Why didn't the FDA under the Biden administration demand & require any COVID mRNA technology based boosters e.g. bivalent booster (Wuhan strain plus BA.4 &.5 clades) to undergo HUMAN clinical trials?
Why didn't the FDA under the Biden administration demand & require any COVID mRNA technology based boosters e.g. bivalent booster (Wuhan strain plus BA.4 &.5 clades) to undergo HUMAN clinical trials?
Why? Why was the decision to grant EUA based on 8 mice (a rodent model) that I may add resulted in the mice actually getting sick from COVID; we used a rodent model where rodents got sick to get EUA?
Rochelle Walensky resigned… She will never be accountable for anything as she was NEVER appointed as a director of CDC…. She was sworn (and not a proper oath) as a senior advisor. That’s it.
I am finding now that multiple FOIA requests are not returning any info/docs regarding Biden admin oaths to the office. Are there any? Not holding my breath.
It sounds so stupid, it's as if they wanted nobody to take them... or at least, only the REALLY , REALLY STUPID people to take them.
Who is really pulling the strings? Is any of that news real? What mice study? Who does studies with 8 mice?? Why not 12, or 20 ? or 100? none of it makes sense.
They had Shock & Awe to force through the original Bioweapon. Time pressure. Fear, everywhere.
Enough of it to distract from the abysmal performance of the jabs. With the collusion of the regulators. With the hypnotic 'Safe & Effective' from TonyTheRat et al really earning its keep for the first time.
But there was still compelling evidence generated, as we are discovering with the monthly drops the FDA tried to hide for 75 years from Fizer. Soon, thanks to Aaron Siri, we'll see what MurdeRNA has been hiding, with the collusion of regulators. Side bet, I predict some extreme levels of redactions to come.
Without all that 'sky is falling pressure' for the bivalent round they had to reduce the evidence that would build up and telegraph their psychopathy. The premeditated murder that it is, on a global scale. With people waking up they just had to get it out there, stat.
It was the 'thin edge of the wedge' dynamic in play, like it always is. The radical playbook literally has 1 play, only variation is how bloody the play gets. Those pressures above Trojaned the gene therapy bioweapon into deltoids despite what should have been every check and balance. It normalised the gross medical malfeasance.
So the second time it was routine. The 3rd time it was nothing. Recall the comments from a panel of psychopaths (ACIP? VRBPAC?) about injecting young children? "We won't know what it does until until we start injecting them (children)" - almost verbatim. They need to swing, as an aside.
Peripheral, they knew it would be approved no matter what they did or did not do. They control every Organ, and they will never be held accountable for this democide. So why not insult the masses further and present this farcical BS mouse model? They didn't even have to go through the motions.
The global elites long ago worked out that the citizens of Western and other nations have an insatiable appetite for bullshit. They lap it up like cats at a saucer of milk. If not fed their daily diet of bullshit through State sponsored propaganda agencies, the citizens go into withdrawal. Remember the bullshit about Saddam stockpiling WMDs? Anyone with an IQ above 69 correctly detected immediately that it was bullshit as soon as Bush, COLON Powell, Tony Bliar et al started dribbling it. The only question was whether these fools, who are dumb, were so dumb that they believed their own bullshit, or whether they actually knew it was bullshit. All the evidence was there from day one that, as dumb as they are/were, they knew it was bullshit. They knew but deliberately peddled bullshit. But somehow, perhaps through a mass formation psychosis, the mass of people, who had the required > 69 IQ necessary to know that what they were being fed was bullshit were able to hypnotize themselves that it wasn't really bullshit after all. In so doing, they were able to consume the bullshit and assure themselves of an ongoing daily fix.
They swallowed the sucker bait hook line and sinker. It 's exactly the same process that' s been at work with the bullshit that human trials weren't necessary for the bivalent boosters and that 8 mice trials in which all the mice got sick were sufficient. The more one thinks about it, the more it becomes clear that maybe these jabs are a good thing, as long as they are not mandated. I am starting to become concerned that new and inadequately tested boosters are not being rolled out fast enough. It's immensely frustrating that so many booster recipients are still vertical. It is horrifying to think that booster stockpiles may be becoming depleted. More are desperately needed.
Why were no human trials required by the Biden administration?
Who knows? It could be any or none of the following reasons.
1. As part of his post doc studies for his DSc, Biden exhaustively investigated the safety aspects of 8 mice trials. As the most accomplished and brilliant scientist the US has ever produced, he knew from going over the methodology and data of both his own and other studies that human trials are unnecessary.
