Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andreas's avatar

We have an orgy of evidence at this point. There is no doubt.

If volume of evidence against the use of these bioweapons in humans (or indeed livestock, animals of any kind) was going to trigger a stopping condition then it would have been stopped, globally.

So, why hasn't it stopped?

There are government agencies with mandates that are acting in direct contravention. We now have empirical proof. Is the next move to take them to court, personally and collectively?

Or do we just bulldoze the letter agencies into rubble, as an act of self-defence?

Because the status quo is a genocide. And it ain't stopping.

Peace.

Javaman's avatar

How many bodies will it take before you get somebody up high grow a conscience or spine? When will the press become legitimate again? When will Americans wake up to this dream of safety to only find out that they have been part of a nightmare?

27 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?