74 Comments

Kamala's mother was born in India and her father was born in Jamaica, she was an anchor baby, that is why she is legally disqualified...one parent has to have been born in the US...she grew up in Canada before they returned to the US...

Expand full comment
author

disqualified by her failures....but you bring up a key point...she was born in US soil that makes her eligible to be POTUS....yet the issue you raise is anchor...I read the rules and does not mention that...has not been tested in court...but interesting. maybe you are right

Expand full comment
Jul 25·edited Jul 25

this is in addition to the fact that "Biden" was not legally elected President because Trump actually won in 2020 as we know..."Biden's" inauguration according to some was actually his funeral...the real one was dealt with at GITMO several yrs ago...in the early spring of 2020 he disappeared for about 2 weeks, and when he reappeared he looked different...from that time on, actors and/or clones have been "Biden". Kamala may also be an actor in a mask or a clone. Hunter is also not the same person. But if we are pretending that Biden and Harris are real and legally elected Pres and VP, then her being Constitutionally ineligible to hold either office is even more important. And since everyone is "giving" her their delegates without her having earned them, that makes the idea of a Convention choosing their candidate moot and feels like a coup.

Expand full comment

my understanding of the Constitution is you have to born in the USA and one parent does as well...within the British Empire, anyone can emigrate to another Commonwealth country and become Prime Minister, in Canada for example...this US law prevents usurpers from abroad coming in and taking over the USA. Her father wanted to be a professor at a US college or university, but he was fired because of his extreme Marxist views...

Expand full comment

Exactly!

Expand full comment
author

hhhhm

Expand full comment

Let’s see here. Biden and Kamala were usurpers. The Constitution does not spell out citizenship requirements for usurpers. So she must be OK.

Expand full comment
author

ha

Expand full comment

It doesn’t say what “the militia” is either.

That is why originalism is important.

See the Minor v Happersett decision. The understanding of what constitutes natural born citizenship and naturalized citizenship was common knowledge when the Constitution was written. The Minor v Happersett decision clearly reviews all that in great detail.

It also makes very clear what natural born does not mean. It does NOT mean “born withIn US territory.”

Children born to ambassadors while here in America, were not natural born US citizens because

A. their parents were not US citizens,

B. their parents owed allegiance to another country, and

C. citizenship of the minor child follows that of the custodial parent.

This is why children born to members of American Indian tribes that were still sovereign nations and had not been granted citizenship were not natural born citizens. When a tribe was granted citizenship by way of treaty, all the members became naturalized US citizens, as well as their children by virtue of C above. None was eligible to be president. The children born later, after their parents had become naturalized citizens, were natural born citizens by virtue of A above.

This is why children of refugees who come here and get naturalized automatically become naturalized US citizens when their custodial parents do by virtue of A and C above.

This is why any child born anywhere in the world to a U.S. citizen parent (whether natural born or naturalized) is a natural born US citizen.

Remember how hard the Left tried to confuse matters about the circumstances of John McCain’s birth? That was yet another deliberate attempt by them to dumb down understanding of what constitutes US citizenship. The Left as far back as the time of the Minor v Happersett case was doing this.

The majority opinion in that case shot all of that down and defined in a legally-binding matter what US citizenship is and is not.

No child born to non-citizen parents is a natural born citizen of the US by accident of birth in a location inside of US territory.

Any child born to US citizens (whether natural born or naturalized) is a natural born US citizen regardless of location of birth and by virtue of his parents’ citizenship.

All children of non-US citizens who naturalize become naturalized at the time of their parents’ naturalization.

No naturalized citizen can be elected President.

Any child born to a naturalized US citizen anywhere in the world can be elected President.

Any non-US citizen child adopted by a US citizen automatically becomes a naturalized US citizen, but cannot be elected President.

If you give up your US citizenship, whether natural born or naturalized, by becoming a naturalized citizen of another country, the citizenship of your minor children of which you have custody automatically changes with your change of citizenship and they can no longer be elected President.

