How bad are the mRNA technology gene based vaccines? (Malone, Weissman, Bourla, Bancel, Sahin, Karikó et al. inventors & makers); well, REAL BAD! mRNA in nature (our cells) is NOT like mRNA in vaccine
that is key & Weissman lied in Jan 2021 saying mRNA in cells same as in mRNA vaccine, he lied! mRNA? at what costs to humanity? Is methylpseudouridine base change causing 24/7 cell spike production?
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06800-3
‘In vitro-transcribed (IVT) mRNAs are modalities that can combat human disease, exemplified by their use as vaccines for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). IVT mRNAs are transfected into target cells, where they are translated into recombinant protein, and the biological activity or immunogenicity of the encoded protein exerts an intended therapeutic effect1,2. Modified ribonucleotides are commonly incorporated into therapeutic IVT mRNAs to decrease their innate immunogenicity3,4,5, but their effects on mRNA translation fidelity have not been fully explored. Here we demonstrate that incorporation of N1-methylpseudouridine into mRNA results in +1 ribosomal frameshifting in vitro and that cellular immunity in mice and humans to +1 frameshifted products from BNT162b2 vaccine mRNA translation occurs after vaccination. The +1 ribosome frameshifting observed is probably a consequence of N1-methylpseudouridine-induced ribosome stalling during IVT mRNA translation, with frameshifting occurring at ribosome slippery sequences. However, we demonstrate that synonymous targeting of such slippery sequences provides an effective strategy to reduce the production of frameshifted products. Overall, these data increase our understanding of how modified ribonucleotides affect the fidelity of mRNA translation, and although there are no adverse outcomes reported from mistranslation of mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in humans, these data highlight potential off-target effects for future mRNA-based therapeutics and demonstrate the requirement for sequence optimization.’
Why did Weissman and all linked to the invention of mRNA and the vaccines have to lie to the public? Why did they? Did they ever consider the implications of their research to humanity? The harmful implications. Did their swapping of cellular mRNA for N1-methylpseudouridine cause such a change in the codon codes that the ‘off’ codes to stop the translation of protein at the ribosomes, are no longer functional? That not even theoretically, but we may infact be making spike protein on cellular ribosomes 24/7 for the rest of our lives? In all of our cells? Did they cause a ‘frame-shift’ to an extend or distorted the coding that the ‘off’ codes no longer exist or exist in portions of the mRNA that reads as garbage/junk/nonsense and do not function to switch off apike protein translation? Is this why we have LONG COVID symptoms?
Taken from a post by Berenson (see below and good reporting) and these are words of Weissman (as shared by Berenson) showing he lied, he lied that they, mRNA, degrade quickly and he lied that they are identical to cellular mRNA:
Remember this paper by Katharina Röltgen in CELL, titled:
Immune imprinting, breadth of variant recognition, and germinal center response in human SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination
See this reporting by Röltgen showing just how much Weissman lied:
‘We performed in situ hybridization with control and SARS-CoV-2 vaccine mRNA-specific RNAScope probes in the core needle biopsies of the ipsilateral axillary LNs that were collected 7–60 days after the second dose of mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 vaccination and detected vaccine mRNA collected in the GCs of LNs on days 7, 16, and 37 postvaccination, with lower but still appreciable specific signal at day 60 (Figures 7A–7E). Only rare foci of vaccine mRNA were seen outside of GCs.’
‘spike protein and vaccine mRNA were reported to persist up to 60 days from vaccination with either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 as detected by immunohistochemistry and in-situ hybridization.’
What about Fertig et al.?
‘In this study, we used qPCR to track circulating mRNA in blood at different time-points after BNT162b2 vaccination in a small cohort of healthy individuals. We found that vaccine-associated synthetic mRNA persists in systemic circulation for at least 2 weeks.’
What about Ogata et al.?
