'FDA "Approval" for Covid-19 Vaccines Was Fake - based non-investigational use of a non-experimental unapproved substance (a poison) Discussion with Katherine Watt'; Sasha & Watt are 100% correct yet

let me add some more meat: i)no clinical trial today exists showing that the vaccine reduce hospitalization/death ii)relative risk, not absolute risk reduction used to fool you of benefit iii)stopped

early for benefit as was done is a red flag as could have stopped at a random high of benefit and had it (study) continued to sample size it would have shown no benefit iv)3000 participants data removed by Pfizer from calculations and our best-case worst-case remodelling shows the relative risk reduction would have fallen from 95% to 20%, not even the 50% agreed threshold v)short duration to properly assess benefit or harms vi) small number of outcome events e.g. 170 in Pfizer study is massive risk of biased estimates of effect and actually breaks randomization vii)serious concerns with the reported randomization sequence, the concealment of the sequence (allocation concealment) viii)improper blinding of adjudicator of outcomes etc. thus sub-optimal methods ix)use of improper patient-important outcomes e.g. use of proxy sub-optimal ‘antibody levels etc.’ x)short duration of follow-up to detect any meaningful differences or effect xi)use of immuno-bridging as a means to assess immune response which is pure junk science and methods xii) improper statistical methods to adjust/control for both ‘known’ and ‘unknown’ confounders (competing distorting explanations) xiii)giving the placebo group the vaccine which doomed the study (in short, we have no credible comparative effectiveness research available)

I write as someone trained in evidence based medicine and research methods; excellent work as usual by Watts and Latypova

FDA "Approval" for Covid-19 Vaccines Was Fake - based non-investigational use of a non-experimental unapproved substance (a poison)

‘Video recording from zoom on November 7:

Link to video on Rumble

Link to video on Bitchute

I wrote about this topic here, and we are continuing to compile the research on this issue. As we knew before, the “clinical trials” were a sham and the BLA approval from the FDA is also a sham. We have been able to piece together a more solid evidence from changes to pharmaceutical and other relevant law, and put together a timeline that demonstrates that Poison-19 is a “non-investigational, unapproved” product, aka an illicit drug, poison or weapon trafficked across state lines and internationally by the DOD lead government-pharma cartel.

Due Diligence and Art is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Pharma companies started on a presumably proper BLA pathway by opening Investigational New Drug applications (exemption for investigational clinical trial use of experimental biologics) in April 2020, then, by October 2020 they switched to the EUA Countermeasures pathway. The EUA pathway is “non investigational”, i.e. no clinical trials are possible for it in compliance with FDA regulations of clinical research.

Brook Jackson observed and documented fraud in Pfizer trials because all of it was fraud. The FDA, pharmas and DOJ were all in on it and DOJ declined to prosecute, then Judge Truncale dismissed the case finding that knowledge of fraud, while not disputed, was immaterial to the FDA decision to approve. That’s correct. Fraud was the essential part of this campaign to intentionally deploy this poisonous, cell transfecting, immune system destroying substance on millions of people - getting “access” to millions of subjects in an illegal medical experiment without consent. The criminals behind this - USG/DOD/FDA/Pharmas knew they will kill and injure millions of people world wide and did not care at all. They planned and prepared for it.

More detailed summaries of this will be coming shortly.’