No that is not correct, I think. I looked at the study, the mice were injected with spike proteins. Are those the uridine natural spike proteins or the artificial pseudouridine spikes?
Thanks for pointing that out. It's important to know. If you find out, please share. Do you think it's probable that one would be markedly less pathogenic than the other, as the jab advocates like to suggest?
Nobody was jabbed in this research.
All this research tells you about is what happens to people who catch covid and who have never been jabbed.
No that is not correct, I think. I looked at the study, the mice were injected with spike proteins. Are those the uridine natural spike proteins or the artificial pseudouridine spikes?
Thanks for pointing that out. It's important to know. If you find out, please share. Do you think it's probable that one would be markedly less pathogenic than the other, as the jab advocates like to suggest?
It is my understanding that they used the pseudouridine because it:
тАЬIt is demonstrated that ╬и can enhance RNA stability and, in the meantime, decrease anti-RNA immune response (Karik├│ et al., 2008)тАЭ
Beyond this, are there studies that show the safety of using pseudouridine long them. I didnтАЩt see any.
The Critical Contribution of Pseudouridine to mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2021.789427/full
Thanks for this.