People are quick to forget that the WHO/UN/WEF are busy positioning themselves to marry the climate change narrative to the public health narrative. It’s called having control of the whole kitten caboodle.
As evidence of the “intent” behind this marriage of convenience one need look no further than the following, which appeared in the Lancet:
And if you need further confirmation of where this is all headed....have a look at what Janes Madeira of the AMA has to say on the subject....he was hired @2011 as the CEO of the AMA and clearly has been leading that organization to embrace the climate change/public health union.
that's the beauty of this. And of course, all of this is really done to continue to elevate and support physicians. We'll have other crisis. We have an emerging climate crisis, which is really important and probably going to be hugely impactful. We'll be paying great attention to that. Again, our arcs are agnostic to the environment. They can shift to the environment if the climate change impacts, for example, chronic disease, which it will, we will have that arc incorporate the consideration of climate disease in that arc. So I think we're really well-positioned for whatever comes at us with our strategic framework.”
Best to listen to the whole thing to understand that health will soon encompass whatever the WHO chooses to define as the domain of public health....”climate disease.”
Do you suppose they will consider gun violence as a public health issue that requires global action?
Make no mistake....climate change narrative goes hand in hand with the public health narrative they WANT and will ENSURE evolves from the COVID plandemic.
Psst...Go see what Madara was doing before he became head of the AMA. Private equity investing.
The other thing people need to understand is the social impact markets that will accompany the merger of healthcare/climate change whereby human affairs (with the aid of CBDC that allows tracking and tracing from cradle to grave) are dictated by the new financial system and social impact markets and pay for success programs, designed to hand our governance over to the technocrats. After all, they own the machines and the means that they want us entirely dependent upon. But hey, don’t worry they’ll remake the education system in the process so they can train us for their gig economy.
IT IS ALL CONNECTED....and if Kennedy, Malone, Kirsch, Nass or any of the others don’t want you talk in depth about social impact markets and the planned intersection of public health and climate change then it is because they either don’t have a good enough handle on the bigger agenda (unlikely since the process to be fighting the Davos manifest) or they have some interests in fighting only part of the agenda.
And incidentally, they seem to be focused on the vaccine and as of late we also should note they seem to be leaving a lot of room for the off ramp that consists of saying the affair was a colossal bungle by bureaucrats due to capture and corruption.
Yeah, don’t think so. To me that translates to certain MFM individuals wanting us to trust them without verifying. I’ll pass.
I feel like I am shouting into the wind most days.
Are you the Sandra that Celia Farber latched onto the clip of Alison McDowell to say there are some who are overdosing on red pills?
That whole row was depressing. Felt like Celia Farber was just wanting everyone to fawn over RFK, Jr. And then there is Tessa Lena doing the same dance.
Yes, I'm the one who committed wrong think by expressing concerns about RFK Jr. and posting a short clip of Allison's where she made some extremely important points about the first chapter of his book. I was reprimanded for not joining the group think/hopium bandwagon and for not accepting him as our savior. It was truly shocking!! I've never seen anything like that before--all of the sudden a number of substacks flipped from being places for sharing opinions without drama, to full blown propaganda outlets for political campaigns. I'm not familiar with Tessa Lena doing the same (I think I recently became a free subscriber to her substack and then there was a strange post questioning whether the person you support is with the CIA)
I saw that too. Strange. I think the reference was that whoever “Margie” is sometimes comes up as a different name. I was saying she had a right to ask questions without being vilified. Tessa was defending Malone and Nass. And it was over the top with her suggesting that anyone asking questions is doing damage to the “unity” of the MFM. I believe there are some definite legitimate questions that need answering. And I am not CUA. Lol. Tereza ended up quoting me in her substack using my response to Tessa. Celia banned me from her substack for defending Alison. And then let me back on—although I said I’d pass. CosmoAgent may have asked her to do that. But I don’t want to be part of groupthink so that is a hard pass for me.
