What did Robert Malone mean after the media accredited biochemist Katalin Karikó as being an mRNA-vaccine pioneer when he told her in e-mail exchanges “This is not going to end well,”; meaning what?
What did Robert Malone mean after the media accredited biochemist Katalin Karikó as being an mRNA-vaccine pioneer when he told her in e-mail exchanges “This is not going to end well,”; meaning what?
What did he mean? Karikó responded; while Malone tells everyone that he is her mentor, she said he is NOT & she said "It’s Malone, who has been overstating his accomplishments."
Malone is controlled opposition. Dr. Nass came out the other day and defended him. She is either blinded by this smooth talker or she is also controlled opposition. Malone knows a lot more and I have said this for a long time. He could have stopped this long ago. He told Stew Peters there are things he cannot discuss because it would jeopardize his career and Stew lit Malone up on side and down the other. I believe this is why Malone has a hard on for Peters. You do not swim in the DOD, HHS, NIH, BARDA, WHO swamp for 30 years without either being a swamp creatures or knowing what is going on but keeping your head down.
I posted this comment in Meryl Nass' "Malone v Breggin" article:
"I worked with Dr. Malone beginning in July 2021 and his concerns about the safety of the vaccines were present then and have been expressed consistently since." Back in July of 2021 Malone was still openly recommending these "vaccines" for the elderly; thus, given what he knew back then he was pushing for eldercide. That is all the Breggin's needed to point out to make their overarching point.
Listen to Malone describe what many of us call the "plandemic.":
"Where I'm at now is what we’re observing is a scripted response that has been pioneered in multiple war games by a small cadre of individuals, largely at Johns Hopkins University, largely funded by Bill and Melinda Gates and the World Economic Forum – that’s all true -- involving multiple government officials. And as the war games become more sophisticated -- and I've participated in some of these, too, although not the Hopkins‘ one, and that’s, that's why the strategy that Peter [Navarro] and I have advocated (of course we were labeled right-wing kooks) in the Washington Times is still a very balanced approach: jab the elders and the ones at high risk. "
That's some pretty jaw-dropping information flowing there, at least right up to a sentence-ending non-sequitors about his balanced approach to the "jab."
To wit: "We're observing" "a scripted response" (some call it living through hell) "pioneered" (happy word) in "multiple war games" (public health is no longer even a pretext) funded by the cabal (his wife's influencers) in which he, himself, participated! Today, of course, he's playing opposition leader against this "scripted response." Was that part of the war games, too?
I should note that Malone forgot to mention a key participant, one he isn't usually loathe to talk about. In fact, it's the key participant, according to Robert Kennedy Jr., author of The Real Anthony Fauci. (Dr. Malone appears in the book's list of acknowledgements.).
In November 2021, Kennedy described the same sequence of events this way:
When I researched my book what I learned was that this [2019 pandemic simulation] event, Event 201, was not a one-time occurrence. We found 20 separate pandemic simulations beginning in 2000. One thing they had in common -- most of them Bill Gates was involved in, Tony Fauci was involved in -- but every one of them the CIA was involved in. The CIA wrote the script, high-level CIA officials participated in every one of those pandemic simulations.
And they involved hundreds of thousands of people. They were conducted secretly. They used frontline workers, they were training police, and hospital systems and utilities in Europe, in Italy, in Germany, in Canada, in Australia, all at the same time, to do a response to a pandemic, but it was not a public health response. It was a response to use the pandemic for something else.
So they practiced again and again and again: How to use the pandemic as a pretext for imposing totalitarian controls and for obliterating liberal democracy across the planet.'
Robert Malone talks about a lot of things, but I have never heard him open up about anything like this. Something I learned along the way is to be skeptical about "defectors" who don't tell you anything you don't already know about the inner workings of the enemy. Now, it's possible Malone completely missed the CIA presence Kennedy has identified as a constant, and that the pandemic planning "for obliterating liberal democracy across the planet" went over his head. But the omission is something worth noting.
