Malone is controlled opposition. Dr. Nass came out the other day and defended him. She is either blinded by this smooth talker or she is also controlled opposition. Malone knows a lot more and I have said this for a long time. He could have stopped this long ago. He told Stew Peters there are things he cannot discuss because it would jeo…
Malone is controlled opposition. Dr. Nass came out the other day and defended him. She is either blinded by this smooth talker or she is also controlled opposition. Malone knows a lot more and I have said this for a long time. He could have stopped this long ago. He told Stew Peters there are things he cannot discuss because it would jeopardize his career and Stew lit Malone up on side and down the other. I believe this is why Malone has a hard on for Peters. You do not swim in the DOD, HHS, NIH, BARDA, WHO swamp for 30 years without either being a swamp creatures or knowing what is going on but keeping your head down.
Great article! I have been saying for months .....something strange about that Dr. Malone something don't feel quite right.........one does not pal around with the cia and ever walk away, it's impossible. They will not let you walk free ever!
I highly doubt Dr. Nass in anything like controlled opposition.
We're all pointing fingers now, aren't we? That includes me; I'm not innocent of this.
Here's my opinion of Malone. He's basically a decent person but has an elevated opinion of himself and quite obviously takes credit for work other people have done. He has stated outright that he is Nobel prize material, and this is quite unbecoming especially if one really is Nobel prize material. He let Breggin get under his skin; I'm not saying Breggin is an angel but cut the guy some slack, he's been poking pharma in the eye for years.
He's flawed. A careful speaker, a smart man, a great deal of knowledge, but flawed. He's making his own bed with his lashing out at Breggin, etc., which of course has caused reciprocal lashing back.
He wants to be a leader and he wants that Nobel prize. But, he lost many of us when the lawsuit happened, and that triggered a lot of questioning and now he feels he's being attacked.
He did it to himself. How about a bit of graciousness and tolerance toward people who disagree with him, and how about we stop taking other people's work and passing it off as our own?
For me, the jury is still out for Malone. I'm very wary of him but I do read his articles. He has some adoring fans on his substack, however. My questions arose from his involvement in mRNA research. Being so close to this, I immediately found it curious that he got the vaccines. Why would he get them? I know far far less about mRNA, but I did know a bit and I knew it had never been successful, so I wasn't about to get the shots. Weird that Malone was so trusting. I don't like this situation with Breggin and others. They should all be on the same side of this issue by now.
Something about his eyes seem to show he is hiding something or there is some dishonesty going on. He squints his eyebrows to see or he looks downward at times in a strange way. At first I thought it was he had protruding brow bones but really its more of an unusual look that is hiding or guilty and an inward thing not an outward thing.
Am I not allowed to have an opinion? Not referring to PTSD, I have it to from military duty. I did not make a snap decision, I've followed him for years!
Desmet says explicitly that the hypnotic state of mass formation was ultimately because the people are mechanistic thinkers and therefore when Covid data came out, the people choose the worst-case scenario because they were saturated with fear prior to Covid. Then all it took was a nudge of propaganda for them to become a hypnotic mass.
Is that really true? Think about what he's saying.
Desmet has it completely backwards. It wasn't a nudge of propaganda. It was a massive and unrelenting assault, 24/7. Remember how it was? We, the people, didn't "choose" the data: the false and distorted data was rammed down our throats, and safe and effective early treatment was viciously and ruthlessly suppressed, but not because we, the people, "asked for it." So much about what we saw on TV was manufactured and I have a specific instance early on, involving Elmhurst hospital in Queens, that convinced me that that particular crisis, blasted throughout America, was 100% fabricated.
I despise what Desmet is saying. Breggin understands. Those who can't see through Desmet are missing the forest for the trees.
For Desmet, it's not at all about how we were abused by the authorities; this is incidental and it was a manipulation that wasn't real manipulation because the ideology of mechanistic thinking did the steering (yes, this is exactly what Desmet says.) It's all about the ideology. And why is it all about the ideology? Because Desmet has to prove there was no conspiracy.
You are being too kind in your interpretation of what Desmet says.
I have a theory that people have a bias for Desmet because he's been so heavily promoted, therefore they have a hard time believing it could possibly be an insidious book and psychobabble. But I'm not the only one who has noticed this. Breggin has, of course, and CJ Hopkins, and Dr. Alexander and Whitney Webb and Tereza Coraggio, to name a few.
I try to pound the table and get the message out because whatever faults Dr. Breggin has, he's right about Desmet: Desmet is the Trojan horse. We need to understand this, and I believe that understanding this helps us to understand what the psychological operation is about, and what the psychopaths are trying to do.
Desmet says there are no cabal psychopaths, and to think there are is to be a conspiracy theorist and Desmet says these people need to be "handled psychologically."
These psychopaths are merely captured by an ideology, that's all.