Tereza Caraggio had a good post yesterday, where she posted a video and read some of her comments to Tessa Lena--she made a lot of good points in it, basically saying that given all that hangs in the balance, we should not prioritize false unity in the MFM over asking serious questions. Truth be told, I don't know how anyone could support Malone. It truly seems like the MFM is being sabotaged from within (Diana West had a good post on that). As for Celia, I can't say I'm shocked at her banning you. She also apparently banned a guy named "Allen," who I don't know, except for reading some of his comments which are excellent and make valid points. After taking the time to respond to Celia's insanity (e.g. those who question RFK are deceived, working for someone or full of despair) and never getting a response, I realized that nobody over there was actually interested in a rational discussion of serious issues. It was just a massive group think operation. And fwiw, I'm actually a clinical psychologist, and I've never seen that amount of gaslighting, manipulation, deception and outright dishonesty--it was really shocking. So, obviously, I never went back.
NOT a fraud! Unfortunately, most of the people crying “fraud” have no real understanding of the climate beyond “Hey, it’s raining today!” or “summer always follows spring”. Urbanites who think carrots and milk come from the grocery store.
The nursery industry is experiencing turmoil and upheaval because of many issues, including the growing disparity of seasonal changes in the southern/southeastern areas of the country and the more northerly areas. Inventories are changing to reflect the need for more drought-hardy plant species and varieties. Is the entire nursery industry populated with climate cultists? Animal and plant habitats are shifting, driving more vulnerable species either into shrinking habitats or closer to human-dominated landscapes. That is driving up both extinction risks and conflict with humans simultaneously. Are wild plants and animals also climate change “cultusts”?
One question of mine which NO climate denier has yet been able to answer is this: how is it possible that over eight billion medium-sized mammals all simultaneously. , as a group, farming, mining, eating, pooping, breathing, creating artificial chemicals and dumping them freely into the environment, ranching, hunting, logging, fishing, covering the ground with concrete and asphalt, burning coal and gas and wood, damming rivers, replacing native habitats with exotic controlled landscapes, and doing hundreds of other things all across the globe, are NOT influencing the climate in any way? HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE?? I’d love to hear the answer. Especially as it’s established that the actions of all other species, from termites to redwoods, DOES collectively, and over time, influence geochemistry and therefore climate. But human activity is somehow exempt from consequences. I wonder how THAT works??
Hm. Your answer is, in effect, “defer to chosen authority” in response to my request that you reason things out. It’s like Galileo attempting to talk with the church. Who was correct on THAT one? Or are you a flat-earther, too?
Because in order to deny that humans have any affect on climate, you’d have to say that every aspect of the sciences of biochemistry, geochemistry and ecology
as well as climate is completely fake and wrong. That’s a pretty big claim. Or that the Koch Bros and a number of incredibly influential
interests whose wealth and power come from the fossil fuel industry are NOT attempting to influence public opinion against climate change. That’s a pretty tall
claim, as well. Are you saying that the people who want to keep you captive to their profit machines, couldn’t be lying to you the way the pharmaceutical industry is lying to the public about the jab? Since when do we accept whatever narrative Big Anything (including Big Religion) shoves down our throats, as truth?
It was the metabolic action of simple one-celled stromatolites (a few of which still live in very salty Australian ocean bays) that, over millions of years, created earth’s oxygen-rich atmosphere. Yet the quadrillion quadrillion living, metabolizing human cells on the earth right now are completely free of environmental effects? As are all of our other activities, which go beyond any activity engaged in by any other organism? They all count but we don’t.l? Either answer my question of how that can be- give me a reason, not a blind appeal to authority -or admit that I have a point.
You're the one demanding we obey the "experts" not me. The same people who locked down the country and much of the planet want to impose a similar draconian action to "save the planet."
Let me be blunt, they lied then and they are lying now. That's not any appeal; that's common sense.
