9 Comments

I looked in freeze frame at as much exposed roof as i could especially to the right side of dead shooter. If these guys were up there first where is the brass? I see no spent cartridges. I see no evidence circles, flags, cards, or other markers showing where such evidence might have been logged and removed from. How could they have policed it that fast anyhow? Why would it have been removed so quickly? Isn't that the work of the forensic people? How would they have arrived in advance of this video from the first to respond? Again I've seen no mention of any brass in any number anywhere in media yet. Did they ask the Pa. cop bosses in the hearing today? Haven't seen that in the news either.

What I see though and it's pretty clear if you stop the video at around 45 second mark there's a decent view of his right leg. Enlarge and look in at the knee. It absolutely appears to have an entrance and exit wound that starts on the lower outside of the knee (entrance wound) and ends above the knee (exit wound/ larger) there is very little blood visible except in the exit wound. Could that be a shot that hit him after death? Also if that shot came from a shooter/sniper above him it would have been at a way different angle. It clearly appears to have come up the rake/slant of the roof. Like it came from someone looking up the roof perhaps he was standing at the bottom of the roof and the shot slightly above parallel to the roof slope. I've tried to post a screenshot but it won't allow me. If I'm correct there was someone shooting at him close to the kill shot from behind him. Shot seems at too shallow an angle to have been from the water tower but could have come from a distance from a shooter on the ground or an elevated shot lower then the water tower. It almost looks like it came from a 9mm pistol and lots of police types that's standard side arm. Go look I'm sure you'll agree it's a gunshot wound.

Expand full comment

Where's the proof Crooks operated the drone? This is America, a communist police state, notsome democratic country. The powers that be could just be making this shit up. And why are there no good recent photos of Crooks being shown? Why do the fake news keep showing pictures of him that look like they were taken when he was 13? Was he ever on puberty blockers? Was he transitioning? Why did he, if the fake news can be believed, have a photo of Fanni Willis on his phone?

Expand full comment

Very valid questions👍

Expand full comment

If he was identified as person of interest before rally, why was Trump not privy to what was going on, when threat perceptions were clear before rally and that is what I am reading, why again was Trump allowed to take stage! Was didn’t SECRET SERVICE ISOLATE INDIVIDUAL, INVESTIGATE, WHEN THE WORD “ GUN” was screamed, everything should have STOPPED and been investigated!

Expand full comment

Were they able to retrieve the 8 bullets?

Expand full comment

There’s too many security actions and checks “missing” for this to be a series of “mistakes” or coincidences. Looks to me that this was an effort coordinated by and with federal government entities. We need to uncover WHO was involved in the operational gaps. Why else would Crooks create a video before the shooting where he is saying, “You got the wrong guy”?

Expand full comment

If you have one gun in a fixed location recorded on a mic at another fixed location followed by the single shot of the rifle that capped the shooter from a third location 400 yards away, then you can’t have at least two different gun sounds from a single gun before the final shot.

Expand full comment

Thanks for using Sheryl Attkisson info. She’s even better since she went independent. Real reporting.

Second shooter & a fbi or other 3 letter agency groomer in there somewhere

Expand full comment

At some point he had someone in his ear telling him about all the chicks that would be doing the deed with him for the first time for such an "honorable act."

Expand full comment