Apologist for the psychopaths, or what? Trying to wave hands and make them disappear. Most of the people who've read Desmet haven't really read Desmet. Why is Malone promoting him???
I like your sentiment and agree, but truth be told, we have to understand what the psychological operation is, and we have to understand that some actors may not even understand their part in it.
I know lots of people like that. It is NOT, repeat NOT, because they're "mechanistic thinkers." Desmet says it is.
The people I know who are most susceptible to the propaganda and "mass formation" tend to be Deadheads, right? Meaning, followers of the Grateful Dead, an admirable band, or otherwise steeped in the togetherness, love and peace ideology-- which I'm totally with. They are NOT mechanistic thinkers.
The propaganda machine has been working for years and it has worked on the goodness and kindness of people on the left to subtly sway them against America and individual self-determination, and this is done so people don't even understand.
That's what's really happening. This "mechanistic thinking" is just Desmet trying to be like Arendt, whom he can't hold a candle to.
It's foolishness when one trust anything a gov or shot pushing co. who has been fined numerous times for fraud and deceit, have to say. You can tell when they are lying, their lips move!
Nikij said Malone might be blackmailed. My comment means there are times when you need to poke to blackmailers in the eye and do what is right for humanity.
Ivermectin saves why could not find it from any doc I called, some even family friends? doc would not fill pharmacy would not fill. fsmb wags our health care system. How many lives could have been saved? Ask my doc for ivermectin, he said if he did he would be fired, I didn't get Ivm., but he got fired anyway, BY ME!
No, I didn't mean that. Let me explain---F. S. M. B. The Federation of State Medical Boards is a private company located Euless, Texas and Washington, D. C. This is from their website---
FSMB History: A Century of Service to State Medical Boards
Over the course of a century, the FSMB has grown from a small annual gathering of state board executive officers with no permanent staff or headquarters to a vibrant national organization staffed by nearly 200 employees in Texas and our nation's capital.
Since its inception in 1912, the FSMB has grown in the range of its services to state medical and osteopathic boards charged with protecting the public health and interests in their respective states. From providing assessment tools to policy documents, from credentialing to disciplinary alert services, the FSMB has served the interests of its member boards.
"Medical Licensing and Discipline in America: A History of the Federation of State Medical Boards" relates the history of the FSMB and the evolution over several centuries of America’s state-based system for medical licensure and discipline." -----We know very little about fsmn, I do know they employ over 300 in the two story building in Texas. No nothing about the other office in W. The fsmn towers over all State Medical Boards, all S. M. B. belong to fsmb. Why does a private company have authority over all State Medical Boards? Who funds fsmb? Who controls the fsmb? If you wonder, as I have, why my doc would not prescribe Ivermectin, I can tell you why, the fsmb would make sure that Dr. lost his license. You say why, was it for our health? I don't think so? Well, Ivermectin cost a few $ Big Pharma's cure cost $thousands? So could I deduce that maybe Big Pharma was the $$$$ behind fsmb to keep big $$$$ flowing and not allowing Dr. to do their jobs. I know dr. that will cower when I mention fsmb, if they even know about them, for fsmb is so secretive. Fsmb has ruined our medical establishment, why is no one outraged? Probably because no one knows about them. Now you know, do your own research, and pass this post around educate people! We are in a mell of a hess!
A NZ journalist interviewed an American doc living and working there and he said this body, org. was above every other and controlled everything. On Rumble I think.
No! I'm not outraged. I just sit by and watch the world go by. God has a master plan and it's unfolding before our eyes, if, we wake from our slumber. The end is near, 7 years of pure disaster and devastation is around the corner. Humanity cannot hide from this one!
Yes I know. Dr. Ness is a true hero in my book! What is in her heart came out her hands! Jesus said you would know them by the fruits they bare. Matthew 7:15-20 (KJV)
Many Substack author and many posting comments are planted by the PR Team.
Substack is allowed to exist without censorship for the purpose of corralling anti vaxxers into one place and monitoring them - your IP is logged - they know who you are and where you live.
The false actors purpose is to control what you think.
One of the goals is to ensure you go to your death peacefully -- they prefer that you do not turn violent (they don't fear that though - the fangs are ready for you in the form of the anti terrorist squads)...
Notice the messages of mass psychosis and the banality of evil -- essentially there is nobody to blame... it's just a mass movement of insanity that is causing this situation -- there is no group of people --- that can be targeted. No target no violence.
If you attempt to try to work out who the false actors are you'll lose your mind ... it is not possible to do ... the PR Team is the best of the best... they also have psychologists on board... and they cheat. These are the people that get you prepped to support a ridiculous war (e.g. Ukraine)...
They play you along. You may be aware of this but who is friend and foe?
End of the day they are convinced that exterminating us is necessary -- the best option available. To fail is to open the Gates of Hell...
Now if I was controlled opposition ... let's say Deep Throat... would I give you this?
Sure I would - because I know that nobody wants the truth - nobody can handle the truth. Most if not all of you will reject that plan.
