7 studies that help explain why the vaccinated are getting more infected; IMO, natural immunity is not breached; the non-neutralizing Abs bind to the virus spike, & enhances infectiousness of virus
there is binding but non-neutralizing antibodies don't sterilize the virus & does not eliminate it; non-neutralizing Abs enhance or facilitate infection in host cells; ADE, original antigenic sin, OAS
Yahi et al.: so it is the binding to the virus by non-neutralizing Abs that do not eliminate the virus but increases infectiousness…it enhances the infection capability and explains why the vaccinated are getting infected; the non-neutralizing Abs bind to the virus in the upper respiratory tract and drive infection yet binds to the lower respiratory tract and prevents severe disease (transfection from infected to non-infected cells). This study shows original antigenic sin and ADE and as Vanden Bossche asserts, there is subversion of the natural innate and natural acquired-adaptive immune response.
“our data suggest that the balance between neutralizing and facilitating antibodies in vaccinated individuals is in favor of neutralization for the original Wuhan/D614G strain. However, in the case of the Delta variant, neutralizing antibodies have a decreased affinity for the spike protein, whereas facilitating antibodies display a strikingly increased affinity. Thus, ADE may be a concern for people receiving vaccines based on the original Wuhan strain spike sequence (either mRNA or viral vectors).”
The 7 key studies are:
1)Van Egeren et al.: “Risk of rapid evolutionary escape from biomedical interventions targeting SARS-CoV-2 spike protein”
3)An infectivity-enhancing site on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein targeted by antibodies
4)Lectins enhance SARS-CoV-2 infection and influence neutralizing antibodies
5)Structural insight into SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies and modulation of syncytia
6)The emergence and ongoing convergent evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 N501Y lineages
If someone labels you as an anti-vaxxer for refusing a covid transfection, simply inform them of the research of Christine Stabelle Benn who pointed out that the data shows that live -attenuates vaccines (while not risk free) are the only vaccines which offer specific and non-specific benefits (protect against other diseases). All other vaccines (inactivated, protein subunit etc..) come with specific benefits but also non-specific side effects.
With this in mind, I tell people I received the 'live un-attenuated covid vaccine so it's all good (ie I had Sars cov2).
Doc, a lot of us medical professionals thought all those billions they spent researching HIV/AIDS, more than they spent on cancer, were wasted!
But we were proven wrong, it wasn't wasted, it was "weaponized."
Those bastards, they did it again, didn't they?
Even at that, the raw data will still be used for good, like the monoclonal cancer antibodies.
LET US NOT LET THEM FUCK UP THE DATA! (like the temperature adjustments)