Breggin said some pretty awful things about Malone based on Malone's friendship with Desmet because he (Breggin) didn't agree with Desmet's theory and read something into it that isn't there, IMO. That was at about the same time Breggin published his book, which makes me wonder if Breggin's ultimate goal was to discredit Desmet and Malon…
Breggin said some pretty awful things about Malone based on Malone's friendship with Desmet because he (Breggin) didn't agree with Desmet's theory and read something into it that isn't there, IMO. That was at about the same time Breggin published his book, which makes me wonder if Breggin's ultimate goal was to discredit Desmet and Malone to draw more attention to his own book and theory which he laid out in his book. The court documents, which can also be found via Merly Nass' substack, make it pretty clear that Malone asked Breggin (nicely) to cease and desist the attacks, which Breggin started in the first place, and when the attacks continued, Malone fired one across the bow with the lawsuit. I might have done the same.
So a 25 million lawsuit is warranted then, because little Bobby Malone can’t be a grown up and move on? Because everyone and everything must revolve around the Malone’s delicate senses?
My gut instinct went “Question every thing, “after Malone did his epoch times production Showcase interview , sorry I can’t remember the title and don’t have a link handy. It was over the top, bummed me out. Grandiose.
Dr. Breggin pointed out Malone's horrendous history. But he failed to mention that Malone wanted to test the Anthrax vaccines on children. Malone is a monster.
Regardless of facts to the contrary, I see you are firmly entrenched as indicated by your tone and writing, I am not going to waste additional time, spent better elsewhere, in further conversation with you about this subject. No hard feelings, we'll just have to agree to disagree.
This was my take as well. I’m addition, I feel that a lawsuit of this magnitude could be seen as bullying (as the dead horse rant suggests) or it could simply
say, “I asked you
nicely, over & over and you ignored me. Stick a fork in it; I’m done. No more Mr. Nice guy.”
Exactly. There's only so much anyone can take before they're done with turning the other cheek. I really don't think any court will award $25M to Malone, but the filing is what it took for Breggin to cease and desist. It's really sad that it had to go that far.
The Breggins haven't "ceased" or "desisted" - they're on fire. A group of us have offered to help them by sharing our research on Malone's history. The Malones have attempted to wipe their record of performance from the web, but many of us had already archived it. They can't hide - Mark, George and others have the receipts. Maybe you can ask them why they're continuing to erase their information from the web, what are they hiding? On the other side, the Breggins have nothing to hide.
We do live in America and according to our Constitution we do have free speech. Breggin in entitled to his own opinion about Malone or anyone else he pleases as do all of us. Saying awful things about someone is not grounds for a defamation lawsuit. Breggin did not in anyway cause financial loss to Malone because of his comments and defamation is when you purposely told lies that you knew were lies in order to destroy someone. Breggin feels his statements about Malone are true. His book had nothing to do with the topic of Desmet's books or interviews. There was no competition because the books covered totally different topics. I do not believe Breggin was reading something into Desmet's theory that was not there. You did not pick up on it nor did you interpret it the way Breggin did but Breggin was not the only person that felt Desmet was off base. Breggin did not hurt Malone financially and Breggin did not knowingly tell lies about Malone. If Malone cannot take the heat then he needs to get out of the kitchen. Malone has a habit of attacking people that challenge him. He had George Webb (an invited journalist) removed from a conference in Atlanta because Webb was prepared to ask Malone about his involvement with DOMANE. Malone also has gone after Dr. Ruby and Stew Peters. I guess he is just going to sue everyone that says a mean thing about him. This appears to be a bullying tactic to stop people from saying things about Malone he doesn't like or to challenge some VERY questionable aspects of his career. You might have done the same??? And you would have lost your case just like Malone will lose his case.
How do you know Breggin didn't hurt Malone financially with the adverse comments he made about him? Neither you or I can say that for certain. If the lawsuit moves forward the evidence will show that.
Early on, Ruby and Peters sided with Breggin - their right - but if they publicly attacked me, I would probably be hostile toward them as well. Psychologically speaking, Malone is probably finding himself on the defensive a lot lately. What we do know for certain is that the adverse comments succeeded into dividing the public into two camps regarding Malone and Breggin, especially on social media. That in itself can have significant financial impact. IMO, if Malone and Breggin both put their egos aside and worked together, they could make a formidable team. Alas, the infighting among the truth warriors is, of course exactly what our enemies want - divide and conquer.
Malone is on video stating that he wasn't making any money, so how exactly did the Breggins cost him $25 million? Have you done ANY research on the Malones? You can't possibly be a researcher. George Webb and Housatonic.Live have the receipts on Malone and his mail order medical degree😂😂the guy says he's a physician but has never seen a patient. He's a bad joke.
And here you are piling on. Would you know if the Breggins, whose attack on Malone came out of nowhere, aren't controlled opposition? I don't have to do deep-dive research into a topic that others, like Dr. Meryl Nass have already completed. All you have to do is read it. But then, it likely won't fit into your paradigm and you'll either not read it, or if you do, you'll disregard it. That's how bias works and it is what it is.
Where's the personal attack? That you're not a researcher? Obviously you're not otherwise you'd know that Robert Malone is a monster who wanted to test Anthrax vaccines on kids. Meryl Nass fought him on that issue. You'd know that if you were a researcher.
The Breggins are honorable and ethical, they would never accept money to divide anyone. Nothing in their history would lead to such a horrible suggestion. Unlike Malone, they never suggested using our children as guinea pigs for big pharma.
I can see this point of view as well. To me though, we need to let this take its course and see how it plays out. So much that we don’t know about this situation.
