"You insinuated that not moving on an issue resulted in stagnation."
That is correct. However, moving on an issue does not mean implementing it without due diligence, nor does it mean sitting on it without moving forward with research.
"You insinuated that not moving on an issue resulted in stagnation."
That is correct. However, moving on an issue does not mean implementing it without due diligence, nor does it mean sitting on it without moving forward with research.
I tend to see common ground here. But I see all around me in the real world sheeple afraid to rock the boat but I want to turn the damned thing right over.
I think both of you are saying the same thing...ha ha...very good exchange...IMO as with mRNA, we need 50 to 100 more years of bench science with rodents, animals etc. to prove safe and strong ethical debate with populations before we even see it again.
"You insinuated that not moving on an issue resulted in stagnation."
That is correct. However, moving on an issue does not mean implementing it without due diligence, nor does it mean sitting on it without moving forward with research.
I tend to see common ground here. But I see all around me in the real world sheeple afraid to rock the boat but I want to turn the damned thing right over.
I think both of you are saying the same thing...ha ha...very good exchange...IMO as with mRNA, we need 50 to 100 more years of bench science with rodents, animals etc. to prove safe and strong ethical debate with populations before we even see it again.