But it is the plan - why else would you continue to inject Rat Juice into people when you knew from day one it would not stop covid and it would result in endless mutations... with the risk of creating a 'Marek's' level virus. Why would you then throw Paxlovid at the problem - when you know it also fuels mutation.
They are exterminating us -- before the shit show collapses and we end up on the streets ripping each other's faces off.
Sorry to bring you the bad news.
Anyway - you won't buy into this ... so no harm done... the end goal is a Great Reset... right.. CNNBBC say so -- as does TIME https://time.com/collection/great-reset/
Fast Eddy that was long (whew), but good. Enjoyed it all. They are so drunk with their (preceived) power that they tell us before hand what they are gonna do, and don't care what we think, is that cocky, or is it way over confident. These demon possessed people who are satans children, will spend eternity with satan, false prophet and the beast in the lake of fire to be tormented day and night for ever and ever! God will not let them go unpunished, if he did, God would a lie. That's one thing God cannot do, that is lie.
Exactly! I keep saying, Malone is a Trojan horse sent in to control what is being said about the death shots! When someone says something else or presents evidence about what’s in the death shots, Malone turns on them like a rabid dog and viciously denounces them and/or sues them. He does this to silence dissenting voices. However, the truth, having been exposed to light, is coming out!
The fact that he authored a paper early on that said mRNA was not safe for humans is all we really need to know but even with that paper people are still blindly standing behind him. The rebuttal to Dr. Breggins recent article about Malone by Dr. Nass is very concerning. She is either blinded to the truth or she too is controlled opposition.
Some fighters are even accused of being controlled opposition to numb us down and sink scarce resources. Most assume that they are doing the people’s job and therefore, so “we the people” can relax and do nothing: a classic false flag operation.
In order to have controlled opposition, the person must appear to provide the correct anti-narrative, at least in certain issues, like Berenson (masks, lockdowns, COVID lab-origin, vaccine injuries). The actor has to make his followers believe he is fighting for them, so they can relax.
Under such definition, anyone not suing government and Big Pharma could be a suspect of false flag. For example, some accuse Berenson of suing for himself to recover damages, not the common good.
Moreover, anyone not pointing to the true problem and solutions could also be accused.
The following examples are accusations that should be given the benefit of the doubt: anyone can make mistakes, anyone can commit sins of pride (the higher the easier). Everyone is needed in this war. No-one is expendable!
The slanderers are denying basic humane rights:
• to private fraternal correction
• to be presumed innocent until proven guilty
• to have a good name free of slander
• to defend themselves in direct confrontation
Some of the accused are:
Alex Berenson: attacked HCQ, IVM and vaccine injured.1
Dr. Ryan Cole, says the nano-routers are stacked cholesterol, sugar and salt crystals.2
Dr. Robert Malone, had a long record in the bioweapons complex (10 billion dollars in grants 2012-20173) and was promoting haccinating the elderly before his conversion. He sued freedom fighters like the Breggins, Dr. Peter McCullough (America Out Loud) and Dr. Jane Ruby for 25 million dollars each. 4
By not giving reasons, he left the accusations open.
Some ask: does Malone receive royalties from Pfizer and Moderna for any of his 57 mRNA patents5, some of which are essential for lipid nanoparticles (there are 1814 patents related to Malone and nanoparticles)? Couldn’t he block them from using his patents in making haccines? If he could, wouldn’t he be accomplice to genocide. By denying this without giving reasons, he left the accusations open.
Others say that it’s strange that Malone says he got vaccinated after getting COVID: why wouldn’t an expert like him rely on natural immunity and repurposed drugs? Why would he take an EUA experiment, having worked for decades with mRNA for the Department of Defence and CIA, and knowing the failure in cancer patients and the risk of ADE?
In early 2022 he was still supporting vaccinating the high risk and working for a Bio-defence contract.6
24 Jun 2021 he twitted supporting traitor Andrew Hill calling for more evidence on ivermectin (there were thousands of proven cases along a year and there was no harm trying!): “PLEASE pay attention to Dr. Andrew Hill. He is a very solid and mature data scientist. We speak often, and I have complete confidence in him and his team. Evidence-based medicine, not hype.” Malone was replied: “Sorry Dr. Malone, you must have missed Tess Lawrie statement around her private conversation with Dr. Hill where he admitted pressure from sponsors was the cause of his bogus conclusions.“ He didn’t answer. 7
9 Jan 2023. Musk Twitter was still censoring and shadow banning COVID posts and refused to reinstate many accounts from truthers, yet Twitter reinstated Malone’s account (with many others like Kirsch and McCullough). According to Dr. Ruby’s screenshots 8, Twitter blocked her for posting “What is The Malone Doctrine?”: why would Twitter support Malone by banning Dr. Ruby?:
2 Feb 2023. Malone called for a ban on mRNA and DNA COVID injections, 3 years late. Also, by Jan 2020, Malone had shown that, the same as with SARS-Cov-1 and MERS where they caused ADE in animal testing, they were too dangerous for humans, even experimentally: because of the ADE risk, they should thoroughly be tested on animals. 9 He never mentioned this study until accused by the Breggins in Feb 2023!