2. Biden cares. He cares a lot about his people, the subjects of his reign and he knew that these jabs would be really good for people. He really cares about the health of the American people.
3. Big Pharma greased old Joe's palm with a contribution of billions of &$ paid into one or several of the Biden family's offshore accounts.
4. China and the CCP instructed Joe to skip the human trials in order to get as much as possible of the mRNA generated spike protein that China refuses to allow its own citizens to have into American arms as fast as possible and matched Big Pharma's contribution, adding it to what they had already paid Joe for the nuclear codes.
Nope not him try googling Dr John in front of my last name. There are articles from the Herald Sun and the Age 1st lot around 92, second nd lot about 2002,3 . And that’s the tip of the iceberg. Also self confessed p… I developed severe depression and saw life from both sides.
Why bother since 90% of drug trials are faked in some way to begin with. If there were true and honest independent drug trials along with an honest FDA, 9 out of 10 drugs would never see the light of day. And all vaccines would be shelved.
Everything they ever did... was to get the vaccine approved .. what’s a few thousand deaths when you can earn billions... stupid half brained politicians signed away the lives of the very people they were supposed to protect...and you suckers still vote them in.
Relatedly, why was Maddie de Garay's multitude of severe adverse reactions in the Pfizer clinical trial, which left her in a wheelchair and with a feeding tube, counted as a mere stomache ache?
US Senator Ron Johnson Holds Expert Panel On Federal Vaccine Mandates - Nov 2 2021
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: Stephanie de Garay's daughter Maddie, in a wheelchair and with a feeding tube taped to her nose, sits next to her mother as she testifies.
TRANSCRIPT
1:59:06
STEPHANIE DE GARAY: Hi, my name is Stephanie de Garay and this is my daughter Maddie. When she was 12 years old she participated in the Pfizer covid vaccine trial for 12 - 15 year olds at Cincinnati Children's Hospital. This is the first trial any of my kids have ever been in. I never had considered ever putting them in a trial before, but this seemed like, you know, when they asked if they could be in it, it seemed like a win-win, you know?
So it's been over 9 months since she got her second dose. She can't walk. She's in a wheelchair. She has an NG tube for all of her nutrition. She has constant pain in her stomach, back, and neck. She was over there laying on chairs because she can't make it through this. She can't feel her legs. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.
When she got her first dose, her reaction was typical. She had fever, body aches, and fatigue, and it went away in a couple days.
When she got her second dose she had immediate pain where she had gotten the injection, and the first thing she told me when she, because her dad took her, was, that didn't happen, that hurt way more than the first time. Like, enough to point it out.
In less than 12 hours she developed severe abdominal pain, horrible nausea, painful electric shocks on her spine and neck. Her hands were ice cold when you touched them. She had— and on her feet. Pain all over her body. Her vaccine arm went numb. And I'm finding more and more stuff is, I, I, you forget stuff because so much has happened to her. Like, as I read through the things, I I keep redocumenting everything.
She had chest pain, severe chest pain. The way she described it, it felt like it was being, her heart was being pulled out of her neck. Tachycardia that was actually seen on an EKG. And she was extremely dizzy so she felt like she couldn't stand up.
So those were her reactions.
I just want to walk though, give you everybody a better idea of what happens in a trial because I did not know. My kids had never been in a trial before, so I went in trusting the drug companies, the FDA, CDC, the hospital where the trial was held, Cincinnati Children's, a very reputable hospital.
So when you enter the trial, everybody uses a trial app. And there are slides and they'll be available later so that you can see more detail. It's called Trial [inaudible] and they log the reactions for 7 days after each dose, that's it.
The app only allows you to record solicited adverse events like fever, redness, injection site pain, swelling, headache, vomiting, and other typical, expected reactions. That is it. And you do, say, mild, moderate, severe. Severe means that you had to go to the ER. You record your fever, like the actual amount and the swelling. So that's all the details. There's no freeform at all to fill in any other reaction that you have beyond the typical nonserious adverse events other than, well that's it. Shock.
So there's a full list on realnotrare.com slash about that will be available.*
What you have to do if you have any other type of adverse event is, you have to call the study doctor or the principal investigator, and that's the only way to record this. There's no way to have any unbiased way of entering it in and documenting it.
I'm sorry, I'm going off track.