‘S1 antigen was detected as early as day 1 postvaccination, and peak levels were detected on average 5 days after the first injection (Figure 1A). The mean S1 peak level was 68 pg/mL ± 21 pg/mL. S1 in all participants declined and became undetectable by day 14. No antigen was detected at day zero for 12 of 13 participants, as expected. However, one individual presented detectable S1 on day zero, possibly due to assay cross-reactivity with other human coronaviruses or asymptomatic infection at the time of vaccination. Spike protein was detectable in 3 of 13 participants an average of 15 days after the first injection. The mean spike peak level was 62 pg/mL ± 13 pg/mL. After the second vaccine dose, no S1 or spike was detectable, and both antigens remained undetectable through day 56.
For one individual (participant 8), spike was detected at day 29, 1 day after the second injection and was undetectable 2 days later.
Plasma antibodies IgG, IgA, and IgM were measured against spike, S1, RBD, and nucleocapsid. Antibody levels measured on day zero represent the baseline level in each participant, all who had no previous report of COVID-19 infection. In all 13 participants, as expected, IgG levels against spike, S1, and RBD increased after the first injection, whereas IgG against nucleocapsid showed no change over time (Figures 1D, E, F; individual participant data are shown in Supplementary Figures 2–14). IgA is involved in early neutralization activity and is therefore crucial to target potentially short-lived IgA responses [8]. Our Simoa assays detected increased IgA against spike, S1, and RBD after the first injection (Supplementary Figures 2–15). Nine participants (such as participants 3, 4, 5, and 7, Figure 1G) presented measurable IgG levels against S1 and spike by day 14 after the first vaccine injection. Four participants (participants 1, 6, 10, 13, Supplementary Figures 2, 7, 11, and 14), showed a delayed IgG-S1 and IgG-spike response, which did not increase until day 28 after the first injection. Nonetheless, all participants showed additional boost in IgG-S1 after the second injection.’
What about Bansal et al.?
‘To determine the mechanism, we analyzed the kinetics of induction of circulating exosomes with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and Ab following vaccination of healthy individuals. Results demonstrated induction of circulating exosomes expressing spike protein on day 14 after vaccination followed by Abs 14 d after the second dose. Exosomes with spike protein, Abs to SARS-CoV-2 spike, and T cells secreting IFN-γ and TNF-α increased following the booster dose. Transmission electron microscopy of exosomes also demonstrated spike protein Ags on their surface. Exosomes with spike protein and Abs decreased in parallel after four months.’
What about Patterson et al. finding spike protein at least for the duration of study, at 15 months post virus infection and thus we can extrapolate to vaccine?
‘We analyzed T-cell, B-cell, and monocytic subsets in both severe COVID-19 patients and in patients with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC). The levels of both intermediate (CD14+, CD16+) and non-classical monocyte (CD14Lo, CD16+) were significantly elevated in PASC patients up to 15 months post-acute infection compared to healthy controls (P=0.002 and P=0.01, respectively). A statistically significant number of non-classical monocytes contained SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein in both severe (P=0.004) and PASC patients (P=0.02) out to 15 months post-infection.’
What about Krauson et al.?
‘Vaccine was detected in the myocardium in a subset of patients vaccinated within 30 days of death. Cardiac ventricles in which vaccine was detected had healing myocardial injury at the time of vaccination and had more myocardial macrophages than the cardiac ventricles in which vaccine was not detected. These results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines routinely persist up to 30 days from vaccination and can be detected in the heart.’
See Berenson below, nice report, I must give credit.
Re; mRNA it GMOs you.
Not good to be permanently Genetically Modified. You can NEVER go back. For one, someone owns you. Wait until the lemmings figure that out.
Check the Law books. Search Chile Laws for genetically modified people on rumble, bitchute, etc.
There's absolutely no reason to allow yourself to be injected with anything man has created. Virology and vaccines are all a big fraud, a scheme to sell the population something it does not need. Modern snake oil.orevlike snake venom since it's is injected. Run away fast and far from any scientist or doctor that claims they have it all figured out, that they know Mother Nature better than she knows herself, that their laboratory concoction will protect you better that a hundred million plus years of evolution of mammals.
The only thing we need to fear is fear itself. That, and whatever snake oil salesmen claim will alleviate your fears and protect you from an invisible non-existent Boogieman that they themselves invented.