I believe he is charged with murder, as he should be. In the very first place, she contacted police for a suspected prowler and this jerk acted like it was an imposition! Secondly, they had absolutely no business entering her house and especially pestering her for her identification. If he doesn't spend a hard twenty for his actions, there's no justice!!
I believe he is charged with murder, as he should be. In the very first place, she contacted police for a suspected prowler and this jerk acted like it was an imposition! Secondly, they had absolutely no business entering her house and especially pestering her for her identification. If he doesn't spend a hard twenty for his actions, there's no justice!!
Clive - if she allowed them (consented) entrance into her home - they are ok legally to be inside the premises. Also, there is Constitutional case law that gives them the authority to ask for identification.
I understand that she could consent to entry and I didn't hear whether she did or not but my point was that she reported concerns about someone possibly OUTSIDE THE HOUSE. So they had no business all but inviting themselves in. Had they not done that, none of this would have happened. I could be wrong San but I believe the case law you are referring to only gives law enforcement the authority to ask for ID if the subject is suspected of committing a crime. Unless you are talking about the State Constitution of which I confess almost total ignorance. Thanks for the comment San.
I believe he is charged with murder, as he should be. In the very first place, she contacted police for a suspected prowler and this jerk acted like it was an imposition! Secondly, they had absolutely no business entering her house and especially pestering her for her identification. If he doesn't spend a hard twenty for his actions, there's no justice!!
yes, should spend deep time, he imposed...the transaction was done when they said good night...he somehow had to get into her house
Clive - if she allowed them (consented) entrance into her home - they are ok legally to be inside the premises. Also, there is Constitutional case law that gives them the authority to ask for identification.
I understand that she could consent to entry and I didn't hear whether she did or not but my point was that she reported concerns about someone possibly OUTSIDE THE HOUSE. So they had no business all but inviting themselves in. Had they not done that, none of this would have happened. I could be wrong San but I believe the case law you are referring to only gives law enforcement the authority to ask for ID if the subject is suspected of committing a crime. Unless you are talking about the State Constitution of which I confess almost total ignorance. Thanks for the comment San.