If you later regained your US citizenship, it is as a naturalized US citizen and your minor children within your custodial care also become naturalized US citizens but are ineligible to be elected President.

So, with that:

1. Kamala Harris. She was born to parents who were not US citizens at time of her birth and had the citizenship of her custodial parents. When they became naturalized US citizens, she automatically became a naturalized US citizen and is ineligible to be elected President. Her children, though, are eligible to be elected President.

2. Barry Obama. His mother, as his custodial parent, moved with him to Indonesia and became a naturalized Indonesian citizen in order to marry Lolo Soetoro because, at the time, Indonesian citizens could neither marry nor adopt foreigners. Once she naturalized, she became an Indonesian citizen and Barry automatically became one, too, because the citizenship of a minor child follows that of his custodial parent, and was then legally adopted by Lolo Soetoro after he married Barry’s mother. When Barry’s sister was born, she was a natural born Indonesian citizen.

When Barry’s mother sent him back to Hawaii to live with his grandparents, it was as a naturalized Indonesian citizen, and ineligible to be elected President.

If his grandparents (or anyone else for that matter) had adopted him, he would have become a naturalized US citizen, but ineligible to be elected President. Neither they nor any other US citizen adopted him.

If his mother had moved back to the US and had regained custody of him and had, while he was still her minor child, regained her citizenship by naturalization, then he would have automatically regained his US citizenship, but as a naturalized citizen and ineligible to be elected President. She did not do this.

As a minor child Barry, on his own, could not become a naturalized US citizen.

If he, as an adult, became a naturalized US citizen, he could not be lawfully elected President. We have no idea whether he ever went through the naturalization process. We do know, though, that as a naturalized Indonesian citizen or a naturalized US citizen, he was ineligible to be elected President.

Expand full comment
author

very very good analysis...I think the challenge is the founding fathers etc. did not anticipate this anchor baby shit

Expand full comment

Thanks, by the time Minor v Happersett was decided, there were already people claiming that birthplace conferred citizenship. The Chief Justice shot that down.

Those who believe that now are merely victims of the descendants of those folks back then, who also distinguished themselves by their antagonism against even the concept of a Constitution.

Expand full comment

Thanks for your helpful analysis!

Expand full comment

I thought you would like her. She is a staunch Zionist and married to a Jewish Zionist. She puts Israel first.

Expand full comment
author

I love her, I love everyone...I love you...as a brother...a human being, likely a good heart, good person...I despise her politics and hatred of USA and efforts to destroy it...so to be VPOTUS or POTUS no, and as daddy T would say, not even as dog catcher

Expand full comment
author

so I cannot hate someone as a person even if I disagree with your politics...I just do not want her in power any further for already she has harmed USA with rapes and murders...she is anti police and I love the blue

Expand full comment

And, you apparently love giving billions of our tax dollars to Israel every year too. Right?

Expand full comment

Who it is married to and what it thinks does not mean it is at all effectively beneficial to the best interests of the USA. It is an enemy of the people and a total washout as are most fake leaders of nations elected by blind bats with no regard for anything but the goal of wholesale destruction of once solid nations.

Expand full comment
author

thats the issue

Expand full comment

You refer to Kamala as “it.” Hmmm. OK!

Expand full comment

Camelthing is an abomination.

Expand full comment

I agree that being a staunch Zionist, like Dr. Alexander, Kamala and her husband, who all support giving billions of US taxpayer dollars to Israel every year is not in the best interest of the USA.

Expand full comment
author

you got it wrong...you must read my writing properly. you dont.

Expand full comment

I don't hear you complaining about all the $$$ to corrupt Ukraine.

Expand full comment

I complain about all the $$$ the US sends to corrupt Ukraine all the time. I am consistent in my desire for our tax dollars to be spent in America, and not be wasted on sending weapons to blow up people in other countries. However, people like Dr. Alexander, Genocide Joe, and Kamala seem to make an exception for Israel.

