7 studies that help explain why the vaccinated are getting more infected; IMO, natural immunity is not breached; the non-neutralizing Abs bind to the virus spike, & enhances infectiousness of virus
7 studies that help explain why the vaccinated are getting more infected; IMO, natural immunity is not breached; the non-neutralizing Abs bind to the virus spike, & enhances infectiousness of virus
there is binding but non-neutralizing antibodies don't sterilize the virus & does not eliminate it; non-neutralizing Abs enhance or facilitate infection in host cells; ADE, original antigenic sin, OAS
If someone labels you as an anti-vaxxer for refusing a covid transfection, simply inform them of the research of Christine Stabelle Benn who pointed out that the data shows that live -attenuates vaccines (while not risk free) are the only vaccines which offer specific and non-specific benefits (protect against other diseases). All other vaccines (inactivated, protein subunit etc..) come with specific benefits but also non-specific side effects.
With this in mind, I tell people I received the 'live un-attenuated covid vaccine so it's all good (ie I had Sars cov2).
Unfortunately the effectiveness of the jabs to generate profits seems the only measure of success considered worth measuring by the cheerleader media presstitutes.
There are clearly two worlds of immuno-vaccinology. What COVID vaccine is being considered to become a part of the routine vaccination schedule for the very young? They seem to continue undeterred.
I can't help but think that trying to get through to people using actual science is a waste of time. You just can't do it. I think framing it as a human rights issue might be the way to go.
If someone labels you as an anti-vaxxer for refusing a covid transfection, simply inform them of the research of Christine Stabelle Benn who pointed out that the data shows that live -attenuates vaccines (while not risk free) are the only vaccines which offer specific and non-specific benefits (protect against other diseases). All other vaccines (inactivated, protein subunit etc..) come with specific benefits but also non-specific side effects.
With this in mind, I tell people I received the 'live un-attenuated covid vaccine so it's all good (ie I had Sars cov2).
Doc, a lot of us medical professionals thought all those billions they spent researching HIV/AIDS, more than they spent on cancer, were wasted!
But we were proven wrong, it wasn't wasted, it was "weaponized."
Those bastards, they did it again, didn't they?
Even at that, the raw data will still be used for good, like the monoclonal cancer antibodies.
LET US NOT LET THEM FUCK UP THE DATA! (like the temperature adjustments)
Unfortunately the effectiveness of the jabs to generate profits seems the only measure of success considered worth measuring by the cheerleader media presstitutes.
ADE is one mechanism along with antigenic sin. But there is definitely crippling of innate and adaptive immunity.
I’m a future article, can you please elaborate on why you don’t feel natural immunity is breached?
Cf.
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche: Virologist, Vaccinologist, Immunologist (GAVI & Bill/Melinda Gates Found) https://www.bitchute.com/video/5TEVjYJaPdO7/
There are clearly two worlds of immuno-vaccinology. What COVID vaccine is being considered to become a part of the routine vaccination schedule for the very young? They seem to continue undeterred.
I can't help but think that trying to get through to people using actual science is a waste of time. You just can't do it. I think framing it as a human rights issue might be the way to go.
Journalists grill Minister of Transport Omar Alghabra on vax passports & mask mandates in airports.....https://rumble.com/v1802pr-journalists-grill-minister-of-transport-omar-alghabra-on-vax-passports-and-.html?mref=6zof&mc=dgip3&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=The+Canadian+Independent&ep=2
WEF graduate, for sure....obviously has NOT looked at the Pfizer documents.....