Sure I guess anyone can work somewhere for 30 years and not know they are working for criminals but it is highly unlikely when that person is supposedly exceptionally brilliant and who also was the recipient of many millions in grants. Yes people can make mistakes but when they hide their mistakes to cover their butt THAT is what I find unacceptable. Bottom line....Malone through his own writings KNEW mRNA was dangerous and he knew early on this vaccine was dangerous and he said nothing, in my opinion, to protect his career. If you want to take a ridiculous philosophical approach to this go right ahead but I look at the facts. Malone is also a member of the NIH ACTIV. WHY? If he is so convinced the NIH is not a reputable organization why would he have anything to do with them. And how come no one has ever come after his medical license like they have done to McCullough, Kory, Nass, Marik, Cole and many others who have spoken out? There are far to many that have proven trustworthy so to me wasting time on the merits of Dr. Malone are a chance we cannot afford to take.
He could not have single handedly stopped this. Geert and Yeadon were loudly shouting and people should have listened to them but they didn’t. They wouldn’t. Jesus could have come back and told them and they still wouldn’t listen. Why? Because the evil media brainwashed people 24/7. Scared them into a willingness to do anything to save themselves. Let’s start blaming the real criminals. Malone has given people a lot of insight to how this all works and we can use that information to push for real change if we are wise or we can waste time fighting about why he didn’t do more.
We're going through a necessary phase of figuring out the subtleties of the psychological operation. Malone appears to be helping us.
But ...
Malone promoted the supposed genius, and eugenicist, Chris Langan. Watching about two minutes of any interview of Langan should make normal people puke. What was that about? Langan is a charlatan.
Malone promoted and defended Desmet, yet Malone is a smart man and should have been able to parse what Desmet is saying. If not, he should've gotten a clue when Breggin alerted us to Desmet. I've spent a lot of time reading Desmet carefully and I believe the insertion of his ideas is the real Trojan horse. Malone refuses to see. Red flag.
Malone sues Breggin, another huge red flag. Why? To silent a critic of Desmet, since Desmet is a central figure in their disagreement?
So this brings us to: how is the psychological operation working? What was the purpose of inserting Desmet? (I have some ideas and they revolve around absolving the conspirators of blame, which, dammit, is exactly what Desmet does even though he typically says and not-says this in this psychobabble abuse of language.) So who is Robert Malone? I honestly don't know, but I know to be wary. Is he perhaps unknowingly part of the psychological operation? Is he being fed deceptive information? These are honest questions, not accusations.
It is sometimes hard to be objective with someone you trusted and called a friend but the paper by Malone is more than enough to put blame on his shoulders.
I think that there is a degree of back biting going on here that is counter productive. Speaking for myself, I find the crude banter distasteful. You may have points that are worth tossing into the mix, but I would like to propose that we (at least some of us) are venturing to cultivate a society where truth and justice are foundational, but not to the exclusion of civility and kindness. Let’s rise above the demonstrated lower nature of those we seek to contrast ourselves against.
SS is littered with false actors ... many of the anti vax authors are on their side... as are many of those making comments. Do you think the PR Team would not seek to control what you think by using dirty tricks?
Malone is controlled opposition. Dr. Nass came out the other day and defended him. She is either blinded by this smooth talker or she is also controlled opposition. Malone knows a lot more and I have said this for a long time. He could have stopped this long ago. He told Stew Peters there are things he cannot discuss because it would jeopardize his career and Stew lit Malone up on side and down the other. I believe this is why Malone has a hard on for Peters. You do not swim in the DOD, HHS, NIH, BARDA, WHO swamp for 30 years without either being a swamp creatures or knowing what is going on but keeping your head down.
Great article! I have been saying for months .....something strange about that Dr. Malone something don't feel quite right.........one does not pal around with the cia and ever walk away, it's impossible. They will not let you walk free ever!
Look at me people, I'm #1 I invented mRNA - Malone
"How does it feel to have invented the mRNA poison that makes you one of the biggest killers in human history"???
Watch the Malone interview with Rogan,
Malone whines like a little bitch because he didn't get paid off big for 'inventing' mRNA
Not once does Rogan ask "How does it feel to have invented a poison that makes you one of the biggest killers in human history"???
https://bilbobitch.substack.com/p/endgame-where-is-big-pharma-taking
Bc Rogan really is controlled op & a gatekeeper.
Thanks, I missed that one.
I highly doubt Dr. Nass in anything like controlled opposition.
We're all pointing fingers now, aren't we? That includes me; I'm not innocent of this.
