires.
All of the hundreds of perimeter columns and core columns on the floors beneath the 'impact zones' were structurally intact. A global collapse at near free fall acceleration through the path of greatest resistance is impossible. Every floor of the buildings were engineered and constructed to hold up everything above them, with a 3x safety margin, and it had done so since the towers were erected. They were not a house of cards.
You opened this writing: "There were only scattered fires on a few floors, FEMA and NIST determined that jet fuel was not a proximate cause of the collapse, only serving to ignite office furnishings. An open-air fire, even with jet fuel," You wrote as if NIST was accurate in saying "jet fuel was not a proximate cause of the collapse," It apparently didn't say that so now having invoked it you are now saying it issued a whitewash. You stated "there were only scattered fires on a few floors". I would not dismiss 20,000 plus gallons of fuel along with the other combustibles of the plane and building "scattered fires" They were key to compromising a structure whose fire suppression and retardation systems were compromised or inoperative. I suspect no one lived on those floors to make such a contention. Steel is insulated for a reason. It is weekend by intense heat loosing its rigidity. The structural integrity of the building was compromised by impact and fire as insulation was degraded by the impact as well. I presume some beams were actually sheered by impact. If four floors are so degraded they cannot support what is above them. Those floors above because they have inadequate lattice support especially lateral conceivably buckled collapsing downward with increasing cascading momentum damaging the integrity of lower floors then overwhelming any safety factor. https://www.civil.utah.edu/2023/09/11/collapse-sequence-of-the-twin-towers/
'The populist view suggests that the steel melted. He explained, based on the available evidence, that the fireballs from the jet fuel while dramatic were not explosive (which would have taken microseconds instead of the 2 seconds observed on tape) and did not cause significant structural damage, that the jet fuel had mostly been consumed within 5 minutes of the initial ignition of the vaporized fuel. Instead, the primary heat-related effects were from simultaneous fires on multiple floors, floors that had experienced a total loss of or compromised fire retardant and suppression systems.'
The fire suppression systems in the twin towers were not suppressed. Fire crews were able to ascend one of the buildings to the 80th floor. Their recorded dispatches to their commanders below was that fires were not significant and they could easily be managed with two hose lines.
Again, no loss of 'fire retardant' can be proven. They did physical testing firing shot gun blasts at test panels with fire protective coatings, and were unable to dislodge the coating.
You are welcome to believe as you wish. But the laws of physics are immutable.
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. This means that even if the floors
that were impacted by the alleged aircraft collision had been instantaneously vaporized by
a nuclear device, the falling upper block of stories could not crush down and demolish the 80 or more stories below. The building's construction was progressively more robust towards its base. If any global collapse had been initiated, it would be arrested after a few floors. There is not enough energy available to demolish floors into dust and fall at near free fall in a gravitational collapse.
Paul. Thanks 4 sharing but this is very old Trump news. He bowed down to Satan long ago and was hired to achieve Satan's demonic plan. Hopefully some of his cult will leave
No way. You need to learn your history. The Hamas rebels want to kill all Jews. The Israelis just want to live in peace on their small Democratic country finally recognized in 1948.
The physics and science prove that the "official" 9/11 narrative is impossible. WTC 7 alone proves the narrative false.
Overwhelming proof 9/11 was a false flag operation.
https://open.substack.com/pub/keihatsu/p/the-official-account-of-911-is-impossible?r=2kx8r6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
That is correct. Actual eye witnesses who were in maintenance before the event complained there were strange new wires placed in the walls not by workers but by unknown persons with no specific uniforms weeks before the event.
yes
I remember meeting the granddaughter of the architects who designed the twin towers. The 911 commission report is pure bunk.
The fact that Building 7 imploded exactly like the Twin Towers fell and in such a short amount of time shows that it was already rigged to implode upon impact. But no plane touched it. The owner was on live tv and said there were “fires” so he decided to “pull it!” How much did he know?
Pres Trump is NOT the “father of the vaccines.” Adjust your facts. Dr Fauci was in the White House and it was he who advocated the vaccine.
Trump says HE IS THE FATHER OF OPERATION WARP SPEED. TRUMP GAVE FAUCI AN AWARD FOR HIS GENOCIDE ASSISTANCE
Now they are dissing Trump for not fully supporting the vax.
