What about the Menachery paper? What about the original SARS (which I suspect I may have had back in 2003, as I was in Seattle and a lot of Chinese come and go on that side)? Multiple release theory is plausible, IMO. GoF, I don't know. Maybe it was engineered to have a low CFR so it can spread everywhere, not kill too many people, but b…
What about the Menachery paper? What about the original SARS (which I suspect I may have had back in 2003, as I was in Seattle and a lot of Chinese come and go on that side)? Multiple release theory is plausible, IMO. GoF, I don't know. Maybe it was engineered to have a low CFR so it can spread everywhere, not kill too many people, but be used as an instrument of fear. In fact, a low CFR could result in killing more people, as it gets to spread more and take longer to burn out. SARS and MERS were more lethal, but burned out faster. There is ome thing that is more clear though. The best delivery method for a bioweapon is not a virus; it's a needle.
Menachery paper is credible...issue is I am asking, is that applicable here? I am beginning to say NO...I also said there is GoF, these fuckers do this all the time, but is it that lethal? but set that aside, is it applicable here and if we say yes, well, where is the proof? ok as to you having SARS 1 in 2003...but what if that is a normal coronavirus...I am talking about this 2020 event...I dont buy it. I learnt lots on biowarfare and I cannot write details here for some is very very sensitive, but pathogen can be placed on a ballistic missile...I learnt...and delivered into a city, over, in sewers etc. as aerosolized etc. there is lots in person we can talk about, I dont want to give the bad guy any ideas...our role is to save lives...but there are bad folk reading my stack too.
Before 2019 I was on a self destruct mission. After I prepared myself both mental and physically for the flight. I've done more reading in the last four years than my previous 58 and what I've read about GoF leads me to believe that those involved in it know that it's not a viable weapon. Why do I say that? Because the basic law of nature is to survive and pass on your genetic material propagating your species correct? So if an organism is genetically modified to kill everyone it infects that would violate the law. The organism naturally want to survive correct? So what will it do in the wild? It will always mutate to a less deadly more infectious version of itself according to the laws of nature, survive and pass on your genes.
So Dr. Paul, it's very possible they used a modified relatively harmless bug like the common cold virus (corona virus) and released it in several areas and it killed a bunch of people within small areas, towns, cities. Just enough to produce the desired result, a perception something bad was afoot. Along with the great point campaign, death counters on the TV screens and on the radios panic set in. But then it did it's natural thing and mutated to less deadly more infectious versions of itself in line with nature. Just as they reported.
When we've been lied to about so much for so long it's easy to believe your being lied to when they decide to tell you the truth.
My impresiion has been that the main difference between MERS, SARS, and SARS-2 on one side and normal coronavirus on the other side, is the tendency of the former to induce red blood cell clumping and to attack the alveoli. The red blood cell clumping effect has been looked at multiple papers co-authored by David Scheim. Have there been some not so normal coronaviruses causing ILL illnesses emerging somehow here and there that noone ever heard about? Maybe. And maybe they didn't spread far enough for anyone to notice if they were highly lethal.
Understand. Multiple release would be plan B, if the thing can't spread globally on its own on the appropriate time schedule. I don't see how they would know ahead of time how far it would spread and whether it would need some assistance, you can do math modelling, but with the stakes involved, they would certainly have plan A (let it spread on its own) and plan B (multiple release). It is possible that low CFR though was a deliberate feature and not a bug; facilitate wide spread so pandemic can be claimed. Then hit larger fatality rates with the vaccine mandates to follow. And bad guys who run the op, can take prophylactic HCQ, not take the shot, and they are cool. No blowback to them.
I wonder what sort of cell infrastructure updates happened in 2003 or the year or two prior there seems to be a lag from when it goes up and these so called SARS "viruses" pop up.
If they are regularly releasing these things every few years, to gather real world data, it could appear to correlate with cells, which are also increasing in bandwidth over time. If we hypothesize (big stretch) that a certain frequency induces certain mutations, why would it not do so continuously from that point forward indefinitely? If it is the amplitude doing it, i.e. they turn up the "volume" then it isn't the frequency. So anything is possible, but haven't seen anything proving this. Close proximity to cell towers is probably very bad for you though; inverse square law.
Whatever it was that I had in 2003 knocked me out for two weeks, altered my taste for a few days, may have had my O2 go down a bit for a few days (i remember opening the windows to get fresh air because I didn't feel right breathing), severe fatigue for two weeks where I could hardly get up to do much, and after recovering dry cough for 4 weeks. It started with a huge fever spike in first couple of days, then settled down to lower level over the next two weeks. Was not very transmissible because my gf at the time didn't get it; I was in her apt for two weeks after the apparent viral replication phase, which didn't last very long, so my guess is virus was probably done by day 3. Very similar to covid, but covid was much milder for me because I treated the hell out of it. Never ever had anything like it between 1992 and 2024. Never had any flus and never took flu shots. So, shit happens and shit goes around, whatever that thing was. But it did seem to be biphasic, kind of like what Shankara Chetty and McCullough described in their papers re covid, first replication with huge fever spike, then cytokine overreaction. All other viral infections I ever had were just annoying sniffles, making me have rolls of toilet paper on my office desk 🙄😂. Maybe some mild fever here and there. I survived it, whatever it was.
