Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dani Richards's avatar

to answer your questions: I think they did test it, and they knew -- or had a pretty good idea -- what the results might be. I think that has been established. Unfortunately, these test results were withheld from the public and we were lied to that it was "safe and effective" and also the right thing to do to "protect yourself and others." So yeah, they knew.

Why did the pharma companies and government agencies that are there to protect us do the opposite and cause deliberate harm, knowingly? That is the tougher question because the answer is so ugly: there is great evil in the world masquerading as good, and evil does what it does. Including harnessing the good and trusting nature of most of us, with our motivations to do the right thing, to help, to save one another..... evil especially delights in coercing us to do its bidding. And then, for those of us who are the survivors, to rip the veil off at the last moment and laugh at our horrified, dawning realization that we participated in our own demise and that of our loved ones (and all of humanity) -- all the while, thinking we were doing something beneficial.

Evil. There's your answer.

Expand full comment
Dani Richards's avatar

What I am still having trouble understanding is how and why so many professional, biological scientists allowed themselves and family members to be jabbed.

Because there are plenty of us who are not professional scientists (but learned basic science in school) who could see how obvious it was that this was 1) experimental and voluntary; and 2) pushed way too hard in too slick of a way to be on the up and up.

Expand full comment
19 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?