I think it’s fair to question ALL of Malone’s motives. The red flags were shot out of a cannon when he initiated a lawsuit against Peter & Ginger Breggin! Give me a possible motive for that other than arrogance & thin skinned. I do not see him as a team player against big gov & big pharma, a battle we must win!
Scientists arguing over who contributed more to mRNA vaccines is like marine architects fighting over who contributed more to the Titanic design. I think they all still don’t quite get it. They think ultimately there is a ‘there’ there.
Excellent and intrepid call for answers. I really appreciate this. Thank you, Dr. Alexander. It is important for all participants in the health freedom movement to hold to a high standard. No exceptions.
At another site a poster pointed out that Dr. Malone has not chosen to sue any portion of the Covid Pandemic machine. This really hit me. If he wanted to sue somebody, why not sue those who refuse to set a threshold for injury and death by these jabs? Instead, he sues other activists in the health freedom efforts? Not good. Not good.
And your list helps to put this in further perspective. Thank you.
I don't buy this political post especially since Paul seems hell bent on attacking Malone with vituperative language and accusations. We know Wikipedia erased Malone's name as part of the govt assault on medical researchers and practitioners who questioned the Covid narrative and this post seems to reflect the same. This Kati person sounds like she has accepted the censorship ongoing. Reading Malone's quoted comment does not read as a threat to her but more like a warning that promoting these mRNA drugs will not bode well for anyone. In reading his posts I find his language very low key and seems to have a spiritual lean to them--quite the opposite of Paul's hyperbole with anything that he does not like.
I am finding the infighting between our covid heroes tiring and get the sense the adult in the room, must step in and ask all,parties to find a middle ground and stop wasting their time. It serves no purpose other than to divide us. I am not a proponent of that, and think most of us who have questioned the safety of covid vaxxes, the origins of sars cov2, lockdowns, masks, school closures, business closures, working from home, social distancing, track and trace, PCR tests, would like to continue our efforts towards sanity.
I was convinced not to take the shot by Malone’s appearance on the Dark Horse podcast in June 2021. Not sure what more he was supposed to do at that point in time. No one knew him and he had no platform.
I’ve seen multiple videos where Malone and Vanden Bossche appear together. There didn’t seem to be any animosity.
I think this article deals clearly with Malone’s contribution to MRNA:
I’m just a regular guy trying to figure all this out. I have to decide who’s credible based on the information in front of me. At this point, Malone is more credible.
Going forward I’m going to focus on sources that provide sound, scientific basis for opposition to the medical driven tyranny. Bomb throwers and fabulists are a waste of time and energy. As this substack is becoming more unhinged, I think I’ll move on.
McCullough has a Substack too. He hasn't raised any concerns regarding this. He's a freedom warrior and if something were wrong, he would be the first to speak out! Maybe you should talk to him regarding your concerns. He may know since he seems very close with Malone.
Dr. Malone has said that he thought his colleagues had fixed the issues he had noted with the MRNA use in vaccines. That trust in his peers is why he actually took the vaccine so he could travel. I believe he also says that his second shot left him injured.
I've been patient with you throughout you support of criminal Trump, and now with your attacks on Malone, and the decision you are causing in the movement, I have to unsubscribe from you. You are not a trustworthy source for information,
Why are any of us falling for the oldest globalist game in the book: get the advocates for freedom / truth / health to turn on each other, discredit each other, and take each other out at the knees??? tsf.
“None of your threats to pull donor money, shove it! Up yours! You should not have ______”
This rhetoric is not professional nor helpful to your credibility.
A reader commented last week asking you, good doctor, to tone down your hyperbole & vitriol. NOT your passion, but your expression of it. Reader has a valid point that sharing your writings with our less informed contacts won’t attract them as we’d like. You give updates of News & information but it can be drowned out with over-the-top word slinging.
