Watson et al. mathematical modelling study of COVID gene vaccination said that vaccinations prevented 14·4 million (95% credible interval [Crl] 13·7–15·9) deaths from COVID-19 in 185 countries
Watson et al. mathematical modelling study of COVID gene vaccination said that vaccinations prevented 14·4 million (95% credible interval [Crl] 13·7–15·9) deaths from COVID-19 in 185 countries
and territories between Dec 8, 2020, and Dec 8, 2021; Klement et al. then said NO, that this SEIR trained model is flawed and cautions against believing in its predictions; oversimplified the complex
Listen carefully. It takes a lot of education and science experience to understand and properly interpret science STUDIES, such as this one.
It uses MODEL()S , the worst form of evidence, and one can statistically manipulate a study to say almost anything!
Thus, MODELLING science studies FAIL all science standards and ethics, and are considered as the LEAST reliable source.
In fact , there are many other far superior methods to conduct science or medical studies, so ask why would any decent scientist or doctor chose to use models.
Sadly, modelling studies are often pushed hard, and PUT UP FRONT into the eyes and ears to justify FALSE and unreliable BOGUS science, by corrupt GOVT and health authorities INVOLVED in outright lies and malfesance .
Why? Because it easily hood -winks the unsuspecting public , into believing LIES for inducing fear, as they are NOT educated in this area .
These deceptive studies can really do a lot of harm and damage.
Canada , was literally the WORST country in the world for constantly inducing fear by using " modelling studies done by those with serious conflict of interest.
This is true medical malpractice and malfeasence IMHO . This study is GARBAGE.
If you want an even deeper dive, into the dirty tactics of big corrupt pharma, read the book HOW TO LIE WITH STATISTICS.
I do NOT want you to take my word for it! I
I CAN and will PROVE THIS.
So below, I am LINKING the science video that teaches this topic, and explains it carefully .
This video was put together by over 500 Canadian EXPERT doctors and scientists.
It is superbly done, allows most lay people to mainly understand much of it science , and tells the whole factual truth.
It also covers many other really good "must know" topics so you won't ever be fooled again.
It also as examples teaches RRR versus ARR.
About 38 minutes long - in total,
PLEASE GO TO about MINUTE 01:30 to 2:00 and watch for the portion about MODELS and associated studies.
They outline as poor evidence and thus are good at misrepresenting the truth.
Typically models can present
FALSE, almost useless science.
Beware of ALL studies that rely on modelling .
Worse the MAJORITY of such studies are LOADED with conflict of interest and serious false claims. Many uneducated will not see this.
Your eyes and ears WILL pop when you hear the massive conflict of interest of Moderna shareholder studies, where 8 Billion dollars was earned.
Yes that is billions with a B. I think most scientist would say anything for EIGHT BILLION.
In summary, I STRONGLY suggest the viewer watch all 38 minutes of this super professional teaching video.
I rate it a ten out of ten as it is LOADED with science and teaching info and depicts malfeasance, and what I even criminal law CONFLICT.
Our super hero , and our knowledgeable Dr. Paul Alexander will even love this one and this group of doctors walking the high road.
Again modelling starts around 1 minute:40 second mark.
Ps - You should ALSO FOLLOW and SUPPORT (if you can) this group of truth telling Canadian physicians and scientists, whom refused to be silenced or look away . They are forever heros.
So how was the model validated? In the absence of controls how was 'vaccine' effectiveness determined ... oh, that was modeled too. Circular reasoning. We already know negative risk benefit. We already know an ARR of 0.43% for Pfizer ie. useless. We already know recurrent doses lead to increasing incidence of sickness.
How were cases determined....oh, RT-PCR ... cycle threshold anyone....
WEF/WHO/CEPI Plandemic. The goal to jab the World, seize control and never stop.
Besides all the modeling flaws, another issue is the focus on "lives lost" vs. "years of life lost" or a more difficult but interesting measure "years of health lost".
Much of the focus of Big Govt, Big Pharma, and Big Healthcare (actually sick care) in the past 3.5 years has been on very crude draconian measures. If those measures accomplished anything besides enriching the rich and empowering the powerful, it was shifting the burden of the plandemic from the elderly to the young. So much for caring about "the children"...
“So the suggestion that the vaccines saved 20 million lives is science fiction, not scientific fact, because the study that this comes from is very poor quality observational study. When you look at a higher quality level of evidence - in fact, even Pfizer’s own randomized control trial didn’t show any reduction in covid mortality of any statistical significance. It showed NO reduction in all-cause mortality.”
This is IMPORTANT.
Listen carefully. It takes a lot of education and science experience to understand and properly interpret science STUDIES, such as this one.
It uses MODEL()S , the worst form of evidence, and one can statistically manipulate a study to say almost anything!
Thus, MODELLING science studies FAIL all science standards and ethics, and are considered as the LEAST reliable source.