Of course there is "climate change" from various changes in the environment, but it isn't the fake facts being pushed by activists. The real question should be... Why are the governments and corporations engineering/causing so many of these changes while simultaneously blaming the ill effects on the wrong people? They want to punish humans for climate change, yet corporations and governments are the greatest threat to the environment! Who has been mining and dumping and putting things in the air for profit? Humans living sustainably were usurped by the evolution of corporate and governmental conjoining in a devastation of the environment by greed... Corporations trash the environment, the government comes in after and makes them pay a small fine that is a mere pittance of the profits and repeat cycle with no real accountability! Hide the perpetrators by blaming the victims! I don't know anyone who says that the environment hasn't been changed. The problem is who is actually doing it, how they continue to get away with it, and how they try to blame it on everyone but the real culprits.
Do you follow or have you reached out to real climate scientists? Real people who measure glaciers and snow melt ? The earth is billions of years old and we are but a mere spec for our hopefully 100 years here. Climate ebbs and flows. Cow farts are not destroying our atmosphere. Eating bugs is not the answer. Go back to our roots and eat clean meat from regenerative farms. Chronic disease relatively new - vaccines, environmental toxins, chem trails. God knew what he was doing. Silent Spring? I enjoy multitude of birds calling daily and revel in it. There is no climate crisis. Doesn’t mean I don’t keep trash out of the ocean and keep waste of any kind to a minimum; food especially. I don’t buy ziplock bags and avoid plastic of any kind. I even make my own toothpaste! Peace and love
Hear, hear! Once again, where are the critical thinkers? Or even the humans with common sense? Is that faculty yet another casualty of the sixth mass extinction?
Climate ‘Crisis’ is much larger fraud than Covid
It IS part of the COVID fraud/chronicles....
People are quick to forget that the WHO/UN/WEF are busy positioning themselves to marry the climate change narrative to the public health narrative. It’s called having control of the whole kitten caboodle.
As evidence of the “intent” behind this marriage of convenience one need look no further than the following, which appeared in the Lancet:
https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/nih-s-climate-health-initiative-tackles-global-health-effects-associated-changing-climate
And if you need further confirmation of where this is all headed....have a look at what Janes Madeira of the AMA has to say on the subject....he was hired @2011 as the CEO of the AMA and clearly has been leading that organization to embrace the climate change/public health union.
https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/sustainability/james-madara-md-future-medicine-2022
In Madara’s words (pay close attention people):
“So
that's the beauty of this. And of course, all of this is really done to continue to elevate and support physicians. We'll have other crisis. We have an emerging climate crisis, which is really important and probably going to be hugely impactful. We'll be paying great attention to that. Again, our arcs are agnostic to the environment. They can shift to the environment if the climate change impacts, for example, chronic disease, which it will, we will have that arc incorporate the consideration of climate disease in that arc. So I think we're really well-positioned for whatever comes at us with our strategic framework.”
Best to listen to the whole thing to understand that health will soon encompass whatever the WHO chooses to define as the domain of public health....”climate disease.”
Do you suppose they will consider gun violence as a public health issue that requires global action?
Make no mistake....climate change narrative goes hand in hand with the public health narrative they WANT and will ENSURE evolves from the COVID plandemic.
Psst...Go see what Madara was doing before he became head of the AMA. Private equity investing.
The other thing people need to understand is the social impact markets that will accompany the merger of healthcare/climate change whereby human affairs (with the aid of CBDC that allows tracking and tracing from cradle to grave) are dictated by the new financial system and social impact markets and pay for success programs, designed to hand our governance over to the technocrats. After all, they own the machines and the means that they want us entirely dependent upon. But hey, don’t worry they’ll remake the education system in the process so they can train us for their gig economy.
IT IS ALL CONNECTED....and if Kennedy, Malone, Kirsch, Nass or any of the others don’t want you talk in depth about social impact markets and the planned intersection of public health and climate change then it is because they either don’t have a good enough handle on the bigger agenda (unlikely since the process to be fighting the Davos manifest) or they have some interests in fighting only part of the agenda.