So we did what we were told. We called the study doctor and they told us to go to go to Cincinnati Children's ER where the trial was held to check for appendicitis. She did not have appendicitis. They couldn't even find her appendix.
What made it into the trial record is unclear. And and yes, we did ask, several times and have it documented. We still don't know what was actually reported.
So basically as you can see this leaves a lot of room for human error, and concern of recording bias coming from the principal investigator, which was Dr. Frenck** in her case.
So what was said about Maddie? The next slide. If you go then to the documentation.
2:04:18 [slide appears on screen]
STEPHANIE DE GARAY: So, the New England Journal of Medicine article about the covid, the Pfizer covid vaccine in adolescents. So first take note the principal investigator for Maddie's trial is the lead author for the New England Journal of Medicine article.***
The adverse event section has 308 words, 76 of those were dedicated to describing one single patient that had simply a temperature greater than 40 degrees. Not great to have but that, you know [inaudible]. There is absolutely no mention of any of Maddie's adverse reactions in that article. Zero.
In the EUA [Emergency Use Authorization] amendment Maddie's adverse reaction was reduced to 5 lines that they claimed was eventually diagnosed as functional abdominal pain. It's a stomach ache.
By the data cut off for the trial, on March 13th, Maddie experienced over 35 adverse events, different things happening to her, very similar to all the stories that you're hearing here. This happened during the trial. Some examples are blood in her urine 7 times. Decreased vision. Loss of feeling from her waist down, dizziness, fainting, tremors, muscle weakness, and more. They're all available in the slides, all of her reactions. None of these were mentioned in either document.
She went to the ER 9 times and was hospitalized 3 times for a total of 63 days, and this was by June 1st. Look at the dates of the article and around when this was approved. Maddie was in the hospital when the EUA was approved for 12 to 15 year olds. The doctor did not even know it.
So let me ask you this. Functional abdominal pain. Stomach ache. Does your child, when they have a stomach ache, does that put your child in a wheelchair? Does your child's stomachache require a feeding tube? Does your child spend 64 days in the hospital for the stomach ache? If they did a urine test when they have a stomach ache, would there be blood in their urine? I don't think so.
I thought that Maddie would be in the best hands possible in the rare chance she had a severe reaction. That was not the case. They did everything in their power to hide everything that happened to her. And that is why this happening to all these other people and kids.
So my question is, you're hearing my story, Maddie was not kicked out of the trial, so, she's still in it. By the way, so is my son Lukas who did not, he was in the placebo group, and he did not get the vaccine. So they have one person, if you want to know that that they can— and he hasn't had covid.
If they minimalized Maddie's reaction to the vaccines like this, I wonder what really happened to those in the clinical trials who had a reaction to the first dose, they never got to have the second dose, that means they're out of the trials, they're disqualified. I wonder what else was hidden in either the Pfizer trial or any of the other ones. Because I know there was things, there were things they didn't— Thank you.
2:08:22
US SENATOR RON JOHNSON: Thank you, Stephanie. I've got a quick question. Obviously, we invited the CEO from Pfizer or some representative from Pfizer. Nobody showed up. You, because you had the courage to come forward in June**** you have had some media attention, not by the mainstream media, but Pfizer has to be aware of you. Have they reached out to you since June?
STEPHANIE DE GARAY: Neither Pfizer, the FDA, or the CDC has ever talked to us or attempted to. We have never heard anything from them, ever.
US SENATOR RON JOHNSON: That is outrageous.
STEPHANIE DE GARAY: Filed it in VAERS* also, still didn't hear anything.
US SENATOR RON JOHNSON: So that is outrageous. I mean, not only totally cast aside but I think what you describe in your testimony would, I would determine as a coverup. But thank you. Maddie, God bless you.
*** "Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine in Adolescents", Frenck et al., New England Journal of Medicine, May 27, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2107456
Rochelle Walensky resigned… She will never be accountable for anything as she was NEVER appointed as a director of CDC…. She was sworn (and not a proper oath) as a senior advisor. That’s it.
I am finding now that multiple FOIA requests are not returning any info/docs regarding Biden admin oaths to the office. Are there any? Not holding my breath.
Because depopulation was the goal.
It sounds so stupid, it's as if they wanted nobody to take them... or at least, only the REALLY , REALLY STUPID people to take them.
Who is really pulling the strings? Is any of that news real? What mice study? Who does studies with 8 mice?? Why not 12, or 20 ? or 100? none of it makes sense.