Trump’s vaccine rhetoric sends chills through public health circles
Public health advocates are watching in growing alarm as former President Trump increasingly embraces the anti-vaccine movement.
“I will not give one penny to any school that has a vaccine mandate or a mask mandate,” Trump said in a recent campaign rally in Richmond, Va.
It’s a line Trump has repeated, and his campaign said he is only referring to school COVID-19 vaccine mandates — but that hasn’t eased fears that the GOP leader could accelerate already worrying trends of declining child vaccination.
Trump “is an important voice. He has a big platform. And he uses that platform, in this case, to do harm. Because he’s implying by saying that we shouldn’t mandate vaccines, vaccines are in some ways ineffective or unsafe,” said Paul Offit, a pediatrician and vaccine expert at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.
http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4517350-trump-vaccine-rhetoric-public-health/?utm_campaign=KHN%3A%20First%20Edition&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=297655112&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8jRspgrY1p3-4JTxXdrOMn4drHBEYPrMO_GLGr5gXdJPmAMJ3f1vZW2JHPqqeBW_jnoq6uKknPurHNX_Yh9yWpYMI3ng&utm_content=297655112&utm_source=hs_email
These are facts and nobody can deny it. Trump in his own words still praises jabs, even now. What's wrong with him? Too many of zionist advisers and infuencers? If it is his tactical game to enter and win presidential elections without harm I could understand the motive. But TRUTH is better than lie and he could win even more support than he enjoys at the moment. I like Dr Shiva Ayyadurai as Independent candidate, as he tells the things and people as they are - Truth, Freedom and Health.
Praising the clot shots is where the votes are at. If denouncing them was smart Trump would already have done it. The American people love lies. Telling the truth loses votes.
Trump cult reject facts. Delusions keep them in the MAGA CULT
I luv dr Dhiva but they will murder him before they allow him access to govt
Great information. See architects and engineers for 9/11 Truth. They have all the evidence you’re seeking.
Here’s another angle: there was no plane and what we saw was deep fake technology: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/how-to-tell-whats-real-in-the-land
Thank you. Although you have great ideas, I know many eye witnesses. Technology was not that good to cause such chaos involving so many thousands of people who were injured and died.
There were No Planes. They planted media people in the on street interviews
claiming they saw a plane. They played the clips of 'CGI' planes over and over
to convince everyone. A real airliner would have mostly crumpled up on the side of
the building, and the wings and tail section would have sheared off and fallen to the street below. It is an impossibility for a plane to completely disappear into the side of steel framed building like it was flying into a cloud.
TRUMP UNDERSTOOD CONSTRUCTION FLAWLESSLY, HE KNEW WHEN HE WAS ON STAGE WITH JEB BUSH, AS AN COMPETITOR, THAT BUSH’S BROTHER WAS COMPLICIT IN THE 9-11 ATTACK-
THE NEO-CONS COULD NOT HANDLE THAT-THEY WANTED 9-11 COVERED UP AND BURIED- WE WANT BUSH AND CHENY ON THE FUCKING GALLOWS FOR 9-11-
Larry Silverstein, the leaseholder of WTC 7 is on video stating that WTC 7 was “pulled.”
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=j2q2mD2HaKA
Thank you for finding.
Maybe there has been but I have not seen it!? An open and honest debate on the buildings tumbling down and that is a big problem as people shell never get the facts and truth!?
The truth IS out there. But too many people are sheep. If the truth is uncovered, people at the top would be prosecuted. Never discount false flag events.
SPOT ON and so many been bought!
Yes it didn’t add up - buying Where Did The Towers Go from Judy Wood.
I was working for US Customs at the time and for months those clips played on those big screen TVs up on the wall. The media went round and round with that stuff continually . One thing that in all that tv time I didn’t see was a complete clip of #7. The only one I saw was about 10 seconds , just a glance . They claimed the building was engulphed with unchecked fuel fire all day and becoming unstable . Also that it had been severely weakened by debris from the other two. In that short clip there wasn’t much to see but it surely wasn’t burned out . The chief damage was fires on one end on a couple of floors. It seemed odd at the time but the clip wasn’t shown again when I was looking. That alone seemed odd given the others had gone around hundreds of times.
