7 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Barry Varkel's avatar

I never said the she/he duo is antisemitic - I said they're possibly an antisemitism barometer.

I don't know where the duo comes from, whether they had a barmitzvah/batmitzvah. Nor does it matter. Nor do I care.

The whole Jewish gig is tired.

A bunch of niggas trounced the alleged chosen people in the highest court in the world.

That's the joke of the century.

Nigga slaves taking out allegedly cleverer than everyone Jews.

My late dad was Jewish. My mom is a ½ nigga. That makes me ¼ nigga. So I can say nigga.

The duo is nothing special.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

Barry, I wasn't accusing you of saying Bilbo is antisemitic. I mentioned it only because other people assume he is. I can agree "he" is an antisemitism barometer. He (or whatever) and I got of to a rough start but I shrugged off his insults and verbal attacks and forgave him. He is an interesting character. He hates Triump, who he calls a "faux goyim" and I know you

don't like Trump. I agree with you about what South Africa has done. I also agree with you about the narcissistic "we're special" master race bullshit. It wasn't ok when Hitler and the Nazis claimed that the "Aryans" were the "chosen ones" so why should it be ok for other ethno-nationalists to claim they 're the chosen ones?

Expand full comment
Barry Varkel's avatar

Hi ANW,

Thanks for your reply.

Well observed with der Führer and his identical BS thesis.

Here's a link to a piece of artwork that rings so very true:

https://photos.app.goo.gl/v8YEa1AV6fxgEnb36

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

Wow, there's something about that artwork that reminds me of Rushdie's "The Satanic Verses." I can imagine the outrage. The censorship lobby would not like it all.

Expand full comment
Barry Varkel's avatar

I don't think it would be accepted anywhere in the West.

You know what makes me laugh now; cry actually.

Art - whether it's somehting like the Netanyahu raghead-baby-rare-prime-rib gluttony feast artwork; or a feature film like Napoleon; or a Brazilian TV series called "The mechanism", which all get slated by "critics", who say the art - that's art my brother - is not factually correct.

How can you argue with art?

How can you argue with fiction stories or feature films or even poetry?

Is this what the world is now?

Anything that's even a smidgen of left of field, or artistic creation, or licence cannot be controversial - for the sake of art - because all the nitwits need to analyse it, and run it through the mill of their dullard better than AI brains.

Don't worry about so-called "transhumanism" - it's here already.

Or should we just call it what it is - stupid, dull fucks, who have zero creativity and lemmings actually have more independent thought and individual wilfulness.

Don't worry about any of the crap the "alt media" bangs on about - it's done and dusted.

We are living in the black hole of laziness, sloth, envy and wrath.

And it's all de-facto, which is a legal term for: "it is as it is".

CUNTS.

ALL OF THEM.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

Well said Barry. I can picture a caricature right now of Netanyahu after pumping 4 rounds through a bathroom door while his girlfriend or a small child is inside saying "But I thought the girlfriend/child was an Hamas terrorist and therefore I used proportionate force. The killing of the child, the collateral damage, is fully justified. Anyone who says otherwise is a raghead loving Jew hater."

Expand full comment