Malone is controlled opposition. Dr. Nass came out the other day and defended him. She is either blinded by this smooth talker or she is also controlled opposition. Malone knows a lot more and I have said this for a long time. He could have stopped this long ago. He told Stew Peters there are things he cannot discuss because it would jeopardize his career and Stew lit Malone up on side and down the other. I believe this is why Malone has a hard on for Peters. You do not swim in the DOD, HHS, NIH, BARDA, WHO swamp for 30 years without either being a swamp creatures or knowing what is going on but keeping your head down.
I posted this comment in Meryl Nass' "Malone v Breggin" article:
"I worked with Dr. Malone beginning in July 2021 and his concerns about the safety of the vaccines were present then and have been expressed consistently since." Back in July of 2021 Malone was still openly recommending these "vaccines" for the elderly; thus, given what he knew back then he was pushing for eldercide. That is all the Breggin's needed to point out to make their overarching point.
Highly recommend reading all of this post by Diana West: https://dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryId/4421/Dr-Robert-Malone-A-Risk-Analysis.aspx
Listen to Malone describe what many of us call the "plandemic.":
"Where I'm at now is what we’re observing is a scripted response that has been pioneered in multiple war games by a small cadre of individuals, largely at Johns Hopkins University, largely funded by Bill and Melinda Gates and the World Economic Forum – that’s all true -- involving multiple government officials. And as the war games become more sophisticated -- and I've participated in some of these, too, although not the Hopkins‘ one, and that’s, that's why the strategy that Peter [Navarro] and I have advocated (of course we were labeled right-wing kooks) in the Washington Times is still a very balanced approach: jab the elders and the ones at high risk. "
That's some pretty jaw-dropping information flowing there, at least right up to a sentence-ending non-sequitors about his balanced approach to the "jab."
To wit: "We're observing" "a scripted response" (some call it living through hell) "pioneered" (happy word) in "multiple war games" (public health is no longer even a pretext) funded by the cabal (his wife's influencers) in which he, himself, participated! Today, of course, he's playing opposition leader against this "scripted response." Was that part of the war games, too?
I should note that Malone forgot to mention a key participant, one he isn't usually loathe to talk about. In fact, it's the key participant, according to Robert Kennedy Jr., author of The Real Anthony Fauci. (Dr. Malone appears in the book's list of acknowledgements.).
In November 2021, Kennedy described the same sequence of events this way:
When I researched my book what I learned was that this [2019 pandemic simulation] event, Event 201, was not a one-time occurrence. We found 20 separate pandemic simulations beginning in 2000. One thing they had in common -- most of them Bill Gates was involved in, Tony Fauci was involved in -- but every one of them the CIA was involved in. The CIA wrote the script, high-level CIA officials participated in every one of those pandemic simulations.
And they involved hundreds of thousands of people. They were conducted secretly. They used frontline workers, they were training police, and hospital systems and utilities in Europe, in Italy, in Germany, in Canada, in Australia, all at the same time, to do a response to a pandemic, but it was not a public health response. It was a response to use the pandemic for something else.
So they practiced again and again and again: How to use the pandemic as a pretext for imposing totalitarian controls and for obliterating liberal democracy across the planet.'
Robert Malone talks about a lot of things, but I have never heard him open up about anything like this. Something I learned along the way is to be skeptical about "defectors" who don't tell you anything you don't already know about the inner workings of the enemy. Now, it's possible Malone completely missed the CIA presence Kennedy has identified as a constant, and that the pandemic planning "for obliterating liberal democracy across the planet" went over his head. But the omission is something worth noting.
I think it’s fair to question ALL of Malone’s motives. The red flags were shot out of a cannon when he initiated a lawsuit against Peter & Ginger Breggin! Give me a possible motive for that other than arrogance & thin skinned. I do not see him as a team player against big gov & big pharma, a battle we must win!