Here's my opinion of Malone. He's basically a decent person but has an elevated opinion of himself and quite obviously takes credit for work other people have done. He has stated outright that he is Nobel prize material, and this is quite unbecoming especially if one really is Nobel prize material. He let Breggin get under his skin; I'm not saying Breggin is an angel but cut the guy some slack, he's been poking pharma in the eye for years.
He's flawed. A careful speaker, a smart man, a great deal of knowledge, but flawed. He's making his own bed with his lashing out at Breggin, etc., which of course has caused reciprocal lashing back.
He wants to be a leader and he wants that Nobel prize. But, he lost many of us when the lawsuit happened, and that triggered a lot of questioning and now he feels he's being attacked.
He did it to himself. How about a bit of graciousness and tolerance toward people who disagree with him, and how about we stop taking other people's work and passing it off as our own?
For me, the jury is still out for Malone. I'm very wary of him but I do read his articles. He has some adoring fans on his substack, however. My questions arose from his involvement in mRNA research. Being so close to this, I immediately found it curious that he got the vaccines. Why would he get them? I know far far less about mRNA, but I did know a bit and I knew it had never been successful, so I wasn't about to get the shots. Weird that Malone was so trusting. I don't like this situation with Breggin and others. They should all be on the same side of this issue by now.
...something strange about Malone something very strange.....
Something about his eyes seem to show he is hiding something or there is some dishonesty going on. He squints his eyebrows to see or he looks downward at times in a strange way. At first I thought it was he had protruding brow bones but really its more of an unusual look that is hiding or guilty and an inward thing not an outward thing.
Some one say he had, in the past, PTSD, can't confirm tho.
You said a mouth full with stand! Ephesians 6:12-17 (KJV)
Am I not allowed to have an opinion? Not referring to PTSD, I have it to from military duty. I did not make a snap decision, I've followed him for years!
Stop the semantics please! You go off on wild tangents and I close my ears, but alas even hate speech is free speech. Even cnn............
I'm still free!
Always free, glad you said friend howbout we stay that way!
Breggin doesn't like Desmet. Malone does. That's part of the rift.
I think Desmet talks nonsense.
Desmet says explicitly that the hypnotic state of mass formation was ultimately because the people are mechanistic thinkers and therefore when Covid data came out, the people choose the worst-case scenario because they were saturated with fear prior to Covid. Then all it took was a nudge of propaganda for them to become a hypnotic mass.
Is that really true? Think about what he's saying.
Desmet has it completely backwards. It wasn't a nudge of propaganda. It was a massive and unrelenting assault, 24/7. Remember how it was? We, the people, didn't "choose" the data: the false and distorted data was rammed down our throats, and safe and effective early treatment was viciously and ruthlessly suppressed, but not because we, the people, "asked for it." So much about what we saw on TV was manufactured and I have a specific instance early on, involving Elmhurst hospital in Queens, that convinced me that that particular crisis, blasted throughout America, was 100% fabricated.
I despise what Desmet is saying. Breggin understands. Those who can't see through Desmet are missing the forest for the trees.
For Desmet, it's not at all about how we were abused by the authorities; this is incidental and it was a manipulation that wasn't real manipulation because the ideology of mechanistic thinking did the steering (yes, this is exactly what Desmet says.) It's all about the ideology. And why is it all about the ideology? Because Desmet has to prove there was no conspiracy.
It's an insidious book he wrote.
You are being too kind in your interpretation of what Desmet says.
I have a theory that people have a bias for Desmet because he's been so heavily promoted, therefore they have a hard time believing it could possibly be an insidious book and psychobabble. But I'm not the only one who has noticed this. Breggin has, of course, and CJ Hopkins, and Dr. Alexander and Whitney Webb and Tereza Coraggio, to name a few.
I try to pound the table and get the message out because whatever faults Dr. Breggin has, he's right about Desmet: Desmet is the Trojan horse. We need to understand this, and I believe that understanding this helps us to understand what the psychological operation is about, and what the psychopaths are trying to do.
First, Malone has to drop the lawsuit.
He will not. That in itself is a tell.
Desmet says there are no cabal psychopaths, and to think there are is to be a conspiracy theorist and Desmet says these people need to be "handled psychologically."
These psychopaths are merely captured by an ideology, that's all.
Apologist for the psychopaths, or what? Trying to wave hands and make them disappear. Most of the people who've read Desmet haven't really read Desmet. Why is Malone promoting him???
I like your sentiment and agree, but truth be told, we have to understand what the psychological operation is, and we have to understand that some actors may not even understand their part in it.
Malone has never backed off of support for Desmet. The lawsuit on Breggin involves the dispute over Desmet, among other things.
Malone does not like what Breggin says about Desmet.
I know lots of people like that. It is NOT, repeat NOT, because they're "mechanistic thinkers." Desmet says it is.