What about the Menachery paper? What about the original SARS (which I suspect I may have had back in 2003, as I was in Seattle and a lot of Chinese come and go on that side)? Multiple release theory is plausible, IMO. GoF, I don't know. Maybe it was engineered to have a low CFR so it can spread everywhere, not kill too many people, but be used as an instrument of fear. In fact, a low CFR could result in killing more people, as it gets to spread more and take longer to burn out. SARS and MERS were more lethal, but burned out faster. There is ome thing that is more clear though. The best delivery method for a bioweapon is not a virus; it's a needle.
Menachery paper is credible...issue is I am asking, is that applicable here? I am beginning to say NO...I also said there is GoF, these fuckers do this all the time, but is it that lethal? but set that aside, is it applicable here and if we say yes, well, where is the proof? ok as to you having SARS 1 in 2003...but what if that is a normal coronavirus...I am talking about this 2020 event...I dont buy it. I learnt lots on biowarfare and I cannot write details here for some is very very sensitive, but pathogen can be placed on a ballistic missile...I learnt...and delivered into a city, over, in sewers etc. as aerosolized etc. there is lots in person we can talk about, I dont want to give the bad guy any ideas...our role is to save lives...but there are bad folk reading my stack too.
Before 2019 I was on a self destruct mission. After I prepared myself both mental and physically for the flight. I've done more reading in the last four years than my previous 58 and what I've read about GoF leads me to believe that those involved in it know that it's not a viable weapon. Why do I say that? Because the basic law of nature is to survive and pass on your genetic material propagating your species correct? So if an organism is genetically modified to kill everyone it infects that would violate the law. The organism naturally want to survive correct? So what will it do in the wild? It will always mutate to a less deadly more infectious version of itself according to the laws of nature, survive and pass on your genes.
So Dr. Paul, it's very possible they used a modified relatively harmless bug like the common cold virus (corona virus) and released it in several areas and it killed a bunch of people within small areas, towns, cities. Just enough to produce the desired result, a perception something bad was afoot. Along with the great point campaign, death counters on the TV screens and on the radios panic set in. But then it did it's natural thing and mutated to less deadly more infectious versions of itself in line with nature. Just as they reported.
When we've been lied to about so much for so long it's easy to believe your being lied to when they decide to tell you the truth.
My impresiion has been that the main difference between MERS, SARS, and SARS-2 on one side and normal coronavirus on the other side, is the tendency of the former to induce red blood cell clumping and to attack the alveoli. The red blood cell clumping effect has been looked at multiple papers co-authored by David Scheim. Have there been some not so normal coronaviruses causing ILL illnesses emerging somehow here and there that noone ever heard about? Maybe. And maybe they didn't spread far enough for anyone to notice if they were highly lethal.
maybe whatever it was had been circulating for years...benign...it is what we did that put pressure on it? selective? the medical management?
Understand. Multiple release would be plan B, if the thing can't spread globally on its own on the appropriate time schedule. I don't see how they would know ahead of time how far it would spread and whether it would need some assistance, you can do math modelling, but with the stakes involved, they would certainly have plan A (let it spread on its own) and plan B (multiple release). It is possible that low CFR though was a deliberate feature and not a bug; facilitate wide spread so pandemic can be claimed. Then hit larger fatality rates with the vaccine mandates to follow. And bad guys who run the op, can take prophylactic HCQ, not take the shot, and they are cool. No blowback to them.
Yes, its like those controls spraying Silver Cloride across America for the Climate. You just don't know what you are injesting these Days.
boom
I wonder what sort of cell infrastructure updates happened in 2003 or the year or two prior there seems to be a lag from when it goes up and these so called SARS "viruses" pop up.
https://www.timetoast.com/timelines/cell-phones-in-2003
Looks like 2001 we had 3G deployed so a year or two later, yep we have SARS.
https://www.cengn.ca/information-centre/innovation/timeline-from-1g-to-5g-a-brief-history-on-cell-phones/
This is a pattern no one wants to look at and needs to. To think 6G is right around the corner if we let these assholes keep WiFrying us.
If they are regularly releasing these things every few years, to gather real world data, it could appear to correlate with cells, which are also increasing in bandwidth over time. If we hypothesize (big stretch) that a certain frequency induces certain mutations, why would it not do so continuously from that point forward indefinitely? If it is the amplitude doing it, i.e. they turn up the "volume" then it isn't the frequency. So anything is possible, but haven't seen anything proving this. Close proximity to cell towers is probably very bad for you though; inverse square law.
They are planning on installing them in our National Parks “For your safety”, so there will be no place for those impacted to go to recover.
Whatever it was that I had in 2003 knocked me out for two weeks, altered my taste for a few days, may have had my O2 go down a bit for a few days (i remember opening the windows to get fresh air because I didn't feel right breathing), severe fatigue for two weeks where I could hardly get up to do much, and after recovering dry cough for 4 weeks. It started with a huge fever spike in first couple of days, then settled down to lower level over the next two weeks. Was not very transmissible because my gf at the time didn't get it; I was in her apt for two weeks after the apparent viral replication phase, which didn't last very long, so my guess is virus was probably done by day 3. Very similar to covid, but covid was much milder for me because I treated the hell out of it. Never ever had anything like it between 1992 and 2024. Never had any flus and never took flu shots. So, shit happens and shit goes around, whatever that thing was. But it did seem to be biphasic, kind of like what Shankara Chetty and McCullough described in their papers re covid, first replication with huge fever spike, then cytokine overreaction. All other viral infections I ever had were just annoying sniffles, making me have rolls of toilet paper on my office desk 🙄😂. Maybe some mild fever here and there. I survived it, whatever it was.
I too had similar respiratory problems but in 2010 lost taste Dr. thought I had pneumonia but after CXR negative took me a month to get over it.