Assuming that isn't rhetorical, Paul.
They had Shock & Awe to force through the original Bioweapon. Time pressure. Fear, everywhere.
Enough of it to distract from the abysmal performance of the jabs. With the collusion of the regulators. With the hypnotic 'Safe & Effective' from TonyTheRat et al really earning its keep for the first time.
But there was still compelling evidence generated, as we are discovering with the monthly drops the FDA tried to hide for 75 years from Fizer. Soon, thanks to Aaron Siri, we'll see what MurdeRNA has been hiding, with the collusion of regulators. Side bet, I predict some extreme levels of redactions to come.
Without all that 'sky is falling pressure' for the bivalent round they had to reduce the evidence that would build up and telegraph their psychopathy. The premeditated murder that it is, on a global scale. With people waking up they just had to get it out there, stat.
It was the 'thin edge of the wedge' dynamic in play, like it always is. The radical playbook literally has 1 play, only variation is how bloody the play gets. Those pressures above Trojaned the gene therapy bioweapon into deltoids despite what should have been every check and balance. It normalised the gross medical malfeasance.
So the second time it was routine. The 3rd time it was nothing. Recall the comments from a panel of psychopaths (ACIP? VRBPAC?) about injecting young children? "We won't know what it does until until we start injecting them (children)" - almost verbatim. They need to swing, as an aside.
Peripheral, they knew it would be approved no matter what they did or did not do. They control every Organ, and they will never be held accountable for this democide. So why not insult the masses further and present this farcical BS mouse model? They didn't even have to go through the motions.
Peace.
BECAUSE THEY ARE ALL INVOLVED IN TREASON
The global elites long ago worked out that the citizens of Western and other nations have an insatiable appetite for bullshit. They lap it up like cats at a saucer of milk. If not fed their daily diet of bullshit through State sponsored propaganda agencies, the citizens go into withdrawal. Remember the bullshit about Saddam stockpiling WMDs? Anyone with an IQ above 69 correctly detected immediately that it was bullshit as soon as Bush, COLON Powell, Tony Bliar et al started dribbling it. The only question was whether these fools, who are dumb, were so dumb that they believed their own bullshit, or whether they actually knew it was bullshit. All the evidence was there from day one that, as dumb as they are/were, they knew it was bullshit. They knew but deliberately peddled bullshit. But somehow, perhaps through a mass formation psychosis, the mass of people, who had the required > 69 IQ necessary to know that what they were being fed was bullshit were able to hypnotize themselves that it wasn't really bullshit after all. In so doing, they were able to consume the bullshit and assure themselves of an ongoing daily fix.
They swallowed the sucker bait hook line and sinker. It 's exactly the same process that' s been at work with the bullshit that human trials weren't necessary for the bivalent boosters and that 8 mice trials in which all the mice got sick were sufficient. The more one thinks about it, the more it becomes clear that maybe these jabs are a good thing, as long as they are not mandated. I am starting to become concerned that new and inadequately tested boosters are not being rolled out fast enough. It's immensely frustrating that so many booster recipients are still vertical. It is horrifying to think that booster stockpiles may be becoming depleted. More are desperately needed.
So many assholes.
So few boosters.
Why were no human trials required by the Biden administration?
Who knows? It could be any or none of the following reasons.
1. As part of his post doc studies for his DSc, Biden exhaustively investigated the safety aspects of 8 mice trials. As the most accomplished and brilliant scientist the US has ever produced, he knew from going over the methodology and data of both his own and other studies that human trials are unnecessary.
2. Biden cares. He cares a lot about his people, the subjects of his reign and he knew that these jabs would be really good for people. He really cares about the health of the American people.
3. Big Pharma greased old Joe's palm with a contribution of billions of &$ paid into one or several of the Biden family's offshore accounts.
4. China and the CCP instructed Joe to skip the human trials in order to get as much as possible of the mRNA generated spike protein that China refuses to allow its own citizens to have into American arms as fast as possible and matched Big Pharma's contribution, adding it to what they had already paid Joe for the nuclear codes.
Because it was all run and OWNED by our very own DOD which should be renamed the War Department of Domestic Genocide.
You are correct.
Nope not him try googling Dr John in front of my last name. There are articles from the Herald Sun and the Age 1st lot around 92, second nd lot about 2002,3 . And that’s the tip of the iceberg. Also self confessed p… I developed severe depression and saw life from both sides.
