and territories between Dec 8, 2020, and Dec 8, 2021; Klement et al. then said NO, that this SEIR trained model is flawed and cautions against believing in its predictions; oversimplified the complex
So how was the model validated? In the absence of controls how was 'vaccine' effectiveness determined ... oh, that was modeled too. Circular reasoning. We already know negative risk benefit. We already know an ARR of 0.43% for Pfizer ie. useless. We already know recurrent doses lead to increasing incidence of sickness.
How were cases determined....oh, RT-PCR ... cycle threshold anyone....
WEF/WHO/CEPI Plandemic. The goal to jab the World, seize control and never stop.
Besides all the modeling flaws, another issue is the focus on "lives lost" vs. "years of life lost" or a more difficult but interesting measure "years of health lost".
Much of the focus of Big Govt, Big Pharma, and Big Healthcare (actually sick care) in the past 3.5 years has been on very crude draconian measures. If those measures accomplished anything besides enriching the rich and empowering the powerful, it was shifting the burden of the plandemic from the elderly to the young. So much for caring about "the children"...
“So the suggestion that the vaccines saved 20 million lives is science fiction, not scientific fact, because the study that this comes from is very poor quality observational study. When you look at a higher quality level of evidence - in fact, even Pfizer’s own randomized control trial didn’t show any reduction in covid mortality of any statistical significance. It showed NO reduction in all-cause mortality.”
The Canadian FLCCC document explaining the Pfizer fraud and ARR vs RRR was one of the most important documents which helped me stay sane and on course once I started my own personal push-back against this iatrogenic terrorism (one coerced gene jab in). I go back to it when things start getting complicated and I can't see the wood for the trees, just to remind myself about some of the core fraudulent actions at play here. That's why I know these models are just bunkum and bs. More Ferguson-type spinning of fake numbers out of fake air.
The modeling is a fairy tale.
Most computer models are pure guesswork.
Agreed. And many, like this one, have an ulterior motive or an agenda to push.
How many climate model studies?
Fifty or so?
How many studies even came close to reality?
ZERO!!!
Not even a nice try. Garbage in, garbage out
So how was the model validated? In the absence of controls how was 'vaccine' effectiveness determined ... oh, that was modeled too. Circular reasoning. We already know negative risk benefit. We already know an ARR of 0.43% for Pfizer ie. useless. We already know recurrent doses lead to increasing incidence of sickness.
How were cases determined....oh, RT-PCR ... cycle threshold anyone....
WEF/WHO/CEPI Plandemic. The goal to jab the World, seize control and never stop.
This is so fucking stupid In april 2019 there where 1.61 precent positive tested for Covid-19 in the entire world.
And this includes all tests x 7 times a day for work tests and all the others.
At the same time all active cases where 99.58 precent mild to zero symptoms.
Of the 1.61% which includes everything only 2.19% where deaths!!! This was before the massive jab rollout!!
Only 2.19% of the 1.61% of the world population that tested positive died!
Reality shows what a fairy tale it is.
Besides all the modeling flaws, another issue is the focus on "lives lost" vs. "years of life lost" or a more difficult but interesting measure "years of health lost".
Much of the focus of Big Govt, Big Pharma, and Big Healthcare (actually sick care) in the past 3.5 years has been on very crude draconian measures. If those measures accomplished anything besides enriching the rich and empowering the powerful, it was shifting the burden of the plandemic from the elderly to the young. So much for caring about "the children"...
agree, the computer only has the information that is input, therefore is manipulated. Which I believe it was. More deception, more lies, of course.
Hindsight 'predictions' like this are impossible. As dependable as a ouija board and similarly manipulated by the person directing it.
I came across this article https://pandata.org/it-is-impossible-that-the-vaccines-saved-14-million-lives-in-2021/ at the PANDA Uncut Substack that I thought did a good job explaining the impossibility of this claim.
Dr. Aseem Malhotra states it perfectly:
“So the suggestion that the vaccines saved 20 million lives is science fiction, not scientific fact, because the study that this comes from is very poor quality observational study. When you look at a higher quality level of evidence - in fact, even Pfizer’s own randomized control trial didn’t show any reduction in covid mortality of any statistical significance. It showed NO reduction in all-cause mortality.”
Garbage in.... garbage out!
What a mountain of horse crap.
Exactly... 70 year old lies.
You forgot the best from 2019, 500 pages and still unrefuted: Turtles All the Way Down.
Here for free:
https://fakeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Turtles-All-The-Way-Down-Vaccine-Science-and-Myth-Anonymous-z-lib.org_.pdf
The Canadian FLCCC document explaining the Pfizer fraud and ARR vs RRR was one of the most important documents which helped me stay sane and on course once I started my own personal push-back against this iatrogenic terrorism (one coerced gene jab in). I go back to it when things start getting complicated and I can't see the wood for the trees, just to remind myself about some of the core fraudulent actions at play here. That's why I know these models are just bunkum and bs. More Ferguson-type spinning of fake numbers out of fake air.
At the same time they hide the true numbers regarding the great harm the injections did and the fatal medical protocols!