Expand full comment
author

you seem Mike to have a fetish with me...why? is it my cuteness? my accent? its ok...I get it all the time. please read my work before saying these things but again, its USA, and you are free to say what you want.

Expand full comment

LOL, nope just disappointed that you've apparently been brainwashed by Israeli propaganda into supporting giving billions of our tax dollars to Israel every year, and then you use your platform push for that. It's sad really.

Expand full comment

We have no money left.

Expand full comment

Thanks to Biden and his New World Order push. Israel fights the New World Order and we must ally with like thinker and believers. Ukraine is corrupt and many of the Ukrainian people are Russian.

Expand full comment

But people like Dr. Alexander will insist that we have a few extra billion to send to Israel.

Expand full comment

So it is your conjecture that what is in the best interest of the US is to support Hamas whiping out Israel “from the River, to the Sea?” Israel was attacked by Hamas terrorists and Harris is suggesting that there should be an embargo against sending arms to Israel. You and Harris’ support of Hamas would cause the destruction of Israel, but I think you want that and stop short of saying so.

Expand full comment

It would be best for the US to stop sending billions of dollars in weapons to Israel and stop sending billions of dollars in weapons to the Ukraine. Pretending that spending our tax dollars in America is supporting Hamas or supporting Russia is dumb talking point.

Expand full comment
author

but Michael, we say that...you just so emotional you do not read in full...please do. and of course c Anderson does not want our money being given away. but c is right about something, Israel was attacked by Hamas terrorists

Expand full comment

Please let me know exactly how many billions of US tax dollars you think we should send to Israel. They are a wealthy country and can take care of themselves, and we are broke.

Expand full comment

What is or is not in the best interests of anything is the excuse most will use to deflect from their duties to defend what is right. For example, were I walking in a back alley and saw a girl being attacked by a rapist, it would not be in my best interests to intervene due to the distinct possibility of being injured or worse. The primary concern here would have to be in the best interests of the victim being attacked. Thus the only proper route and action would be to defend the girl. Scriptures validate my perspectives. "He who knoweth to do good and doeth it not, to him it is sin." The message is clear, the penalty is clear, the proper thing to do is clear.

Expand full comment
author

great sharing

Expand full comment

Of the roughly 1,200 people killed on Oct 7th, several hundred were killed by Israel through the Hannibal directive. Since that time Israel has killed tens of thousands of innocent people in Gaza, primarily with weapons given to them by the US. Pretending that Israel is like a rape victim is a dumb. https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2024-07-07/ty-article-magazine/.premium/idf-ordered-hannibal-directive-on-october-7-to-prevent-hamas-taking-soldiers-captive/00000190-89a2-d776-a3b1-fdbe45520000

Expand full comment
author

lots today we read is not true and do you trust the media? you trust US media? same all over the world

Expand full comment

You are the one who apparently believes the obviously fake stories about shattered pelvises and beheaded babies., and then use those fake stories as support for sending more of our tax dollars to Israel.

Expand full comment

A staunch Zionist would have been present to hear Netanyahu today, instead of speaking at a sorority conference to do some girl bonding. Wouldn’t you think a presidential candidate who is concerned about war in the Middle East would choose the more relevant meeting? Harris is a 40 watt bulb.

Expand full comment
author

Harris doomed her election by not attending...not for Bibi, but showed that as a lefty deranged democrat, she would not understand her 'duty' as VPOTUS

Expand full comment

More like a low wattage bulb that you put into a night light.

Expand full comment

You are too kind. She was already burned out spreading her gangly legs for willie the wonker. Zeke would not piss on the best part of this lying puke.

Expand full comment
author

hhhmm

Expand full comment

She really wanted to be there, but had other plans. Don't worry, she had a meeting with Netanyahu shortly afterwards. https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/netanyahu-meet-harris-biden-important-moment-us-israel-112257308

Expand full comment

All is never as it meets the eye.