In fact , there are many other far superior methods to conduct science or medical studies, so ask why would any decent scientist or doctor chose to use models.
Sadly, modelling studies are often pushed hard, and PUT UP FRONT into the eyes and ears to justify FALSE and unreliable BOGUS science, by corrupt GOVT and health authorities INVOLVED in outright lies and malfesance .
Why? Because it easily hood -winks the unsuspecting public , into believing LIES for inducing fear, as they are NOT educated in this area .
These deceptive studies can really do a lot of harm and damage.
Canada , was literally the WORST country in the world for constantly inducing fear by using " modelling studies done by those with serious conflict of interest.
This is true medical malpractice and malfeasence IMHO . This study is GARBAGE.
If you want an even deeper dive, into the dirty tactics of big corrupt pharma, read the book HOW TO LIE WITH STATISTICS.
I do NOT want you to take my word for it! I
I CAN and will PROVE THIS.
So below, I am LINKING the science video that teaches this topic, and explains it carefully .
This video was put together by over 500 Canadian EXPERT doctors and scientists.
It is superbly done, allows most lay people to mainly understand much of it science , and tells the whole factual truth.
It also covers many other really good "must know" topics so you won't ever be fooled again.
It also as examples teaches RRR versus ARR.
About 38 minutes long - in total,
PLEASE GO TO about MINUTE 01:30 to 2:00 and watch for the portion about MODELS and associated studies.
They outline as poor evidence and thus are good at misrepresenting the truth.
Typically models can present
FALSE, almost useless science.
Beware of ALL studies that rely on modelling .
Worse the MAJORITY of such studies are LOADED with conflict of interest and serious false claims. Many uneducated will not see this.
Your eyes and ears WILL pop when you hear the massive conflict of interest of Moderna shareholder studies, where 8 Billion dollars was earned.
Yes that is billions with a B. I think most scientist would say anything for EIGHT BILLION.
In summary, I STRONGLY suggest the viewer watch all 38 minutes of this super professional teaching video.
I rate it a ten out of ten as it is LOADED with science and teaching info and depicts malfeasance, and what I even criminal law CONFLICT.
Our super hero , and our knowledgeable Dr. Paul Alexander will even love this one and this group of doctors walking the high road.
Again modelling starts around 1 minute:40 second mark.
Ps - You should ALSO FOLLOW and SUPPORT (if you can) this group of truth telling Canadian physicians and scientists, whom refused to be silenced or look away . They are forever heros.
GET on their EMAIL LIST FOR MORE.
Best in health to all.
https://rumble.com/vqx3kb-the-pfizer-inoculations-do-more-harm-than-good.html
The modeling is a fairy tale.
Not even a nice try. Garbage in, garbage out
So how was the model validated? In the absence of controls how was 'vaccine' effectiveness determined ... oh, that was modeled too. Circular reasoning. We already know negative risk benefit. We already know an ARR of 0.43% for Pfizer ie. useless. We already know recurrent doses lead to increasing incidence of sickness.
How were cases determined....oh, RT-PCR ... cycle threshold anyone....
WEF/WHO/CEPI Plandemic. The goal to jab the World, seize control and never stop.
This is so fucking stupid In april 2019 there where 1.61 precent positive tested for Covid-19 in the entire world.
And this includes all tests x 7 times a day for work tests and all the others.
At the same time all active cases where 99.58 precent mild to zero symptoms.
Of the 1.61% which includes everything only 2.19% where deaths!!! This was before the massive jab rollout!!
Reality shows what a fairy tale it is.
Besides all the modeling flaws, another issue is the focus on "lives lost" vs. "years of life lost" or a more difficult but interesting measure "years of health lost".
Much of the focus of Big Govt, Big Pharma, and Big Healthcare (actually sick care) in the past 3.5 years has been on very crude draconian measures. If those measures accomplished anything besides enriching the rich and empowering the powerful, it was shifting the burden of the plandemic from the elderly to the young. So much for caring about "the children"...
agree, the computer only has the information that is input, therefore is manipulated. Which I believe it was. More deception, more lies, of course.
Hindsight 'predictions' like this are impossible. As dependable as a ouija board and similarly manipulated by the person directing it.
I came across this article https://pandata.org/it-is-impossible-that-the-vaccines-saved-14-million-lives-in-2021/ at the PANDA Uncut Substack that I thought did a good job explaining the impossibility of this claim.
Dr. Aseem Malhotra states it perfectly:
“So the suggestion that the vaccines saved 20 million lives is science fiction, not scientific fact, because the study that this comes from is very poor quality observational study. When you look at a higher quality level of evidence - in fact, even Pfizer’s own randomized control trial didn’t show any reduction in covid mortality of any statistical significance. It showed NO reduction in all-cause mortality.”
Garbage in.... garbage out!
What a mountain of horse crap.