Professor: 'If You Read To Your Kids, You’re ‘Unfairly Disadvantaging’ Others'; do you grasp the INSANITY of WOKE, of leftist liberalism MADNESS; how do we deal with this madness? Solutions? According
to a deranged professor at the University of Warwick in England, parents who read to their kids should be thinking about how they’re “unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children”, by Timpf
This nutcase will make Kamala Harris, will make Rochelle Walensky, will make the Rhinestone cowgirl Frederica Wilson, blush with envy as to the stupidity, I mean, Timpf had to plumb the depth of moron-ity to come up with that drivel…yet drivel as it is, it is dangerous for nutjobs in the society believe this tripe garbage.
Like I give a damn about this view. It so outrages me I will go read to other people’s children now, for this is nonsensical. I will find kids to read to…and oh, if I send my child to a private school to get away from your gang banging homosexual tranny pedophile actions pushing fentanyl you infested freaks, I am the wrong one?
Timpf, up yours! You hear me, up yours! See what Mr. Rogers has to say, well that is what I have to tell you too:
‘In an interview with ABC Radio last week, philosopher and professor Adam Swift said that since “bedtime stories activities . . . do indeed foster and produce . . . [desired] familial relationship goods,” he wouldn’t want to ban them, but that parents who “engage in bedtime-stories activities” should definitely at least feel kinda bad about it sometimes:
“I don’t think parents reading their children bedtime stories should constantly have in their minds the way that they are unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children, but I think they should have that thought occasionally,” he said.
But Swift also added that some other things parents do to give their kids the best education possible — like sending them to “an elite private school” — “cannot be justified” in this way.’
Please consider going from an UNPAID subscriber or follower to a PAID at $5 per month or $30 per year. This can provide me help. If this is not possible at this time, this is ok, please remain a subscriber for FREE and there is no difference between FREE and PAID. No restrictions.
Alternatively, if you wish to give a donation to help, you can at:
Zelle:
sr7283@gmail.com
Or Ko-Fi
Ko-fi.com/drpauleliasalexander
Or to my address at:
150 South 8th Street
Unit 170
Lewiston, New York
14092
You must not wait for another catastrophic crisis (at times manufactured but we are prevented from making our own basic personal decisions or accessing needed drugs and response tools) to catch you off-guard. We must take charge and be prepared today so that we can enjoy peace of mind tomorrow.
Please consider support of a good company Drs. McCullough, Risch, Thorp, myself support (they are our sponsors), The Wellness Company; see the emergency preparation kit (with antibiotics you were denied by doctors, pharmacists, governments during the fraud COVID), first aid kit, travel emergency kit, contagion control kit etc. Please consider the SPIKE SUPPORT (spike protein DETOX dissolving) formula with NATTOKINASE as well as the triple formula (SPIKE SUPPORT, BROMELAIN, CIRCUMIN)
Professors Adam Swift (University of Warwick) and Harry Brighouse (University of Wisconsin-Madison) are working together on developing a “liberal egalitarian theory of the family.” Swift, the ABC article notes, “has been conflicted for some time” about how the “playing field” becomes lopsided — because some parents do more for their children than others.
‘I got interested in this question because I was interested in equality of opportunity,’ he says.
‘I had done some work on social mobility and the evidence is overwhelmingly that the reason why children born to different families have very different chances in life is because of what happens in those families.’
Once he got thinking, Swift could see that the issue stretches well beyond the fact that some families can afford private schooling, nannies, tutors, and houses in good suburbs. Functional family interactions—from going to the cricket to reading bedtime stories—form a largely unseen but palpable fault line between families. The consequence is a gap in social mobility and equality that can last for generations.
So, what to do?
According to Swift, from a purely instrumental position the answer is straightforward.
‘One way philosophers might think about solving the social justice problem would be by simply abolishing the family. If the family is this source of unfairness in society then it looks plausible to think that if we abolished the family there would be a more level playing field.’
Although Swift invokes Plato and his advocacy of the abolition of family, he and Brighouse recognize that they can’t go that far.
Instead, they “sort[ed] out those activities that contribute to unnecessary inequality from those that don’t.” Like, for example, private schooling:
‘Private schooling cannot be justified by appeal to these familial relationship goods,’ he says. ‘It’s just not the case that in order for a family to realise these intimate, loving, authoritative, affectionate, love-based relationships you need to be able to send your child to an elite private school.’
In contrast, reading stories at bedtime, argues Swift, gives rise to acceptable familial relationship goods, even though this also bestows advantage.
“We could prevent elite private schooling without any real hit to healthy family relationships,” Swift says, but doing away with reading to your kids would be “too big a hit at the core of family life.”
Boy, I guess we should all feel … lucky that Swift still allows us that “luxury?”
So, there are two separate realities coexisting in the same space time. I have known this for decades and also a time would come when the frequencies would split apart. That time is now. It will come in stages and phases. The first phase is underway. Those leaving en mass are those who are not able, for whatever reason, to take advantage of the change in the paradigm we have entered. Call it a reverse rapture if you will. How will this happen? War, starvation, but 70% of Americans are double jabbed with the bioweapon. Let's say half of those have set themselves up for myocarditis and cancer... they will all be gone in the next ten years and maybe 50% in the next 5 years.... that is 100 million people just from the biomedical extermination operation.
Not complying with the ongoing extermination Democide might improve your chances of surviving the the Great Leaving. But no guarantee if you are already jabbed multiple times.....
To my jabbed fellows....Huck Finn once said, "You pay your money and you take you choice."
Or as the Templar Knight in Indiana Jones said, "He chose poorly."
Sorry.... I need to stay in a humor mode in the midst of a massive genocide most don't even understand what s going on, But if I were double jabbed + I would be on Bromelian Nattokinase, Lumbrokinase, Curcumin (tumeric) and lutein https://f1000research.com/articles/13-191/v2#referee-response-317253.
And then I would cross me fingers, pray and be the best person you can be.
PS: My book was just published Incurable Us: https://www.amazon.com/Incurable-Me-Research-Clinical-Practice/dp/1510774947/ref=sr_1_1?dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.U5b-Avs9vWDhQLX2SRRC5lqq-pteCLVhhaKZMGTrxFEL2kJsYkAEyb-rVnv3Dt-dcc8uL-NZgNOYws-b7zkV_e_ZMciFZnLtoOOkOf58jIzQyaVdCCFCrY-q5B37H1CavtYSHkMyH2rZSO1vX0TpcwHfDz-uVgIPiiC9KOfWrfU6mq8lrRVD8CXoKDCfhFyuwTsH8cNlt4M5w7PvMHwoEVDbBA4TISC5qXzh0yyfzBY.5YbyWvvDfIU6OGVogXH2uTa_9LQffCNOkvEob1Tt2ag&dib_tag=se&keywords=incurable+us&qid=1726278282&sr=8-1