Just recently I finally saw a clear detailed clip of the street side facing the other buildings and fires. That was odd enough because you could clearly see that the lower floors even the windows were untouched more or less. Whatever damage in the vicinity was minimal at worst beyond those fires. When you watch a clear shot of how #7 suddenly came straight down in its own footprint exactly like the others there’s no other conclusion to draw. The architects were right all along it was a setup rigged most likely over months . The way they cleaned that site up in following weeks was equally suspicious. They treated it like a deliberate building site more than a crime scene.
I am a journalist, and as a journalist I ask the questions that will, hopefully, allow others to be amused, aroused, and offered the chance to ask themselves questions about life. It seems that we are now vilified for even asking ourselves if it is even possible, that what we see and hear is true, to us. This is dangerous, but certainly not revolutionary or even new, it's been the norm for what seems like countless attempts at freedom in the face of control. So, without implication, could it be that the whole situation in the world, is and has been for a long time, scripted. Could the Don, just be controlled opposition in an attempt at a greater deception? I definitely do not know, but I ask because that is, what journalists do. Your answer, yours is yours, and it belongs to you. love, Dac.
Are you referring to Pres Trump? All you have to do is look back at when he did for our country in 4 years while those demonic Dems kept trying to stop helping the USA stay safe. He wanted a secure border and was consistently sued by stupid Dems. He wanted peace and put through the Abraham Accords. He moved the to the right city following the biblical plans. He had the lowest inflation. He made us energy independent! Know your history before you attempt a feeble reply
9/11
Ask Ryan Dawson.
He'll tell you.
https://www.ancreport.com/replying-to-911-kooks/
I believe our government took those towers down. Jeffery Epstein had a painting in his NY apartment of Bush sitting on the floor holding paper airplanes and two collapsed Jenga towers on the floor in front of him. Look it up. Also, Alex Jones was aware that this was coming. He was telling people back in June(?) of 2001! He was asking people to call the WH and tell them that if planes flew into the towers & they blamed Osama bin Laden they would know it was our government! He says he knew it because he reads all government papers and documents and listens to the meetings. He says they always tell us what they’re going to do. You just have to be vigilant and keep up with everything they’re putting out.
As to the twin towers, of course a plane of that size with that momentum could knock out steel beams. Absurd to say otherwise. Thing is it didnt have to. Breaching the facade with full fuel 20k plus gallons it sprayed fuel that burned sufficiently hot to weaken beams and connections. After an hour or so the intertwined support structure gave way pancaked surpassing each floors weight rating progressively.
Then how do you explain building 7 imploding exactly the same way when no plane hit it?
They didn't pancake, they turned to dust. If they pancaked, think how high the rubble piles would have been with 110 floors of debris piled up. Also, it would have taken MUCH longer than 10 seconds, which is freefall speed. If someone dropped a bowling ball off the roof it would hit the ground in about 10 seconds. If it pancaked, each floor would have met resistance and had to overcome the next. It was dustified. See Dr. Judy Wood's book 'Where Did The Towers Go?"
There were only scattered fires on a few floors, FEMA and NIST determined that jet fuel was not a proximate cause of the collapse, only serving to ignite office furnishings. An open-air fire, even with jet fuel, would never reach a high enough temperature compromise a 2" thick structural steel column. Especially after only an hour of burn time. The 'pancaking' theory was abandoned by NIST, because it is impossible.
Did a brief check just now using smart phone while at work Not a deep dive. NIST did not say the fuel was not a proximate cause. By the wiki summary I read, in my words, NIST concluded the fuel and office furnishings fire weakened beams whose fire resistance was compromised by impact. The metal bent inward and floors collapsed downward . I presume the accumulating momentum exceeding design strengths. The NIST said bldg 7 collapse was caused by uncontrolled fire I presume started
and aggravated by the towers. If you have a citation from NIST saying fuel not a proximate cause and where they abandon pancake theory or species of it do set it forth.
Beams are insulated in order to provide fire resistance and protect their integrity. Lose the insulation at points of fire and that heat can breach the integrity provided at those points.
NIST is completely fraudulent. Their investigation is a complete whitewash.