Breggin said some pretty awful things about Malone based on Malone's friendship with Desmet because he (Breggin) didn't agree with Desmet's theory and read something into it that isn't there, IMO. That was at about the same time Breggin published his book, which makes me wonder if Breggin's ultimate goal was to discredit Desmet and Malone to draw more attention to his own book and theory which he laid out in his book. The court documents, which can also be found via Merly Nass' substack, make it pretty clear that Malone asked Breggin (nicely) to cease and desist the attacks, which Breggin started in the first place, and when the attacks continued, Malone fired one across the bow with the lawsuit. I might have done the same.
So a 25 million lawsuit is warranted then, because little Bobby Malone can’t be a grown up and move on? Because everyone and everything must revolve around the Malone’s delicate senses?
Pray for discernment.
Often!
My gut instinct went “Question every thing, “after Malone did his epoch times production Showcase interview , sorry I can’t remember the title and don’t have a link handy. It was over the top, bummed me out. Grandiose.
The man does have an ego...
Dr. Breggin pointed out Malone's horrendous history. But he failed to mention that Malone wanted to test the Anthrax vaccines on children. Malone is a monster.
Woah, I sense a lot of hate there. Next will come a personal attack on me from you.
Facts aren't hate, you shouldn't confuse them. You know what happens when you ASSume...
Regardless of facts to the contrary, I see you are firmly entrenched as indicated by your tone and writing, I am not going to waste additional time, spent better elsewhere, in further conversation with you about this subject. No hard feelings, we'll just have to agree to disagree.
This was my take as well. I’m addition, I feel that a lawsuit of this magnitude could be seen as bullying (as the dead horse rant suggests) or it could simply
say, “I asked you
nicely, over & over and you ignored me. Stick a fork in it; I’m done. No more Mr. Nice guy.”
Exactly. There's only so much anyone can take before they're done with turning the other cheek. I really don't think any court will award $25M to Malone, but the filing is what it took for Breggin to cease and desist. It's really sad that it had to go that far.
The Breggins haven't "ceased" or "desisted" - they're on fire. A group of us have offered to help them by sharing our research on Malone's history. The Malones have attempted to wipe their record of performance from the web, but many of us had already archived it. They can't hide - Mark, George and others have the receipts. Maybe you can ask them why they're continuing to erase their information from the web, what are they hiding? On the other side, the Breggins have nothing to hide.
*Meryl
We do live in America and according to our Constitution we do have free speech. Breggin in entitled to his own opinion about Malone or anyone else he pleases as do all of us. Saying awful things about someone is not grounds for a defamation lawsuit. Breggin did not in anyway cause financial loss to Malone because of his comments and defamation is when you purposely told lies that you knew were lies in order to destroy someone. Breggin feels his statements about Malone are true. His book had nothing to do with the topic of Desmet's books or interviews. There was no competition because the books covered totally different topics. I do not believe Breggin was reading something into Desmet's theory that was not there. You did not pick up on it nor did you interpret it the way Breggin did but Breggin was not the only person that felt Desmet was off base. Breggin did not hurt Malone financially and Breggin did not knowingly tell lies about Malone. If Malone cannot take the heat then he needs to get out of the kitchen. Malone has a habit of attacking people that challenge him. He had George Webb (an invited journalist) removed from a conference in Atlanta because Webb was prepared to ask Malone about his involvement with DOMANE. Malone also has gone after Dr. Ruby and Stew Peters. I guess he is just going to sue everyone that says a mean thing about him. This appears to be a bullying tactic to stop people from saying things about Malone he doesn't like or to challenge some VERY questionable aspects of his career. You might have done the same??? And you would have lost your case just like Malone will lose his case.
How do you know Breggin didn't hurt Malone financially with the adverse comments he made about him? Neither you or I can say that for certain. If the lawsuit moves forward the evidence will show that.
Early on, Ruby and Peters sided with Breggin - their right - but if they publicly attacked me, I would probably be hostile toward them as well. Psychologically speaking, Malone is probably finding himself on the defensive a lot lately. What we do know for certain is that the adverse comments succeeded into dividing the public into two camps regarding Malone and Breggin, especially on social media. That in itself can have significant financial impact. IMO, if Malone and Breggin both put their egos aside and worked together, they could make a formidable team. Alas, the infighting among the truth warriors is, of course exactly what our enemies want - divide and conquer.
Malone is on video stating that he wasn't making any money, so how exactly did the Breggins cost him $25 million? Have you done ANY research on the Malones? You can't possibly be a researcher. George Webb and Housatonic.Live have the receipts on Malone and his mail order medical degree😂😂the guy says he's a physician but has never seen a patient. He's a bad joke.
And here you are piling on. Would you know if the Breggins, whose attack on Malone came out of nowhere, aren't controlled opposition? I don't have to do deep-dive research into a topic that others, like Dr. Meryl Nass have already completed. All you have to do is read it. But then, it likely won't fit into your paradigm and you'll either not read it, or if you do, you'll disregard it. That's how bias works and it is what it is.
And here's that personal attack..
Where's the personal attack? That you're not a researcher? Obviously you're not otherwise you'd know that Robert Malone is a monster who wanted to test Anthrax vaccines on kids. Meryl Nass fought him on that issue. You'd know that if you were a researcher.
Facts aren't attacks, grow up.
I would not be surprised
if someone didn’t
get to some
of them with a bribe to a divide and conquer.
The Breggins are honorable and ethical, they would never accept money to divide anyone. Nothing in their history would lead to such a horrible suggestion. Unlike Malone, they never suggested using our children as guinea pigs for big pharma.
I can see this point of view as well. To me though, we need to let this take its course and see how it plays out. So much that we don’t know about this situation.