The people I know who are most susceptible to the propaganda and "mass formation" tend to be Deadheads, right? Meaning, followers of the Grateful Dead, an admirable band, or otherwise steeped in the togetherness, love and peace ideology-- which I'm totally with. They are NOT mechanistic thinkers.
The propaganda machine has been working for years and it has worked on the goodness and kindness of people on the left to subtly sway them against America and individual self-determination, and this is done so people don't even understand.
That's what's really happening. This "mechanistic thinking" is just Desmet trying to be like Arendt, whom he can't hold a candle to.
It's foolishness when one trust anything a gov or shot pushing co. who has been fined numerous times for fraud and deceit, have to say. You can tell when they are lying, their lips move!
I can't!
Also, one more option -- Blackmailed into that role as controlled opposition, as it appears this could be a method used by the powers in the shadows.
VERY possible but there comes a time when people must fall on the sword for humanity.
Sorry, I'm a little slow today. I don't understand, please elaborate!
Nikij said Malone might be blackmailed. My comment means there are times when you need to poke to blackmailers in the eye and do what is right for humanity.
Got it. Thanks, just a little slow today.
fsmb Is the biggest problem?
Ivermectin saves why could not find it from any doc I called, some even family friends? doc would not fill pharmacy would not fill. fsmb wags our health care system. How many lives could have been saved? Ask my doc for ivermectin, he said if he did he would be fired, I didn't get Ivm., but he got fired anyway, BY ME!
If enough dr's stood together I believe things would change! When one stands up for what they believe it, what is right, it will cost them something!
No, I didn't mean that. Let me explain---F. S. M. B. The Federation of State Medical Boards is a private company located Euless, Texas and Washington, D. C. This is from their website---
FSMB History: A Century of Service to State Medical Boards
Over the course of a century, the FSMB has grown from a small annual gathering of state board executive officers with no permanent staff or headquarters to a vibrant national organization staffed by nearly 200 employees in Texas and our nation's capital.
Since its inception in 1912, the FSMB has grown in the range of its services to state medical and osteopathic boards charged with protecting the public health and interests in their respective states. From providing assessment tools to policy documents, from credentialing to disciplinary alert services, the FSMB has served the interests of its member boards.
"Medical Licensing and Discipline in America: A History of the Federation of State Medical Boards" relates the history of the FSMB and the evolution over several centuries of America’s state-based system for medical licensure and discipline." -----We know very little about fsmn, I do know they employ over 300 in the two story building in Texas. No nothing about the other office in W. The fsmn towers over all State Medical Boards, all S. M. B. belong to fsmb. Why does a private company have authority over all State Medical Boards? Who funds fsmb? Who controls the fsmb? If you wonder, as I have, why my doc would not prescribe Ivermectin, I can tell you why, the fsmb would make sure that Dr. lost his license. You say why, was it for our health? I don't think so? Well, Ivermectin cost a few $ Big Pharma's cure cost $thousands? So could I deduce that maybe Big Pharma was the $$$$ behind fsmb to keep big $$$$ flowing and not allowing Dr. to do their jobs. I know dr. that will cower when I mention fsmb, if they even know about them, for fsmb is so secretive. Fsmb has ruined our medical establishment, why is no one outraged? Probably because no one knows about them. Now you know, do your own research, and pass this post around educate people! We are in a mell of a hess!
Formed in 1912? Isn't that around the time other very important events occurred in History???
Hummmmmm. Maybe federal reserve? It's not federal, has nothing to do with gov.--wait, I believe i'm preaching to the choir?!
A NZ journalist interviewed an American doc living and working there and he said this body, org. was above every other and controlled everything. On Rumble I think.
I had that interview and lost it. Will go hunting again, thanks!
No! I'm not outraged. I just sit by and watch the world go by. God has a master plan and it's unfolding before our eyes, if, we wake from our slumber. The end is near, 7 years of pure disaster and devastation is around the corner. Humanity cannot hide from this one!
Yes I know. Dr. Ness is a true hero in my book! What is in her heart came out her hands! Jesus said you would know them by the fruits they bare. Matthew 7:15-20 (KJV)
Malone = Deep State.
Many Substack author and many posting comments are planted by the PR Team.
Substack is allowed to exist without censorship for the purpose of corralling anti vaxxers into one place and monitoring them - your IP is logged - they know who you are and where you live.
The false actors purpose is to control what you think.
One of the goals is to ensure you go to your death peacefully -- they prefer that you do not turn violent (they don't fear that though - the fangs are ready for you in the form of the anti terrorist squads)...
Notice the messages of mass psychosis and the banality of evil -- essentially there is nobody to blame... it's just a mass movement of insanity that is causing this situation -- there is no group of people --- that can be targeted. No target no violence.
If you attempt to try to work out who the false actors are you'll lose your mind ... it is not possible to do ... the PR Team is the best of the best... they also have psychologists on board... and they cheat. These are the people that get you prepped to support a ridiculous war (e.g. Ukraine)...