And incidentally, they seem to be focused on the vaccine and as of late we also should note they seem to be leaving a lot of room for the off ramp that consists of saying the affair was a colossal bungle by bureaucrats due to capture and corruption.
Yeah, don’t think so. To me that translates to certain MFM individuals wanting us to trust them without verifying. I’ll pass.
Thank you for taking the time to post such a thorough comment--I completely agree with you on all of this!
I feel like I am shouting into the wind most days.
Are you the Sandra that Celia Farber latched onto the clip of Alison McDowell to say there are some who are overdosing on red pills?
That whole row was depressing. Felt like Celia Farber was just wanting everyone to fawn over RFK, Jr. And then there is Tessa Lena doing the same dance.
Yes, I'm the one who committed wrong think by expressing concerns about RFK Jr. and posting a short clip of Allison's where she made some extremely important points about the first chapter of his book. I was reprimanded for not joining the group think/hopium bandwagon and for not accepting him as our savior. It was truly shocking!! I've never seen anything like that before--all of the sudden a number of substacks flipped from being places for sharing opinions without drama, to full blown propaganda outlets for political campaigns. I'm not familiar with Tessa Lena doing the same (I think I recently became a free subscriber to her substack and then there was a strange post questioning whether the person you support is with the CIA)
I saw that too. Strange. I think the reference was that whoever “Margie” is sometimes comes up as a different name. I was saying she had a right to ask questions without being vilified. Tessa was defending Malone and Nass. And it was over the top with her suggesting that anyone asking questions is doing damage to the “unity” of the MFM. I believe there are some definite legitimate questions that need answering. And I am not CUA. Lol. Tereza ended up quoting me in her substack using my response to Tessa. Celia banned me from her substack for defending Alison. And then let me back on—although I said I’d pass. CosmoAgent may have asked her to do that. But I don’t want to be part of groupthink so that is a hard pass for me.
Tereza Caraggio had a good post yesterday, where she posted a video and read some of her comments to Tessa Lena--she made a lot of good points in it, basically saying that given all that hangs in the balance, we should not prioritize false unity in the MFM over asking serious questions. Truth be told, I don't know how anyone could support Malone. It truly seems like the MFM is being sabotaged from within (Diana West had a good post on that). As for Celia, I can't say I'm shocked at her banning you. She also apparently banned a guy named "Allen," who I don't know, except for reading some of his comments which are excellent and make valid points. After taking the time to respond to Celia's insanity (e.g. those who question RFK are deceived, working for someone or full of despair) and never getting a response, I realized that nobody over there was actually interested in a rational discussion of serious issues. It was just a massive group think operation. And fwiw, I'm actually a clinical psychologist, and I've never seen that amount of gaslighting, manipulation, deception and outright dishonesty--it was really shocking. So, obviously, I never went back.
The Climate alarmist avoid actual date.
2030
NOT a fraud! Unfortunately, most of the people crying “fraud” have no real understanding of the climate beyond “Hey, it’s raining today!” or “summer always follows spring”. Urbanites who think carrots and milk come from the grocery store.
The nursery industry is experiencing turmoil and upheaval because of many issues, including the growing disparity of seasonal changes in the southern/southeastern areas of the country and the more northerly areas. Inventories are changing to reflect the need for more drought-hardy plant species and varieties. Is the entire nursery industry populated with climate cultists? Animal and plant habitats are shifting, driving more vulnerable species either into shrinking habitats or closer to human-dominated landscapes. That is driving up both extinction risks and conflict with humans simultaneously. Are wild plants and animals also climate change “cultusts”?