Scientists arguing over who contributed more to mRNA vaccines is like marine architects fighting over who contributed more to the Titanic design. I think they all still don’t quite get it. They think ultimately there is a ‘there’ there.
Excellent and intrepid call for answers. I really appreciate this. Thank you, Dr. Alexander. It is important for all participants in the health freedom movement to hold to a high standard. No exceptions.
At another site a poster pointed out that Dr. Malone has not chosen to sue any portion of the Covid Pandemic machine. This really hit me. If he wanted to sue somebody, why not sue those who refuse to set a threshold for injury and death by these jabs? Instead, he sues other activists in the health freedom efforts? Not good. Not good.
And your list helps to put this in further perspective. Thank you.
I don't buy this political post especially since Paul seems hell bent on attacking Malone with vituperative language and accusations. We know Wikipedia erased Malone's name as part of the govt assault on medical researchers and practitioners who questioned the Covid narrative and this post seems to reflect the same. This Kati person sounds like she has accepted the censorship ongoing. Reading Malone's quoted comment does not read as a threat to her but more like a warning that promoting these mRNA drugs will not bode well for anyone. In reading his posts I find his language very low key and seems to have a spiritual lean to them--quite the opposite of Paul's hyperbole with anything that he does not like.
So am quite skeptical of this whole argument
I am finding the infighting between our covid heroes tiring and get the sense the adult in the room, must step in and ask all,parties to find a middle ground and stop wasting their time. It serves no purpose other than to divide us. I am not a proponent of that, and think most of us who have questioned the safety of covid vaxxes, the origins of sars cov2, lockdowns, masks, school closures, business closures, working from home, social distancing, track and trace, PCR tests, would like to continue our efforts towards sanity.
I was convinced not to take the shot by Malone’s appearance on the Dark Horse podcast in June 2021. Not sure what more he was supposed to do at that point in time. No one knew him and he had no platform.
I’ve seen multiple videos where Malone and Vanden Bossche appear together. There didn’t seem to be any animosity.
I think this article deals clearly with Malone’s contribution to MRNA:
https://open.substack.com/pub/doyourownresearch/p/did-dr-robert-malone-really-invent?utm_source=direct&r=pcgsk&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
I’m just a regular guy trying to figure all this out. I have to decide who’s credible based on the information in front of me. At this point, Malone is more credible.
Going forward I’m going to focus on sources that provide sound, scientific basis for opposition to the medical driven tyranny. Bomb throwers and fabulists are a waste of time and energy. As this substack is becoming more unhinged, I think I’ll move on.
McCullough has a Substack too. He hasn't raised any concerns regarding this. He's a freedom warrior and if something were wrong, he would be the first to speak out! Maybe you should talk to him regarding your concerns. He may know since he seems very close with Malone.
Dr. Malone has said that he thought his colleagues had fixed the issues he had noted with the MRNA use in vaccines. That trust in his peers is why he actually took the vaccine so he could travel. I believe he also says that his second shot left him injured.
When Dr. Malone is compared to Katalin Kariko I trust Dr. Malone. She is still the pomoter and ambassador of the failed mRNA vaccine.
When the cries for TRUTH become louder, the RAGE will appear in those trying to SUFFOCATE IT. 💚🐝
I've been patient with you throughout you support of criminal Trump, and now with your attacks on Malone, and the decision you are causing in the movement, I have to unsubscribe from you. You are not a trustworthy source for information,
Why are any of us falling for the oldest globalist game in the book: get the advocates for freedom / truth / health to turn on each other, discredit each other, and take each other out at the knees??? tsf.
“None of your threats to pull donor money, shove it! Up yours! You should not have ______”
This rhetoric is not professional nor helpful to your credibility.
A reader commented last week asking you, good doctor, to tone down your hyperbole & vitriol. NOT your passion, but your expression of it. Reader has a valid point that sharing your writings with our less informed contacts won’t attract them as we’d like. You give updates of News & information but it can be drowned out with over-the-top word slinging.