They play you along. You may be aware of this but who is friend and foe?
End of the day they are convinced that exterminating us is necessary -- the best option available. To fail is to open the Gates of Hell...
Now if I was controlled opposition ... let's say Deep Throat... would I give you this?
https://www.headsupster.com/forumthread?shortId=220
Sure I would - because I know that nobody wants the truth - nobody can handle the truth. Most if not all of you will reject that plan.
But it is the plan - why else would you continue to inject Rat Juice into people when you knew from day one it would not stop covid and it would result in endless mutations... with the risk of creating a 'Marek's' level virus. Why would you then throw Paxlovid at the problem - when you know it also fuels mutation.
They are exterminating us -- before the shit show collapses and we end up on the streets ripping each other's faces off.
Sorry to bring you the bad news.
Anyway - you won't buy into this ... so no harm done... the end goal is a Great Reset... right.. CNNBBC say so -- as does TIME https://time.com/collection/great-reset/
Fast Eddy that was long (whew), but good. Enjoyed it all. They are so drunk with their (preceived) power that they tell us before hand what they are gonna do, and don't care what we think, is that cocky, or is it way over confident. These demon possessed people who are satans children, will spend eternity with satan, false prophet and the beast in the lake of fire to be tormented day and night for ever and ever! God will not let them go unpunished, if he did, God would a lie. That's one thing God cannot do, that is lie.
They may be acting out of necessity... doing was it perceived as 'evil' ... with the end game being 'good'.
Hummmmmmmmmmmmmm?
Every article headline from this @rse-wipe propagandist comic actually turned my stomach: it’s full of rotten garbage.
But thanks for the alert.
Exactly! I keep saying, Malone is a Trojan horse sent in to control what is being said about the death shots! When someone says something else or presents evidence about what’s in the death shots, Malone turns on them like a rabid dog and viciously denounces them and/or sues them. He does this to silence dissenting voices. However, the truth, having been exposed to light, is coming out!
The fact that he authored a paper early on that said mRNA was not safe for humans is all we really need to know but even with that paper people are still blindly standing behind him. The rebuttal to Dr. Breggins recent article about Malone by Dr. Nass is very concerning. She is either blinded to the truth or she too is controlled opposition.
False flags or slander?
Some fighters are even accused of being controlled opposition to numb us down and sink scarce resources. Most assume that they are doing the people’s job and therefore, so “we the people” can relax and do nothing: a classic false flag operation.
In order to have controlled opposition, the person must appear to provide the correct anti-narrative, at least in certain issues, like Berenson (masks, lockdowns, COVID lab-origin, vaccine injuries). The actor has to make his followers believe he is fighting for them, so they can relax.
Under such definition, anyone not suing government and Big Pharma could be a suspect of false flag. For example, some accuse Berenson of suing for himself to recover damages, not the common good.
Moreover, anyone not pointing to the true problem and solutions could also be accused.
The following examples are accusations that should be given the benefit of the doubt: anyone can make mistakes, anyone can commit sins of pride (the higher the easier). Everyone is needed in this war. No-one is expendable!
The slanderers are denying basic humane rights:
• to private fraternal correction
• to be presumed innocent until proven guilty
• to have a good name free of slander
• to defend themselves in direct confrontation
Some of the accused are:
Alex Berenson: attacked HCQ, IVM and vaccine injured.1
Dr. Ryan Cole, says the nano-routers are stacked cholesterol, sugar and salt crystals.2
Dr. Robert Malone, had a long record in the bioweapons complex (10 billion dollars in grants 2012-20173) and was promoting haccinating the elderly before his conversion. He sued freedom fighters like the Breggins, Dr. Peter McCullough (America Out Loud) and Dr. Jane Ruby for 25 million dollars each. 4
By not giving reasons, he left the accusations open.
Some ask: does Malone receive royalties from Pfizer and Moderna for any of his 57 mRNA patents5, some of which are essential for lipid nanoparticles (there are 1814 patents related to Malone and nanoparticles)? Couldn’t he block them from using his patents in making haccines? If he could, wouldn’t he be accomplice to genocide. By denying this without giving reasons, he left the accusations open.
Others say that it’s strange that Malone says he got vaccinated after getting COVID: why wouldn’t an expert like him rely on natural immunity and repurposed drugs? Why would he take an EUA experiment, having worked for decades with mRNA for the Department of Defence and CIA, and knowing the failure in cancer patients and the risk of ADE?