Why bother since 90% of drug trials are faked in some way to begin with. If there were true and honest independent drug trials along with an honest FDA, 9 out of 10 drugs would never see the light of day. And all vaccines would be shelved.
Because they knew already the damage caused by the mod mRNA spike protein introduction.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/A62aOOtBuG3p/
How many reading this thread are aware of the elite's plans for "Soft Kill?" How many of you have heard of the Secret Covenant? With respect to all, please visit and read: https://darellong.substack.com/p/what-about-soft-kill-promoted-by
The answer to the question is the "Secret Covenant. "
Pfizer is making tens of billions of dollars testing it’s vaccine on lab primates, why not?
Everything they ever did... was to get the vaccine approved .. what’s a few thousand deaths when you can earn billions... stupid half brained politicians signed away the lives of the very people they were supposed to protect...and you suckers still vote them in.
Relatedly, why was Maddie de Garay's multitude of severe adverse reactions in the Pfizer clinical trial, which left her in a wheelchair and with a feeding tube, counted as a mere stomache ache?
US Senator Ron Johnson Holds Expert Panel On Federal Vaccine Mandates - Nov 2 2021
Posted February 6, 2022
https://rumble.com/vu8wa4-us-senator-ron-johnson-holds-expert-panel-on-federal-vaccine-mandates.html
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: Stephanie de Garay's daughter Maddie, in a wheelchair and with a feeding tube taped to her nose, sits next to her mother as she testifies.
TRANSCRIPT
1:59:06
STEPHANIE DE GARAY: Hi, my name is Stephanie de Garay and this is my daughter Maddie. When she was 12 years old she participated in the Pfizer covid vaccine trial for 12 - 15 year olds at Cincinnati Children's Hospital. This is the first trial any of my kids have ever been in. I never had considered ever putting them in a trial before, but this seemed like, you know, when they asked if they could be in it, it seemed like a win-win, you know?
So it's been over 9 months since she got her second dose. She can't walk. She's in a wheelchair. She has an NG tube for all of her nutrition. She has constant pain in her stomach, back, and neck. She was over there laying on chairs because she can't make it through this. She can't feel her legs. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.
When she got her first dose, her reaction was typical. She had fever, body aches, and fatigue, and it went away in a couple days.
When she got her second dose she had immediate pain where she had gotten the injection, and the first thing she told me when she, because her dad took her, was, that didn't happen, that hurt way more than the first time. Like, enough to point it out.
In less than 12 hours she developed severe abdominal pain, horrible nausea, painful electric shocks on her spine and neck. Her hands were ice cold when you touched them. She had— and on her feet. Pain all over her body. Her vaccine arm went numb. And I'm finding more and more stuff is, I, I, you forget stuff because so much has happened to her. Like, as I read through the things, I I keep redocumenting everything.
She had chest pain, severe chest pain. The way she described it, it felt like it was being, her heart was being pulled out of her neck. Tachycardia that was actually seen on an EKG. And she was extremely dizzy so she felt like she couldn't stand up.
So those were her reactions.
I just want to walk though, give you everybody a better idea of what happens in a trial because I did not know. My kids had never been in a trial before, so I went in trusting the drug companies, the FDA, CDC, the hospital where the trial was held, Cincinnati Children's, a very reputable hospital.
So when you enter the trial, everybody uses a trial app. And there are slides and they'll be available later so that you can see more detail. It's called Trial [inaudible] and they log the reactions for 7 days after each dose, that's it.
The app only allows you to record solicited adverse events like fever, redness, injection site pain, swelling, headache, vomiting, and other typical, expected reactions. That is it. And you do, say, mild, moderate, severe. Severe means that you had to go to the ER. You record your fever, like the actual amount and the swelling. So that's all the details. There's no freeform at all to fill in any other reaction that you have beyond the typical nonserious adverse events other than, well that's it. Shock.
So there's a full list on realnotrare.com slash about that will be available.*
What you have to do if you have any other type of adverse event is, you have to call the study doctor or the principal investigator, and that's the only way to record this. There's no way to have any unbiased way of entering it in and documenting it.
I'm sorry, I'm going off track.
So we did what we were told. We called the study doctor and they told us to go to go to Cincinnati Children's ER where the trial was held to check for appendicitis. She did not have appendicitis. They couldn't even find her appendix.
What made it into the trial record is unclear. And and yes, we did ask, several times and have it documented. We still don't know what was actually reported.