Expand full comment

Hehehe. Ya right. The fact is that 80 other progressives along with Harris will meet with him tomorrow to lambast Netanyahu as an enemy to their beloved Hamas terrorists. https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/23/politics/house-progressives-counter-programming-netanyahu/index.html

Expand full comment

Funny. The meeting Harris and Biden are having with Netanyahu is to discuss how many billions of our tax dollars Israel is going to get in our next handout. I can assure you that Harris and her Jewish husband are not Hamas supporters, and if anything will support giving Israel even more of our tax dollars than Biden.

Expand full comment

And how many pallets of cash will be secretly flown to Iran for Hamas? Biden plays the game to win no matter which way the war goes. You missed looking at the long game which is the New World Order.

Expand full comment
Jul 25·edited Jul 25

That’s what I love about Jew hating trolls.

Their sick irrational hatred makes them spew cognitively dissonant BS for all to see.

I guess because she’s a “Zionist”, that’s why she boycotted Bibi’s speech??🙄

And I guess that’s why she’s pro-Hamas??🤔

Oh, and there’s this.

http://www.danielgreenfield.org/2024/07/iran-is-funding-pro-hamas-protests.html

Crawl back under your rock.

Expand full comment

I'm Jewish on my fathers side. There are many Jews who don't support Zionism. Pretending that they are Jew-haters is dumb. Harris is married to Jew, and met with Netanyahu shortly after his address to discuss how many more billions of our tax dollars he is going to get on our next handout to Israel. https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/netanyahu-meet-harris-biden-important-moment-us-israel-112257308

Expand full comment

She is stupid...and will never get respect from world leaders.

Expand full comment

Her Marxist background and ties to China should be reason #3

Expand full comment

I think wanting to destroy your own country whilst enriching your globalist masters via the destruction of small businesses and helping usher in Orwellian control are required attributes for global leadership roles these days.

Expand full comment

Trump asked me to post this. I'm doing it because We Need to Take America Back.

I just donated to President Trump and I want you to join me. Click below to chip in $5 and to Make America Great Again! https://secure.winred.com/trump-national-committee-jfc/lp-website-external-twitter

Expand full comment

Kaggels parents born in foreign countries, citizenship? Strange how the birth record keeper in Hawaii died in accident a few years back and can no longer attest to the truth of the record, coinvent. As being border czar an ultimate failure never stopping crime via drugs, human trafficking, people from other countries most cold possibly serial killers and not fit into country. Great job cakkels! How many single men crossed the border, children and babies without an adult, adults corrupted by cartels. They cannot even begin to figure out how many people to do harm. Get out there and vote in volumes get rid of the cesspol of humanity.

Expand full comment

Isn't she also a dual citizen? Us and jamaica?

Expand full comment

NO......President Trump is better than that Marxist/Communist twit. I say let's go and vote

already. This is utter nonsense. We know what she stands for and that's enough. She

isn't even a NBC. Add that to the list.

Expand full comment

Ever since 9-11, the Liberals ‘threw away “ the US Constitution” ( The Playbook)- and started a

“COUP “ of the government , by placing their own camp followers in all of the alphabet agencies

and have now thoroughly corrupted every single one of them- BeCause the GOP was too “ Self -Immersed” with grandstanding oratory bullshit so , no my dear friend The Liberals now are making their “ own Rules” - and this is what the Conservatives get for “GOING ALONG TO GET ALONG"

Expand full comment

Why do you characterize her assisting Obama et al to flood the country with aliens 'ineptitude'? Seems she did an exceptional job as Border[less] Czar.

Expand full comment
author

she damaged USA bigtime, our girls are in trouble due to her today

Expand full comment

The total sum of the ASSministrations of ovomit and biDUMB equate to a car with no engine, driven by a blind man with no legs being aided by someone with no head. It is summarily useless and error laden choosing the worst possible decisions that create confusion and maladies calculated to weaken and attack Freedom and Justice. Every western nation had its own fake leaders who were enemies of all that is good. There were few if any exceptions to the formula calculated to destroy once ordered and beneficial policies.

Expand full comment
author

your view on ovomit matches mine, always did

Expand full comment