You insinuated that not moving on an issue resulted in stagnation. I live as I say. For example, I have an OPP pig fake and defective detective on a bed of stone tied down while I take my time composing the proof of 14 criminal charges I am submitting to the OPIRD BUT in taking my time I discovered in the last 6 years that the OPIPRD onl…
You insinuated that not moving on an issue resulted in stagnation. I live as I say. For example, I have an OPP pig fake and defective detective on a bed of stone tied down while I take my time composing the proof of 14 criminal charges I am submitting to the OPIRD BUT in taking my time I discovered in the last 6 years that the OPIPRD only entertained 1% of the complainants problems with the OPP pigs. SOooooooo my next step if they toss it is to send the whole story along with names of the culprits to the NRA where I have been a supporting member for decades to have it published plus sending it to major gun rights clubs in Canuckistan PLUS politicizing and publicizing it nation wide as well as online. More thought and time I came up with legal counsel I could myself or hire a criminal lawyer to legally file charges with the Crown to be prosecuted.
I have three backups to push the issue and the lying pos pig will not escape punishment of serious criminal charges.
Get it? Strategizing caused ALL charges against me to be dropped. It was a three year period and now it is MY TURN to raise hell with corrupt thieves and liars wearing blue uniforms. I will raise hell for every single one of five pigs if they want to be difficult. I do not quit! Last fight was eleven years and a victory that resulted in a five digit payout.
There are three ways of thinking and doing things here, the right way, the wrong way and the Canuckistan way and the last two are wrong and the sheeple do and think those last two ways.
"You insinuated that not moving on an issue resulted in stagnation."
That is correct. However, moving on an issue does not mean implementing it without due diligence, nor does it mean sitting on it without moving forward with research.
I tend to see common ground here. But I see all around me in the real world sheeple afraid to rock the boat but I want to turn the damned thing right over.
I think both of you are saying the same thing...ha ha...very good exchange...IMO as with mRNA, we need 50 to 100 more years of bench science with rodents, animals etc. to prove safe and strong ethical debate with populations before we even see it again.
You insinuated that not moving on an issue resulted in stagnation. I live as I say. For example, I have an OPP pig fake and defective detective on a bed of stone tied down while I take my time composing the proof of 14 criminal charges I am submitting to the OPIRD BUT in taking my time I discovered in the last 6 years that the OPIPRD only entertained 1% of the complainants problems with the OPP pigs. SOooooooo my next step if they toss it is to send the whole story along with names of the culprits to the NRA where I have been a supporting member for decades to have it published plus sending it to major gun rights clubs in Canuckistan PLUS politicizing and publicizing it nation wide as well as online. More thought and time I came up with legal counsel I could myself or hire a criminal lawyer to legally file charges with the Crown to be prosecuted.
I have three backups to push the issue and the lying pos pig will not escape punishment of serious criminal charges.
Get it? Strategizing caused ALL charges against me to be dropped. It was a three year period and now it is MY TURN to raise hell with corrupt thieves and liars wearing blue uniforms. I will raise hell for every single one of five pigs if they want to be difficult. I do not quit! Last fight was eleven years and a victory that resulted in a five digit payout.
There are three ways of thinking and doing things here, the right way, the wrong way and the Canuckistan way and the last two are wrong and the sheeple do and think those last two ways.
"You insinuated that not moving on an issue resulted in stagnation."
That is correct. However, moving on an issue does not mean implementing it without due diligence, nor does it mean sitting on it without moving forward with research.
I tend to see common ground here. But I see all around me in the real world sheeple afraid to rock the boat but I want to turn the damned thing right over.
I think both of you are saying the same thing...ha ha...very good exchange...IMO as with mRNA, we need 50 to 100 more years of bench science with rodents, animals etc. to prove safe and strong ethical debate with populations before we even see it again.