One question of mine which NO climate denier has yet been able to answer is this: how is it possible that over eight billion medium-sized mammals all simultaneously. , as a group, farming, mining, eating, pooping, breathing, creating artificial chemicals and dumping them freely into the environment, ranching, hunting, logging, fishing, covering the ground with concrete and asphalt, burning coal and gas and wood, damming rivers, replacing native habitats with exotic controlled landscapes, and doing hundreds of other things all across the globe, are NOT influencing the climate in any way? HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE?? I’d love to hear the answer. Especially as it’s established that the actions of all other species, from termites to redwoods, DOES collectively, and over time, influence geochemistry and therefore climate. But human activity is somehow exempt from consequences. I wonder how THAT works??
Who says any of the weather can be changed or is changed by anything man does?
How do you know what people's poop, piss, etc. has anything to do with climate?
Oh yeah, because you were told so over and over again by the same people who said to take the experimental clot shot.
No thanks.
Hm. Your answer is, in effect, “defer to chosen authority” in response to my request that you reason things out. It’s like Galileo attempting to talk with the church. Who was correct on THAT one? Or are you a flat-earther, too?
Because in order to deny that humans have any affect on climate, you’d have to say that every aspect of the sciences of biochemistry, geochemistry and ecology
as well as climate is completely fake and wrong. That’s a pretty big claim. Or that the Koch Bros and a number of incredibly influential
interests whose wealth and power come from the fossil fuel industry are NOT attempting to influence public opinion against climate change. That’s a pretty tall
claim, as well. Are you saying that the people who want to keep you captive to their profit machines, couldn’t be lying to you the way the pharmaceutical industry is lying to the public about the jab? Since when do we accept whatever narrative Big Anything (including Big Religion) shoves down our throats, as truth?
It was the metabolic action of simple one-celled stromatolites (a few of which still live in very salty Australian ocean bays) that, over millions of years, created earth’s oxygen-rich atmosphere. Yet the quadrillion quadrillion living, metabolizing human cells on the earth right now are completely free of environmental effects? As are all of our other activities, which go beyond any activity engaged in by any other organism? They all count but we don’t.l? Either answer my question of how that can be- give me a reason, not a blind appeal to authority -or admit that I have a point.
You're the one demanding we obey the "experts" not me. The same people who locked down the country and much of the planet want to impose a similar draconian action to "save the planet."
Let me be blunt, they lied then and they are lying now. That's not any appeal; that's common sense.
Of course there is "climate change" from various changes in the environment, but it isn't the fake facts being pushed by activists. The real question should be... Why are the governments and corporations engineering/causing so many of these changes while simultaneously blaming the ill effects on the wrong people? They want to punish humans for climate change, yet corporations and governments are the greatest threat to the environment! Who has been mining and dumping and putting things in the air for profit? Humans living sustainably were usurped by the evolution of corporate and governmental conjoining in a devastation of the environment by greed... Corporations trash the environment, the government comes in after and makes them pay a small fine that is a mere pittance of the profits and repeat cycle with no real accountability! Hide the perpetrators by blaming the victims! I don't know anyone who says that the environment hasn't been changed. The problem is who is actually doing it, how they continue to get away with it, and how they try to blame it on everyone but the real culprits.
Do you follow or have you reached out to real climate scientists? Real people who measure glaciers and snow melt ? The earth is billions of years old and we are but a mere spec for our hopefully 100 years here. Climate ebbs and flows. Cow farts are not destroying our atmosphere. Eating bugs is not the answer. Go back to our roots and eat clean meat from regenerative farms. Chronic disease relatively new - vaccines, environmental toxins, chem trails. God knew what he was doing. Silent Spring? I enjoy multitude of birds calling daily and revel in it. There is no climate crisis. Doesn’t mean I don’t keep trash out of the ocean and keep waste of any kind to a minimum; food especially. I don’t buy ziplock bags and avoid plastic of any kind. I even make my own toothpaste! Peace and love
Hear, hear! Once again, where are the critical thinkers? Or even the humans with common sense? Is that faculty yet another casualty of the sixth mass extinction?
More money to steal and easier to lock down.
Right, but apparently nobody cares.
Viruses mutate and the crisis has to wind down as Farrs Law of epidemiology says that. So climate scam is easier to push and push and push