If this same data came out of China (or Russia, or India, or wherever), most people would say they don't trust it. That is because it is a fact that even "official government data" absolutely CAN be inaccurate. So given that this data from Sweden contradicts the data from almost all other highly mRNA vaccinated countries (where noteworth…
If this same data came out of China (or Russia, or India, or wherever), most people would say they don't trust it. That is because it is a fact that even "official government data" absolutely CAN be inaccurate. So given that this data from Sweden contradicts the data from almost all other highly mRNA vaccinated countries (where noteworthy excess post-vaccine deaths are being seen), and also contradicts Pfizer and Moderna's own gold-standard clinical trial mortality data, please tell me why I should trust it just because it comes from Sweden instead of China/Russia/India- how is that "scientific"? For instance, the US CDC's 2021 death data was finally "corrected" just 5 months ago https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db456.pdf, reflecting an undercount of at least 5% of deaths in the initial report (amounting to >100,000 omitted deaths), so why should I assume that Sweden's data are any more trustworthy? If anything, Sweden's data are under much LESS scrutiny than US data. Anyhow, Sweden's data, even if you assume it's trustworthy, isn't as necessarily as rosy as suggested: https://twitter.com/EthicalSkeptic/status/1627415944443187201.
If this same data came out of China (or Russia, or India, or wherever), most people would say they don't trust it. That is because it is a fact that even "official government data" absolutely CAN be inaccurate. So given that this data from Sweden contradicts the data from almost all other highly mRNA vaccinated countries (where noteworthy excess post-vaccine deaths are being seen), and also contradicts Pfizer and Moderna's own gold-standard clinical trial mortality data, please tell me why I should trust it just because it comes from Sweden instead of China/Russia/India- how is that "scientific"? For instance, the US CDC's 2021 death data was finally "corrected" just 5 months ago https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db456.pdf, reflecting an undercount of at least 5% of deaths in the initial report (amounting to >100,000 omitted deaths), so why should I assume that Sweden's data are any more trustworthy? If anything, Sweden's data are under much LESS scrutiny than US data. Anyhow, Sweden's data, even if you assume it's trustworthy, isn't as necessarily as rosy as suggested: https://twitter.com/EthicalSkeptic/status/1627415944443187201.