Bobby knows the climate hoax get rich off of ruining us game. He wants smart change that actually works not carbon credits and destroying our food system to eat Bill Gates’s bugs.
Bobby knows the climate hoax get rich off of ruining us game. He wants smart change that actually works not carbon credits and destroying our food system to eat Bill Gates’s bugs.
People aren't understanding the implications of Kennedy's climate fanaticism, which is real. It doesn't matter at all that he believes the climate agenda is being used by those who want to impose totalitarian government; the very fact that he supports this pseudoscience is a dangerous tell.
What would President Kennedy do when he's in the White House and suddenly several major scientific journals come out and tell us that we're at a dangerous tipping point and we need immediate action, akin to lockdowns, to save the very planet? This man-- who is so keen to notice the pseudoscience in the medical journals-- is completely blind to the pseudoscience in the climate literature. What's wrong with this picture?
I don’t agree with your assertion that he believes in pseudoscience of environmental issues. The climate issue is not an all in or nothing is wrong (while certain groups continue to destroy our planet making big profits). Bobby knows the tricks and games. I think he would support sensible solutions, not crazy ones nor pretend everything is ok.
I never said he believes in the pseudoscience of environmental issues; most of his environmental stances are spot-on, as is his stance on vaccines.
The ones destroying the planet are the ones engaged in deforestation, overfishing, huge mono-cultures of palm oil plants, etc., and spewing toxins into our air and water and bodies, etc. But CO2 isn't a pollutant by any measurement: it's necessary for life. And, it's doing virtually nothing to our atmosphere or our planet.
The question everyone is ignoring is, why does a man who gets so much right get the climate issue completely and utterly wrong, and refuses to change? People tell me he's changed but the only evidence they give is that he says that the climate issue is being used by the Davos crowd to further their agenda, not that the issue is a bogus one.
If every scientific journal on the planet tells one that catastrophic CO2 tipping points are here and drastic action is urgently needed, then what's a "sensible solution"? That's a slippery road.
I think this twitter video explains what I believe the overall plan is: the next great emergency will be climate catastrophe requiring necessary measures. No doubt all of these necessary measures can be framed as nudging free market participants toward energy transition as part of the 'invisible hand' of the marketplace. It all fits in with Kennedy's promotion of free market solutions ....
I don't think they want to allow Trump to be on a Republican ticket either. Heand RFK Jr are the two most popular politicians in thecountry. If they both get sidelined they should definitely run third party on aunity ticket with Trump in the top spot. They'd win.
While RFKJr. Seems to be a nice person and a great lawyer fighting big Pharma he is on the opposite side of the issues Republicans are firm about. He’s anti 2a. He’s pro abortion. Pro climate change hoax. He would do a nice job in Trumps Cabinet eliminating the health industries.
True to a substantial extent. He seems to have moderated on 2A and climate and abortion is now a matter for the states. He would do a great job in getting extra votes for Trump that would outweigh those of the ideological purists Trump would lose.
Bobby knows the climate hoax get rich off of ruining us game. He wants smart change that actually works not carbon credits and destroying our food system to eat Bill Gates’s bugs.
People aren't understanding the implications of Kennedy's climate fanaticism, which is real. It doesn't matter at all that he believes the climate agenda is being used by those who want to impose totalitarian government; the very fact that he supports this pseudoscience is a dangerous tell.
What would President Kennedy do when he's in the White House and suddenly several major scientific journals come out and tell us that we're at a dangerous tipping point and we need immediate action, akin to lockdowns, to save the very planet? This man-- who is so keen to notice the pseudoscience in the medical journals-- is completely blind to the pseudoscience in the climate literature. What's wrong with this picture?
I don’t agree with your assertion that he believes in pseudoscience of environmental issues. The climate issue is not an all in or nothing is wrong (while certain groups continue to destroy our planet making big profits). Bobby knows the tricks and games. I think he would support sensible solutions, not crazy ones nor pretend everything is ok.
I never said he believes in the pseudoscience of environmental issues; most of his environmental stances are spot-on, as is his stance on vaccines.
The ones destroying the planet are the ones engaged in deforestation, overfishing, huge mono-cultures of palm oil plants, etc., and spewing toxins into our air and water and bodies, etc. But CO2 isn't a pollutant by any measurement: it's necessary for life. And, it's doing virtually nothing to our atmosphere or our planet.
The question everyone is ignoring is, why does a man who gets so much right get the climate issue completely and utterly wrong, and refuses to change? People tell me he's changed but the only evidence they give is that he says that the climate issue is being used by the Davos crowd to further their agenda, not that the issue is a bogus one.
If every scientific journal on the planet tells one that catastrophic CO2 tipping points are here and drastic action is urgently needed, then what's a "sensible solution"? That's a slippery road.
You make sense and I see your point. Will have to explore this more closely. Thank you for your comment.
https://twitter.com/JD71723577/status/1675170559322144768
I think this twitter video explains what I believe the overall plan is: the next great emergency will be climate catastrophe requiring necessary measures. No doubt all of these necessary measures can be framed as nudging free market participants toward energy transition as part of the 'invisible hand' of the marketplace. It all fits in with Kennedy's promotion of free market solutions ....
Bugs if you're lucky, else it's Billy Boy's shit to fake food, yum yum.
If Trump runs with a MAGA conservative for VP then Biden or another Democrat will win and Trump will fade into history.
Trump isn’t going to fade out anywhere. I don’t think the RNC would even allow a Democrat to be on a Republican ticket.
I don't think they want to allow Trump to be on a Republican ticket either. Heand RFK Jr are the two most popular politicians in thecountry. If they both get sidelined they should definitely run third party on aunity ticket with Trump in the top spot. They'd win.
While RFKJr. Seems to be a nice person and a great lawyer fighting big Pharma he is on the opposite side of the issues Republicans are firm about. He’s anti 2a. He’s pro abortion. Pro climate change hoax. He would do a nice job in Trumps Cabinet eliminating the health industries.
True to a substantial extent. He seems to have moderated on 2A and climate and abortion is now a matter for the states. He would do a great job in getting extra votes for Trump that would outweigh those of the ideological purists Trump would lose.
Trump doesn’t need RFK Jr. To get him votes. Trump is winning by a landslide.
That's what I thought last time too.
I don't know about that.
Trump won 80% of the vote 2020. The Fake news polls keep lying, pretending biden is doing well. He is Not.