In early 2022 he was still supporting vaccinating the high risk and working for a Bio-defence contract.6
24 Jun 2021 he twitted supporting traitor Andrew Hill calling for more evidence on ivermectin (there were thousands of proven cases along a year and there was no harm trying!): “PLEASE pay attention to Dr. Andrew Hill. He is a very solid and mature data scientist. We speak often, and I have complete confidence in him and his team. Evidence-based medicine, not hype.” Malone was replied: “Sorry Dr. Malone, you must have missed Tess Lawrie statement around her private conversation with Dr. Hill where he admitted pressure from sponsors was the cause of his bogus conclusions.“ He didn’t answer. 7
9 Jan 2023. Musk Twitter was still censoring and shadow banning COVID posts and refused to reinstate many accounts from truthers, yet Twitter reinstated Malone’s account (with many others like Kirsch and McCullough). According to Dr. Ruby’s screenshots 8, Twitter blocked her for posting “What is The Malone Doctrine?”: why would Twitter support Malone by banning Dr. Ruby?:
2 Feb 2023. Malone called for a ban on mRNA and DNA COVID injections, 3 years late. Also, by Jan 2020, Malone had shown that, the same as with SARS-Cov-1 and MERS where they caused ADE in animal testing, they were too dangerous for humans, even experimentally: because of the ADE risk, they should thoroughly be tested on animals. 9 He never mentioned this study until accused by the Breggins in Feb 2023!
You might like this:
The next threats and the solution:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed
In that substack, I'm about to post something huge !
Sure I guess anyone can work somewhere for 30 years and not know they are working for criminals but it is highly unlikely when that person is supposedly exceptionally brilliant and who also was the recipient of many millions in grants. Yes people can make mistakes but when they hide their mistakes to cover their butt THAT is what I find unacceptable. Bottom line....Malone through his own writings KNEW mRNA was dangerous and he knew early on this vaccine was dangerous and he said nothing, in my opinion, to protect his career. If you want to take a ridiculous philosophical approach to this go right ahead but I look at the facts. Malone is also a member of the NIH ACTIV. WHY? If he is so convinced the NIH is not a reputable organization why would he have anything to do with them. And how come no one has ever come after his medical license like they have done to McCullough, Kory, Nass, Marik, Cole and many others who have spoken out? There are far to many that have proven trustworthy so to me wasting time on the merits of Dr. Malone are a chance we cannot afford to take.
Very insightful, thanks.
He could not have single handedly stopped this. Geert and Yeadon were loudly shouting and people should have listened to them but they didn’t. They wouldn’t. Jesus could have come back and told them and they still wouldn’t listen. Why? Because the evil media brainwashed people 24/7. Scared them into a willingness to do anything to save themselves. Let’s start blaming the real criminals. Malone has given people a lot of insight to how this all works and we can use that information to push for real change if we are wise or we can waste time fighting about why he didn’t do more.
We're going through a necessary phase of figuring out the subtleties of the psychological operation. Malone appears to be helping us.
But ...
Malone promoted the supposed genius, and eugenicist, Chris Langan. Watching about two minutes of any interview of Langan should make normal people puke. What was that about? Langan is a charlatan.
Malone promoted and defended Desmet, yet Malone is a smart man and should have been able to parse what Desmet is saying. If not, he should've gotten a clue when Breggin alerted us to Desmet. I've spent a lot of time reading Desmet carefully and I believe the insertion of his ideas is the real Trojan horse. Malone refuses to see. Red flag.
Malone sues Breggin, another huge red flag. Why? To silent a critic of Desmet, since Desmet is a central figure in their disagreement?
So this brings us to: how is the psychological operation working? What was the purpose of inserting Desmet? (I have some ideas and they revolve around absolving the conspirators of blame, which, dammit, is exactly what Desmet does even though he typically says and not-says this in this psychobabble abuse of language.) So who is Robert Malone? I honestly don't know, but I know to be wary. Is he perhaps unknowingly part of the psychological operation? Is he being fed deceptive information? These are honest questions, not accusations.
You are right!
Pertinent observation.
That's why Peters' network is part of his lawfare. And Nass is blinded, the way women get blinded.
It is sometimes hard to be objective with someone you trusted and called a friend but the paper by Malone is more than enough to put blame on his shoulders.
Well said!
Boom!
I think that there is a degree of back biting going on here that is counter productive. Speaking for myself, I find the crude banter distasteful. You may have points that are worth tossing into the mix, but I would like to propose that we (at least some of us) are venturing to cultivate a society where truth and justice are foundational, but not to the exclusion of civility and kindness. Let’s rise above the demonstrated lower nature of those we seek to contrast ourselves against.
SS is littered with false actors ... many of the anti vax authors are on their side... as are many of those making comments. Do you think the PR Team would not seek to control what you think by using dirty tricks?
Will Malone concede malicious intent after this?
https://metatron.substack.com/p/midazolam-in-italy
https://www.drugs.com/mtm/midazolam.html
You should not use midazolam if you are allergic to it, or if you have:
narrow-angle glaucoma;
untreated or uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma; or
an allergy to cherries.
Tell your doctor if you have ever had:
glaucoma;
breathing problems; or
congestive heart failure.
Tell your doctor if you are pregnant or breastfeeding.
Can I have an opinion?
They have my enemy for 50 years! You must not know your history?