It can be seen from photographs and videos from the day, that there were intact perimeter columns where an aircraft wing was supposed to have passed through.
They have no evidence that any core columns were compromised, or that fireproofing was removed. That is purely speculative. It is also a moot point. You could subject one of the massive 47 core columns to intense heat for hours without significantly weakening them.
Only a handful of the core columns on a few floors would have been exposed to any fires.
All of the hundreds of perimeter columns and core columns on the floors beneath the 'impact zones' were structurally intact. A global collapse at near free fall acceleration through the path of greatest resistance is impossible. Every floor of the buildings were engineered and constructed to hold up everything above them, with a 3x safety margin, and it had done so since the towers were erected. They were not a house of cards.
You opened this writing: "There were only scattered fires on a few floors, FEMA and NIST determined that jet fuel was not a proximate cause of the collapse, only serving to ignite office furnishings. An open-air fire, even with jet fuel," You wrote as if NIST was accurate in saying "jet fuel was not a proximate cause of the collapse," It apparently didn't say that so now having invoked it you are now saying it issued a whitewash. You stated "there were only scattered fires on a few floors". I would not dismiss 20,000 plus gallons of fuel along with the other combustibles of the plane and building "scattered fires" They were key to compromising a structure whose fire suppression and retardation systems were compromised or inoperative. I suspect no one lived on those floors to make such a contention. Steel is insulated for a reason. It is weekend by intense heat loosing its rigidity. The structural integrity of the building was compromised by impact and fire as insulation was degraded by the impact as well. I presume some beams were actually sheered by impact. If four floors are so degraded they cannot support what is above them. Those floors above because they have inadequate lattice support especially lateral conceivably buckled collapsing downward with increasing cascading momentum damaging the integrity of lower floors then overwhelming any safety factor. https://www.civil.utah.edu/2023/09/11/collapse-sequence-of-the-twin-towers/
From your linked article.
'The populist view suggests that the steel melted. He explained, based on the available evidence, that the fireballs from the jet fuel while dramatic were not explosive (which would have taken microseconds instead of the 2 seconds observed on tape) and did not cause significant structural damage, that the jet fuel had mostly been consumed within 5 minutes of the initial ignition of the vaporized fuel. Instead, the primary heat-related effects were from simultaneous fires on multiple floors, floors that had experienced a total loss of or compromised fire retardant and suppression systems.'
The fire suppression systems in the twin towers were not suppressed. Fire crews were able to ascend one of the buildings to the 80th floor. Their recorded dispatches to their commanders below was that fires were not significant and they could easily be managed with two hose lines.
Again, no loss of 'fire retardant' can be proven. They did physical testing firing shot gun blasts at test panels with fire protective coatings, and were unable to dislodge the coating.
https://dai.ly/x1e3q8
You are welcome to believe as you wish. But the laws of physics are immutable.
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. This means that even if the floors
that were impacted by the alleged aircraft collision had been instantaneously vaporized by
a nuclear device, the falling upper block of stories could not crush down and demolish the 80 or more stories below. The building's construction was progressively more robust towards its base. If any global collapse had been initiated, it would be arrested after a few floors. There is not enough energy available to demolish floors into dust and fall at near free fall in a gravitational collapse.
Trump claimed he was the "father of the vaccine" and the "King of ventilators" - but he also ridiculed Fauci & Birx often... it's complicated :/
https://eccentrik.substack.com/p/will-trump-ever-admit-the-vaccine?r=8ypo0&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true
Paul. Thanks 4 sharing but this is very old Trump news. He bowed down to Satan long ago and was hired to achieve Satan's demonic plan. Hopefully some of his cult will leave
Stop with the Satan talk. Satan is busy helping Hamas and Putin.
Satan is busy helping zTrump and Netanyahu planning their next Palestinian genocide
They both genocide their people. Now together they will. FINISH THE JOB..VERBATIUM BY DJT
No way. You need to learn your history. The Hamas rebels want to kill all Jews. The Israelis just want to live in peace on their small Democratic country finally recognized in 1948.
Um, speaking of history. It was Israel's Mossad and Zionists throughout the
US Government that perpetrated 9/11. Israel also created and funded Hamas
as a way to oust the PLO.