So basically as you can see this leaves a lot of room for human error, and concern of recording bias coming from the principal investigator, which was Dr. Frenck** in her case.
So what was said about Maddie? The next slide. If you go then to the documentation.
2:04:18 [slide appears on screen]
STEPHANIE DE GARAY: So, the New England Journal of Medicine article about the covid, the Pfizer covid vaccine in adolescents. So first take note the principal investigator for Maddie's trial is the lead author for the New England Journal of Medicine article.***
The adverse event section has 308 words, 76 of those were dedicated to describing one single patient that had simply a temperature greater than 40 degrees. Not great to have but that, you know [inaudible]. There is absolutely no mention of any of Maddie's adverse reactions in that article. Zero.
In the EUA [Emergency Use Authorization] amendment Maddie's adverse reaction was reduced to 5 lines that they claimed was eventually diagnosed as functional abdominal pain. It's a stomach ache.
By the data cut off for the trial, on March 13th, Maddie experienced over 35 adverse events, different things happening to her, very similar to all the stories that you're hearing here. This happened during the trial. Some examples are blood in her urine 7 times. Decreased vision. Loss of feeling from her waist down, dizziness, fainting, tremors, muscle weakness, and more. They're all available in the slides, all of her reactions. None of these were mentioned in either document.
She went to the ER 9 times and was hospitalized 3 times for a total of 63 days, and this was by June 1st. Look at the dates of the article and around when this was approved. Maddie was in the hospital when the EUA was approved for 12 to 15 year olds. The doctor did not even know it.
So let me ask you this. Functional abdominal pain. Stomach ache. Does your child, when they have a stomach ache, does that put your child in a wheelchair? Does your child's stomachache require a feeding tube? Does your child spend 64 days in the hospital for the stomach ache? If they did a urine test when they have a stomach ache, would there be blood in their urine? I don't think so.
I thought that Maddie would be in the best hands possible in the rare chance she had a severe reaction. That was not the case. They did everything in their power to hide everything that happened to her. And that is why this happening to all these other people and kids.
So my question is, you're hearing my story, Maddie was not kicked out of the trial, so, she's still in it. By the way, so is my son Lukas who did not, he was in the placebo group, and he did not get the vaccine. So they have one person, if you want to know that that they can— and he hasn't had covid.
If they minimalized Maddie's reaction to the vaccines like this, I wonder what really happened to those in the clinical trials who had a reaction to the first dose, they never got to have the second dose, that means they're out of the trials, they're disqualified. I wonder what else was hidden in either the Pfizer trial or any of the other ones. Because I know there was things, there were things they didn't— Thank you.
2:08:22
US SENATOR RON JOHNSON: Thank you, Stephanie. I've got a quick question. Obviously, we invited the CEO from Pfizer or some representative from Pfizer. Nobody showed up. You, because you had the courage to come forward in June**** you have had some media attention, not by the mainstream media, but Pfizer has to be aware of you. Have they reached out to you since June?
STEPHANIE DE GARAY: Neither Pfizer, the FDA, or the CDC has ever talked to us or attempted to. We have never heard anything from them, ever.
US SENATOR RON JOHNSON: That is outrageous.
STEPHANIE DE GARAY: Filed it in VAERS* also, still didn't hear anything.
US SENATOR RON JOHNSON: So that is outrageous. I mean, not only totally cast aside but I think what you describe in your testimony would, I would determine as a coverup. But thank you. Maddie, God bless you.
2:09:19
[END]
# # #
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:
*Maddie de Garay's entry, with links to other testimony and interviews with her mother Stephanie de Garay, can be found at https://www.realnotrare.com/post/maddie-de-garay
**Robert W. Frenck, Jr., MD.
*** "Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine in Adolescents", Frenck et al., New England Journal of Medicine, May 27, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2107456
**** Stephanie de Garay gave her testimony about her daughter Maddie's injuries in the Pfizer trial for Senator Ron Johnson's roundtable discussion on June 29, 2021. For a transcript of that testimony and relevant links, see https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/85369.html . The video of the roundtzable is at https://rumble.com/vj79qt-press-conference-with-families-speaking-out-about-adverse-vaccine-reactions.html
CLIP (different camera, better sound): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4X6VMdTK8Y
*The CDC's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. https://vaers.hhs.gov/about.html
(Note: https://openvaers.com/covid-data provides VAERS data in a more reader-friendly presentation)