Young women, girls under 16-18, pregnant, unmarried, welfare, & dropped out of high-school, then it's GAME OVER! Near IMPOSSIBLE to regain footing; education is critical; then hooked on the welfare
Young women, girls under 16-18, pregnant, unmarried, welfare, & dropped out of high-school, then it's GAME OVER! Near IMPOSSIBLE to regain footing; education is critical; then hooked on the welfare
juice rest of her life especially if baby daddy is AWOL (white or black); kind of like the medical doctors & scientists now hooked on the FREE donor money juice, can't get off the welfare FREE money
Dr. Paul, I worked as a DMH Case Manager for almost 20 years. I worked with many families and single mothers receiving welfare " benefits". I learned very quickly that the system is a trap and benefits no one. if a women accepts welfare the father cannot be involved and certainly cannot be living with and supporting the women and baby. It's one of the rules that must be followed in order to receive financial support from the state. By designed the welfare system supports irresponsible parental behavior. It's possible this wasn't intentionally done but there is no denying what it produces. The welfare programs in an attempt to curtail abuse of the programs don't want to be paying mothers who have father's living with them presumably providing support. The idea of welfare as a safety net though well intended almost always produces lethargy in the individual because in order to receive the "benefit" you must continuously demonstrate a "need" and to demonstrate a "need" you just have to do " nothing".
The welfare system is a trap, no different from being hooked on alcohol or heroin. People become addicted to the easy money.
Girls should be focused on completing their education at that age. Boys are an unnecessary distraction. The time to be interested in boys is later. Of course, the situation is complicated by the fact that in the US the parents are encouraged to talk with their kids at three years of age about gender transitioning and parents may be relieved if the girl shows signs of being a normal heterosexual. Nonetheless, girls in the US should be grateful that they don't live in Afghanistan where they would not be permitted to get an education. The role model for girls in the US, other than those who have gender transitioned, appears to be increasingly likely to be Aisha, whose relationship with the historical figure regarded by growing numbers of Americans as their Prophet was reportedly consummated when Aisha was just nine years old. Americans can thank Lindsey Graham, John McCain, GW Bush and others who facilitated the large scale islamic colonization of the US for this. Strangely, none of these degenerate social trends that afflict the US seem to be a problem in Russia.
Dr. Paul, I worked as a DMH Case Manager for almost 20 years. I worked with many families and single mothers receiving welfare " benefits". I learned very quickly that the system is a trap and benefits no one. if a women accepts welfare the father cannot be involved and certainly cannot be living with and supporting the women and baby. It's one of the rules that must be followed in order to receive financial support from the state. By designed the welfare system supports irresponsible parental behavior. It's possible this wasn't intentionally done but there is no denying what it produces. The welfare programs in an attempt to curtail abuse of the programs don't want to be paying mothers who have father's living with them presumably providing support. The idea of welfare as a safety net though well intended almost always produces lethargy in the individual because in order to receive the "benefit" you must continuously demonstrate a "need" and to demonstrate a "need" you just have to do " nothing".
The welfare system is a trap, no different from being hooked on alcohol or heroin. People become addicted to the easy money.
https://rumble.com/v4nw7q6-how-can-you-look-into-the-eyes-of-a-pregnant-woman-and-tell-her-that-mrna-i.html
Roger Hodkinson says it. Hang these bastards & hang ‘em high!
The truth!
Girls should be focused on completing their education at that age. Boys are an unnecessary distraction. The time to be interested in boys is later. Of course, the situation is complicated by the fact that in the US the parents are encouraged to talk with their kids at three years of age about gender transitioning and parents may be relieved if the girl shows signs of being a normal heterosexual. Nonetheless, girls in the US should be grateful that they don't live in Afghanistan where they would not be permitted to get an education. The role model for girls in the US, other than those who have gender transitioned, appears to be increasingly likely to be Aisha, whose relationship with the historical figure regarded by growing numbers of Americans as their Prophet was reportedly consummated when Aisha was just nine years old. Americans can thank Lindsey Graham, John McCain, GW Bush and others who facilitated the large scale islamic colonization of the US for this. Strangely, none of these degenerate social trends that afflict the US seem to be a problem in Russia.